Tuesday January 7, 2025
| ||||||||||
SNc Channels: HomeNews by DateSportsVideo ReportsWeatherBusiness NewsMilitary NewsRoad ReportCannabis NewsCommentsADVERTISEStaffCompany StoreCONTACT USRSS Subscribe Search About Salem-News.com
Salem-News.com is an Independent Online Newsgroup in the United States, setting the standard for the future of News. Publisher: Bonnie King CONTACT: Newsroom@Salem-news.com Advertising: Adsales@Salem-news.com ~Truth~ ~Justice~ ~Peace~ TJP |
Jul-12-2012 23:20TweetFollow @OregonNews CLIMATE: Skeptic Group Takes Aim at JournalistsLawrence Hurley Special to Salem-News.comJournalists will now face the same pressures that scientists have experienced from ATI.
(WASHINGTON DC E&E Greenwire) - A conservative group that has used public records requests in an attempt to publicize emails written by climate scientists has turned its attention to reporters who cover the environment. The American Tradition Institute (ATI), which has garnered attention for seeking emails written by climate scientist Michael Mann when he worked at the University of Virginia, is making similar Freedom of Information Act requests concerning email exchanges between scientists and reporters. The aim is to illustrate what the group describes as "collusion" between the "media and environmentalist establishments." The top target so far is New York Times reporter Justin Gillis, who covers environmental science for the paper. Chris Horner, director of litigation at ATI, said he decided to investigate Gillis after the Times published a story in April on how climate skeptics are, as Gillis wrote, relying on the argument "that clouds will save us." The story examined the role of leading skeptic Richard Lindzen, a meteorology professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who maintains that predictions of catastrophic climate change are overstated in part because clouds can counter the effects. Among those quoted is clouds expert Andrew Dessler, a researcher at Texas A&M University, a public institution subject to the Texas Public Information Act. Horner filed a request with the university and subsequently received emails written by Gillis, which he described as "quite remarkable, disappointing, if I admit not all that surprising." In an article summarizing the emails, which was published in the Washington Examiner, Horner said Gillis told Dessler it was "unavoidable" that he would have to speak to Lindzen in order to write the story. Gillis asked for comprehensive information on the relevant published science on clouds so that he would be fully prepared to counter Lindzen's arguments. The reporter, Horner wrote, "comes off as an activist posing as a journalist." Gillis declined to comment, saying that he and his Times colleagues would "let our published work speak for itself." Gillis was "doing his job," Dessler said, by preparing for his interview with Lindzen by "getting from me the mainstream view of climate change." Dessler also noted his own incentive to be friendly to reporters, saying it was a coup for him and his institution to have his work mentioned in The New York Times. "I'm nice to reporters because part of my job is to get my research out," he added. Gillis is not the only one whose work is being scrutinized by ATI. Others include Suzanne Goldenberg, a U.S.-based reporter with the U.K. Guardian newspaper, who wrote a story on the issue earlier this week. Horner's latest move has attracted criticism both from scientists and environmental groups, who say it's another way for ATI to achieve its goal of chilling speech among scientists. "Any unguarded comment mailed in what a scientist thought was a private communication can be found and fed into the right-wing echo chamber," said Jeff Ruch, executive director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility. "It, in essence, is forcing scientists to behave as if they are public figures without having made a decision to enter public prominence." Mann, now a researcher at Pennsylvania State University, said journalists will now face the same pressures that scientists have experienced due to the "rampant threats of retribution and intimidation by those doing the bidding of vested interests who fund the attacks against climate science." Horner defended his focus on journalists, pointing out the fact that reporters generally benefit from freedom of information laws. He pointed to a Washington Post editorial that criticized his group as evidence of double standards. "We apply the laws in the same way as journalists and green pressure groups have been using them," he said. Lawrence Hurley is an E&E reporter. Reporter Paul Voosen contributed. First published here: http://www.eenews.net/public/Greenwire/2012/07/11/1
_______________________________
Articles for July 11, 2012 | Articles for July 12, 2012 | Articles for July 13, 2012 | googlec507860f6901db00.html Quick Links
DININGWillamette UniversityGoudy Commons Cafe Dine on the Queen Willamette Queen Sternwheeler MUST SEE SALEMOregon Capitol ToursCapitol History Gateway Willamette River Ride Willamette Queen Sternwheeler Historic Home Tours: Deepwood Museum The Bush House Gaiety Hollow Garden AUCTIONS - APPRAISALSAuction Masters & AppraisalsCONSTRUCTION SERVICESRoofing and ContractingSheridan, Ore. ONLINE SHOPPINGSpecial Occasion DressesAdvertise with Salem-NewsContact:AdSales@Salem-News.com | ||||||||
Contact: adsales@salem-news.com | Copyright © 2025 Salem-News.com | news tips & press releases: newsroom@salem-news.com.
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy |
All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.
Anonymous July 19, 2012 1:22 pm (Pacific time)
Ralph let's just take the last 4 major glacial periods...what caused the cooling and heating processes? You think the same processes could be at work now? 2000 years ago it was considerably warmer that even the area now known as England had a viable wine growing climate, so what happened? Did man create so much smoke/smog that it reflected the warming sun and we cooled off? Follow the money...there are reasons why people work for the government, regardless of talent and specialty, many simply cannot compete in the private market. That goes double for lawyers.
Dexter July 13, 2012 3:08 pm (Pacific time)
Global warming from humans ?
Last time I heard , it was from this lot:
www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/cow-emissions-more-damaging-to-planet-than-co2-from-cars-427843.htm
Great news for the pacified vegans.
Dexter July 13, 2012 12:30 pm (Pacific time)
They do not have a hope in hell in screwing New York Times reporter Justin Gillis over. New York Times has some of the biggest heavy weight legal teams in the world covering their backs, as well as there "assets" . If I was in Justin's shoes ...I would be sitting back laughing all the way to the bank (due to free world wide exposure to his stories) thanks to ATI . Right on ATI ;)
Ralph E. Stone July 13, 2012 7:46 am (Pacific time)
There is a scientific consensus that global warming is occurring and it is primarily caused by human activities. The task now is to do something about it before it is too late for planet Earth. The American Tradition Institute (ATI) should properly be called the heads-in-the-sand group. For years groups like ATI have been doing a disservice to mankind by duping the public with misinformation and disinformation about global warming. Unfortunately, it is working. According to an April 2012 Rasmussen Reports survey only 40 percent of Americans believe that global warming is primarily caused by human activity. As a result, the public's skepticism provides cover for our politicians to avoid the difficult task of addressing global warming.
[Return to Top]©2025 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.