Wednesday January 8, 2025
| |||
SNc Channels: HomeNews by DateSportsVideo ReportsWeatherBusiness NewsMilitary NewsRoad ReportCannabis NewsCommentsADVERTISEStaffCompany StoreCONTACT USRSS Subscribe Search About Salem-News.com
Salem-News.com is an Independent Online Newsgroup in the United States, setting the standard for the future of News. Publisher: Bonnie King CONTACT: Newsroom@Salem-news.com Advertising: Adsales@Salem-news.com ~Truth~ ~Justice~ ~Peace~ TJP |
Oct-17-2006 01:05TweetFollow @OregonNews Son of Measure 11 is Born, to go Before Oregon Voters in 2008Kevin Hays Salem-News.comMeasure 11, a 1994 ballot measure, set minimum mandatory sentences for violent crimes and serious sex offenses. It was approved by Oregon voters, by a nearly two-thirds majority, and went into effect on April 1st, 1995.
(SALEM) - Drug manufactures and dealers, identity and car thieves, home and business burglars, and forgers in Oregon listen up, get caught and you will be going to prison, no questions asked. Former Republican State Party Chairman, Gubernatorial candidate, and Measure 11 author Kevin Mannix has submitted a ballot initiative petition for the November 2008 General Election that if approved by voters would set mandatory minimums for the manufacturing and dealing of street drugs and certain property crimes. Oregon ranks eighth highest in the U.S. for property crimes. “I’m glad to put these predatory criminals behind bars” Mannix said. “Property crimes such as identity theft are especially damaging to our citizens because they create a sense of personal violation, and the criminals who commit these crimes need to by held accountable, not with a slap on the wrist, or probation, in prison” Mannix added. One key point about the measure Mannix pointed out is that sentences imposed would be served in state prison facilities and work camps. Sentences could not be served in county jails, except as to time served pending trial. Also the state would be required to reimburse the county as to the actual cost of pretrial incarceration of each person sentenced under the measure. The first four crimes listed below would be for anyone convicted of the crime, while the over four would require at least one prior misdemeanor or felony conviction. Mandatory minimum sentences under the proposed ballot measure would be as follows: 36 months for the illegal manufacture or illegal delivery of methamphetamine, heroin, cocaine, or 3, 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine under circumstances constituting a Class A felony under ORS Chapter 475. 30 months for the illegal manufacture or illegal delivery of methamphetamine, heroin, cocaine, or 3, 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine under circumstances constituting a Class B felony under ORS Chapter 475. 36 months for identity theft as defined in ORS 165.800 36 months for burglary in the first degree as defined in ORS 164.225. 18 months for forgery in the first degree as defined in ORS 165.013, when the person has a serious criminal record. 18 months for motor vehicle theft as defined in Section 4 of this Act, when the person has a serious criminal record. 14 months for theft in the first degree as defined in ORS 164.055, when the person has a serious criminal record. 14 months for burglary in the second degree as defined in ORS 164.215, when the person has a serious criminal record. * For the purposes of this Act, a person has a serious criminal record when the person has at least one pervious conviction of a felony or at least two previous convictions of misdemeanors. * For the purposes of this Act, “previous conviction” includes any conviction occurring on, or after January 1, 2009, and any conviction entered in any other state or federal court for any offense comparable to any Oregon misdemeanor or felony. * For the purposes of this Act, “motor vehicle theft” means theft, as defined in ORS 164.015, of a passenger motor vehicle in ORS 801.360, a motor truck as defined in ORS 801.355, or a motorcycle as defined in ORS 801.365. Motor vehicle theft is classified as a Class C felony. If approved by voters, the measure would take effect on January, 1st 2009. Mannix said signature gathers for the proposed ballot measure will be hitting the streets around the state this week. Articles for October 16, 2006 | Articles for October 17, 2006 | Articles for October 18, 2006 | Support Salem-News.com: googlec507860f6901db00.html Quick Links
DININGWillamette UniversityGoudy Commons Cafe Dine on the Queen Willamette Queen Sternwheeler MUST SEE SALEMOregon Capitol ToursCapitol History Gateway Willamette River Ride Willamette Queen Sternwheeler Historic Home Tours: Deepwood Museum The Bush House Gaiety Hollow Garden AUCTIONS - APPRAISALSAuction Masters & AppraisalsCONSTRUCTION SERVICESRoofing and ContractingSheridan, Ore. ONLINE SHOPPINGSpecial Occasion DressesAdvertise with Salem-NewsContact:AdSales@Salem-News.com | |
Contact: adsales@salem-news.com | Copyright © 2025 Salem-News.com | news tips & press releases: newsroom@salem-news.com.
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy |
All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.
Henry Ruark October 19, 2006 7:08 pm (Pacific time)
As with previous initiatives setting new demands on State governance, this one contains no funding mechanism. In effect it drains decision from elected Legislators --poor as they may be at times--and substitutes easy-out feeling-score of sometimes uninformed majority. We already suffering deeply from same in education and other areas. Nix Mannix again on this one, as in primary.
Anonymous October 18, 2006 8:53 am (Pacific time)
RE: Why is a mandatory minimum so important? You should do some research... do you know how much jail time identity thieves get????!!!! I know of one that had a check printing operation he used to DRAIN people's checking accounts - sentenced to 30 days w/ credit for time served and a couple years of probation. In my mind probation is pretty useless and ineffective - the case workers are overloaded and dont keep very good tabs on their "clients". All the "clients" have to do is turn in a questionaire once a month. THAT IS WHY THEY REOFFEND! The consequences are MINIMAL!
Anonymous October 17, 2006 8:18 pm (Pacific time)
Why is a mandatory minimum so important? Don't the people expect Judges to do their jobs, since they're elected to their positions? There is already a set of sentencing guidelines that have to be abided by. Why take even more power away from the people? To think that serious crimes aren't taken seriously already is ridiculous. BUT, the amount of people re-offending is a problem. That's societal. Sending every one up the river is just the old-fashioned philosophy of "seen and not heard". But they will be heard. Their families vote, and we, as tax payers, will pay the price if this is all about building prisons and keeping the culture of corruption profiting. This is one to keep your eye on, no matter on which side of the fence you believe yourself to be.
Albert Marnell October 17, 2006 2:17 pm (Pacific time)
You call me a weirdo because to someone in a bell jar, you know nothing else to say of value. I am proud to be a WEIRDO. EINSTEIN was a WEIRDO.
Albert Marnell October 17, 2006 2:14 pm (Pacific time)
Yes, I am a weirdo to people with limited life experience and real education. I am a weirdo to people who count on television and other MSM for their information because they are not bright enough to find it elsewhere. Thank you, from unevolved embryos, that is a compliment. You might be lucky enough one day to know what I am talking about.
JM October 17, 2006 12:38 pm (Pacific time)
I agree with Anonymos, AM is a weirdo
Anonymous October 17, 2006 12:03 pm (Pacific time)
Weirdo.
Albert Marnell October 17, 2006 11:12 am (Pacific time)
You all look the other way when it comes to the big issues. These things are petty when you look at the federal and state tax dollars stollen from you stupid ass paychecks every week. But this is easy for your middle class minds to understand. FOOLS! PUT MORE POLITICIANS IN JAIL, MORE PEOPLE IN THE MILITARY, POLICE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT WORKERS THAT DO NOT WORK OR STEAL! FOOLS! GULLIBLE FOOLS!
Albert Marnell October 17, 2006 11:04 am (Pacific time)
Morons! The BIGGEST criminals are in government, and Wall Street. But you are not educated enough to understand this. Go after the corrupt politicians, bankers and multinationals, not the small guy!
Henry Ruark October 17, 2006 8:56 am (Pacific time)
Great question for both candidates for Governor: Where do you stand on this possible initiative ? We need to know NOW just in case...
Reporter Correction October 17, 2006 8:43 am (Pacific time)
Correction: In the story it says while the over four would require at least one prior misdemeanor or felony conviction. It should have read: at least one prior felony conviction or two misdemeanor convictions.
Anonymous October 17, 2006 8:30 am (Pacific time)
YEAH!!! I will vote yes for this one. Finally someone wants to take these crimes seriously - and do something about it. Currently offenders get little to no punishment for Identity Theft - its no wonder they keep reoffending. They can virtually get away with it.
[Return to Top]©2025 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.