Rape is ALSO an 'Incident to Service'?

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW" is written above the main entrance to the U.S. Supreme Court Building. Any ideas on how to make this happen for veterans and active duty military men and woman?

diversityinc.com

(WASHINGTON, DC) - As of 2014 the U.S. Congress has yet to make a "Rule" preventing injurious, non-consensual experiments on and rape of U.S. Military Personnel, i.e., by a Law of the Land NOT by a Dept. of Defense (DOD) Administrative Decree!! The U.S. Congress’s 2014 Dereliction of Duty? Any "EQUAL JUSTICE" for service women & men ideas?

["To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces." [1] is the U.S. Congress’s responsibility under the U.S. Constitution, Art. I, Sect. 8, Clause 14 and under the Bill of Rights, Amendment VIII is, "...nor cruel and unusual punishments." [2]. Doesn’t this mean the U.S. Congress stopping their own proven veteran’s betrayal [5] by the DOD, "experiments that were designed to harm" and the DOD’s "Degrading Treatment" [6] by their rape of service women? Please require your members of congress to obey their 70 years of an abandoned Oath of Office! Shouldn't U.S. Service Personnel have the same U.S. Constitutional, Amendment 8, Rights that convicted rapists and murderers keep under, The International, "...Freedom from Torture, or Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment."[6]?

[The Oath of Office for the U.S. Congress is: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God."[10]

["EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW" is written above the main entrance to the U.S. Supreme Court Building. Any ideas on how to make this happen for veterans and active duty military men and woman?

[This 1950 U.S. Supreme Court Feres Case determined that an accidental barracks fire death was a U.S. is not responsible "incident to service"![9] Then the 1987 U.S. Supreme Court STANLEY decision wraps up deliberately injured experimented on Military Personnel in the "incident to service" accidental cloak![7] Approved was an injurious 1958 non-consensual LSD experiment. This experiment was in direct disobedience of the DOD Secretary’s 26 February 1953 NO non-consensual experiments Administrative Decree [8], as overlooked by the U.S. Supreme Court and U.S. Congress!! The 1987 U.S. V. Stanley Case, Footnote 4, Page 688 states, "TO CONCEAL THESE ACTIVITIES FROM THE AMERICAN PUBLIC IN GENERAL, BECAUSE PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE OF THE UNETHICAL AND ILLICIT ACTIVITIES WOULD HAVE SERIOUS REPERCUSSIONS IN POLITICAL AND DIPLOMATIC CIRCLES....".[7] These are the still U.S. Congress ignored DOD Secretary and CIA, Inspector General's non-consensual human experiment statements. In 2014 Congress’s own to date ignored "HAZARDOUS" "LESSONS" learned [5] span SEVENTY (70) years without correction, i.e., 1944 - 2014! (EMPHASIS ADDED THROUGHOUT) Therefore, the rape of and deliberate injuring experiments on military personnel are just 'incidents to service'?

[As proven by an EIGHT (8) times rejection of the "Veterans Right to Know Act", a divided U.S. Congress still withholds military needed for treatment and experimentation identifying records.[4] On 25 July 2012 a U.S. Judge ordered the VA to release these records![3] Before that there is Congress's own 1994 U.S. Senate Report, "IS MILITARY RESEARCH HAZARDOUS TO VETERANS' HEALTH? LESSONS SPANNING HALF A CENTURY.". It records that "EVERY YEAR, THOUSANDS OF EXPERIMENTS UTILIZING HUMAN SUBJECTS ARE STILL BEING CONDUCTED BY, OR ON BEHALF OF, THE DOD." Then the "I. INTRODUCTION" with its, "III. Findings and conclusions" states, "K. DOD and DVA have repeatedly failed to provide information and medical followup to those who participate in military research..." plus "N. Participation in military research is rarely included in military medical records, making it impossible to support a veteran’s claim for service-connected disabilities from military research."[5] Also to-date U.S. CONGRESS scorned is this 1994 U.S. SENATE REPORT'S, "The Feres Doctrine should not be applied for military personnel who are harmed by inappropriate human experimentation when informed consent has not been given." A then FIFTY YEARS OF EXPERIMENTS IGNORED!

David Marshall is a 100% disabled U.S. Air Force Veteran who served from 1952 to 1956.

Salem-News.com's Dr. Phil Leveque has written extensively about military rape, click this link to see his reports.