Wednesday May 27, 2020
Jun-22-2011 16:13TweetFollow @OregonNews
The Toxic Chinese Drywall ControversyRalph E. Stone Salem-News.com
It is estimated that between 60,000 and 100,000 homes and commercial properties across the United States were made from this material.
(SAN FRANCISCO) - I first became aware of the problem of toxic drywall manufactured in China during my 2010 visit to New Orleans. Many homeowners rebuilt their homes after Hurricane Katrina in August 2005, and Hurricane Rita in September 2005 using Chinese drywall. This drywall made occupants sick, corroded metal fixtures, and rendered homes unfit to live in. Homeowners had to tear out the drywall, corroded wiring, fixtures, etc. About 700 to 1,000 New Orleans families were affected. These hurricane victims suffered the initial trauma of damage to their homes, fixed up their damaged homes, and then faced the cost of removing Chinese drywall and corroded wiring. To add insult to injury, many of these homeowners had their claims denied by insurance companies because of insurance policy exclusions.
As much as 250 million board feet of this Chinese drywall came into the United States through West Coast ports, including Oakland, Long Beach, and Seattle. Chinese drywall is believed to have been imported in the U.S. since at least 2001 when a building boom and a busy hurricane season caused a domestic drywall shortage that lasted up to 2008. Much of the Chinese drywall was also used to rebuild Louisiana homes damaged by Hurricane Rita and Chinese drywall has been discovered in Virginia, Alabama, Mississippi and California.
According to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), homeowners in 26 states have filed numerous complaints with the agency. It is estimated that between 60,000 and 100,000 homes and commercial properties across the United States were made from this material.
In a May 25, 2010 press release <www.cpsc.gov/CPSCPUB/PREREL/
Homeowners complained of a rotten egg smell in their homes and condominiums. The cause of this foul smelling odor is now known to be caused by gases emitted from the defective Chinese drywall, which can cause significant damage to HVAC (Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning), smoke detectors, electrical wiring, metal plumbing components, and other household appliances. The gases permeate homes and can cause asthma-like symptoms, eye irritation, bloody or runny noses, headaches, sore throats, nausea, insomnia, and irritability.
As the manufacturers are located in China, pending litigation names U.S. suppliers as defendants. Seifart v. Banner Supply Company, 11th Judicial District of Florida, was the nation's first Chinese drywall case to go to trial. The plaintiffs, a Florida family were forced out of their home by foul odors and toxic fumes. In June 2010, the jury found Miami-based Banner Supply liable on the grounds of negligence, public nuisance and violation of Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act and awarded the family $2.47 million. The trial is a bellwether for about 1,000 lawsuits in the Florida courts, as well as 5,000 suits filed in federal court that have been consolidated in multi-district litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
In the multi-district litigation, In re: Chinese- Manufactured Drywall Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2047 (E.D. La.), Banner Supply Co., insurers, and homeowners agreed in a court filing on June 14, 2011, to a $55 million settlement of claims that the corrosive product damaged homes, all or nearly all of them in Florida. The proposed settlement, which requires approval from U.S. District Judge Eldon Fallon in New Orleans, would resolve claims by thousands of plaintiffs against Banner Supply Co., several related companies and Banner's insurers. The settlement, however, covers just a portion of the claims by homeowners. Judge Fallon is presiding over more than 10,000 claims by residents blaming damage to their homes on Chinese drywall, which was used in construction throughout Florida and the Gulf Coast.
Banner claimed it did not know the drywall was defective. Yet, Banner knew by October 2006 that builders were complaining about odors from the drywall, yet continued to sell it. Banner also allegedly entered into a confidential agreement with Knauf, one of the Chinese manufacturers, in early early 2007 that called for Knauf to replace about 44,000 pieces of its drywall with a domestic product.
Judge Fallon in the Banner case also ruled invalid some, but not all, the policy exclusions relied on by insurance companies to deny coverage for toxic Chinese drywall.
With the Seifert jury verdict against a Chinese drywall supplier and the Banner settlement, I would expect a flood of settlements in the remaining pending cases and cases to come.
The Florida Department of Health developed a self-assessment guide to make it easier for homeowners to determine if their home meets the criteria for a possible case of drywall associated corrosion www.doh.state.fl.
Salem-News.com writer Ralph E. Stone was born in Massachusetts. He is a graduate of both Middlebury College and Suffolk Law School. We are very fortunate to have this writer's talents in this troubling world; Ralph has an eye for detail that others miss. As is the case with many Salem-News.com writers, Ralph is an American Veteran who served in war. Ralph served his nation after college as a U.S. Army officer during the Vietnam war. After Vietnam, he went on to have a career with the Federal Trade Commission as an Attorney specializing in Consumer and Antitrust Law. Over the years, Ralph has traveled extensively with his wife Judi, taking in data from all over the world, which today adds to his collective knowledge about extremely important subjects like the economy and taxation. You can send Ralph an email at this address email@example.com
Articles for June 21, 2011 | Articles for June 22, 2011 | Articles for June 23, 2011