Monday December 30, 2024
| |||
SNc Channels: HomeNews by DateSportsVideo ReportsWeatherBusiness NewsMilitary NewsRoad ReportCannabis NewsCommentsADVERTISEStaffCompany StoreCONTACT USRSS Subscribe Search About Salem-News.com
Salem-News.com is an Independent Online Newsgroup in the United States, setting the standard for the future of News. Publisher: Bonnie King CONTACT: Newsroom@Salem-news.com Advertising: Adsales@Salem-news.com ~Truth~ ~Justice~ ~Peace~ TJP |
Feb-22-2011 16:57TweetFollow @OregonNews Leaders Must Face The Reality of The EnvironmentJerry West Salem-News.comBecoming sustainable will be very painful for many of us, but not as much as it will if we defy nature and have it forced on us. Leaders must face this.
(GOLD RIVER, B.C.) - The Liberal and New Democratic parties are coming into the home stretch on their run to choose a new leader. The Libs will pick one this weekend, and BC will have a new premier. Seven weeks later the NDP will choose, and who knows how long before the new premier decides to call an election. Speculation is sometime before the 2013 mandated date. The most important issue facing the province, in fact facing the world, is stabilization of the environment and the development and implementation of policies to insure a sustain-able ecological system than can continue to support human society without a radical readjustment of that society. A re-adjustment that is certain to come if we continue to alter our ecosystem at the to the degree and at the rate that we currently do. Briefly, where do the leadership contenders stand on this? Mostly, they do not. There is some support among Liberals for banning cosmetic pesticides, and some pay some attention to the carbon emission problem, but all seem to favour the economy over the environment, and an increase in resource extraction. The NDP contenders pay more attention to environment. Again, banning pesticides is a favourite item. They are more circumspect in their approach to resource extraction than the Liberals and more concerned with the carbon problem. Of the NDP contenders Horgan has the most detailed envi-ronment platform. The NDP is officially committed to a sustainable society, and some of their leadership contenders at least pay lip service to the idea. However, there seems to be no mention of what really needs to be done to start putting society back on to a stable, sustainable basis. That is, there is no discussion of reducing consumption and reversing growth. The two most important things that we must do for the long term survival of our society. It is no surprise that the Liberals do not admit to this, their corporate sponsors would revolt, but the NDP should be taking it more serious than they do. Humans have evolved over millions of years to exist within a certain type of ecosystem, and the rate of change in that system has not been great until recently as the world has acquired about ten times the number of people in the sys-tem than it had supported for ages. It may be that the rate of change in the ecosystem will outrun the ability of humans to gradually adopt with the result that there will be a radical change in human society as it dies back to fit into the changed system. At present we are taking more renewable resources from the system than can be sustained. In effect we have come to the point where we are eating our seed stock, or in in-vestment jargon, consuming our principal. The only question is: how do we choose to manage the tran-sition to the new ecological reality. The more that we cut back on the human footprint by reducing total consumption (a factor of population and individual consumption) the more likely the system will stabilize at a more comfortable level for humans (and many other species, too bad about the ones already wiped out). One should understand that how we live is affected by all other aspects of nature, and as we change one thing, we change everything, even if only to a small degree. After awhile even the small changes can add up to a big one. We can not stabilize the ecosystem by increasing the size of society and the size of our economy and the consumption required to support it. We have to face the fact that a grow-ing society and economy is a cancer killing the future of our descendants as we consume resources faster than they can be replaced. We would not have this problem if there were far fewer of us, but unfortunately we have used technological develop-ment to increase our numbers more than to increase the quality of life for everyone. Becoming sustainable will be very painful for many of us, but not as much as it will if we defy nature and have it forced on us. Leaders must face this. Jerry West grew up on a farm in Fresno County, California, and served with the US Marine Corps from 1965 to 1970 including 19 months in Vietnam with the Third Marine Division, and three years at MCAS Iwakuni where he became an anti-war organizer in 1970. He earned an Honors Degree in History at the University of California, Berkeley, and did two years of graduate study there. While in university he worked seasonally in fire and law enforcement with the US Forest Service. After university he worked for a number of years in the international tour industry in operations and management before moving to a remote village on the west coast of Vancouver Island where he is currently the editor and publisher of The Record newspaper serving the Nootka Sound region. He is a Past President of the Northern California Land Trust, and a member of Phi Beta Kappa. You can email Jerry West, Salem-News.com Writer, at: newsroom@salem-news.com Articles for February 21, 2011 | Articles for February 22, 2011 | Articles for February 23, 2011 | googlec507860f6901db00.html | |
Contact: adsales@salem-news.com | Copyright © 2024 Salem-News.com | news tips & press releases: newsroom@salem-news.com.
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy |
All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.
Jaswinder April 8, 2013 12:26 am (Pacific time)
"I too believe that you vote for a ponress judgement and not just a polling company that then votes on your behalf."Then why do you consider the judgment of the 114 MP's that are joining a coalition that can credibly get things done (I may disagree with those things) undemocratic? Why is the judgment of those MP's (which is informed by polls, in part) that their constituents will support such a move undemocratic?"Dion and Layton could cobble together an agenda and head to the polls as a united force and take on Harper."Canadians elected a parliament. We should see if some configuration of that parliament can work before having an election - particularly because the time since an election has been so short. "As it stands they have fleshed out no reason for this power grab and cannot even decide on short term solutions like who is PM,"They are working out a deal that will surely include that. Moreover, they have two reasons, one self-interested (the subsidy) the other stupid (which Tories should attack). -why launch into a stimulus before we know what the Americans will do?-point out that spending cuts in some areas can enable the government to have a bigger stimulus in areas where the effects will be positive (how would you rather stimulate the economy - public sector salaries or infrastructure spending).What I am suggesting is that the best tack for the Tories is to attack the substance, not the procedural appropriateness. Prime Minister Dion, Finance Minister Layton, all backed by separatists - THAT is the line, not "based on our interpretation of democracy that is not rooted in precedent, we think this is undemocratic."They got us - but we shouldn't lose our heads in anger or become a circular firing squad. The outcome is outside the hands of Conservatives.
Daniel Johnson February 23, 2011 8:19 pm (Pacific time)
Jerry: Your last sentence: "The leaders must face this," misses the point. It is the population at large who must face this. Then they will select leaders who will do something. Don't forget that in our political system, leaders are actually followers.
It's articles like this that contribute to public awareness.
Jerry West February 23, 2011 7:35 pm (Pacific time)
Yes, Kevin, the sewage problem is there. It is an item of perpetual debate in Victoria. However, like climate change and most other environmental problems it is only a symptom of the real problem.
The biggest problem with the environment, a global problem, is way too much consumption and economies that have grown far too big to be supportable. Politicians need to be focusing on programs of reduction and reverse growth and redistribution rather than the never ending BS about growing economies, yadda, yadda, yadda.
Kevin February 23, 2011 6:34 pm (Pacific time)
Jerry sounds as though your home province, my childhood home, is more problem than solution. Time to get your environment in order, (maybe) to set an example of responsibilty, before lecturing others on future environmental needs? One of many unsustainable problems there: "Canada flushes approx 200 billion liters of raw sewage directly into natural waterways every year, from the St Lawrence River to the Strait of Juan de Fuca and the Pacific Ocean. That is only six percent of the three trillion liters of sewage Canadians produce annually but it is still enough to fill more than forty thousands Olympic sized swimming pools. The sewage that is dumped into Canada’s waterways is called domestic sewage, which originates from household waste. Victoria is a major Canadian participant in polluting Canada’s waterways in our society today, and on an international level, Venice has had severe pollution issues with many of their rivers and waterways. These two examples, Victoria, British Colombia, and Venice, Italy have minimal, if any treatment being done to their sewage and continue, either due to ignorance or lack of funds to build sewage treatment facilities, and to dispose of that sewage into fresh waters, which contaminates them. "WHEREAS" The United States requires all coastal cities to have secondary sewage treatment, which is the process of removing solids and other pollutants. Canada on the other hand, does not have national sewage standards. The Victoria capital Regional District pumps 120 million liters of raw sewage into the Strait of Juan de Fuca everyday. The sewage runs through a 6 mm screen, which only removes large solids, such as tampons and condoms. What remains are the toxic cleaners, solvents, medicines, and other contaminants that get flushed down sinks and toilets. It is then pumped through two outfall pipes, which run more than 60 meters deep, and a kilometer into the currents of the Strait of Juan de Fuca. Two of Victoria’s treatment plants continue discharging sewage receiving only primary treatment. Coastal areas have the lowest levels of treatment because as quoted by Christine Wilhelmson, Clean Air and Water program coordinator for the Georgia Straight Alliance, “they have the luxury of being able to dump where people don’t see it.” http://schoolworkhelper.net/2010/12/sewage-dumping-in-victoria-british-columbia-venice-italy/
[Return to Top]©2024 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.