Thursday January 9, 2025
SNc Channels:

Search
About Salem-News.com

 

Feb-21-2006 11:22printcomments

Oregon Supreme Court Upholds Measure 37

The AP contributed to this story

Photo: Salem-News.com
Measure 37 requires governments to pay landowners for
property value losses caused by regulation, or to forgo regulations.
Photo: Salem-New.com

(Salem) - The Oregon Supreme Court upheld a voter-approved property rights law today, sweeping aside a lower-court ruling that said the measure was unconstitutional. Measure 37 requires governments to pay landowners for property value losses caused by regulation, or to forgo regulations. In today's ruling, the Supreme Court reversed a decision issued in October by Marion County Circuit Judge Mary James, who said Measure 37 violated the state and federal constitutions.

Governor Kulongoski praised the Oregon Supreme Court for its timely action in addressing a challenge to Ballot Measure 37, which voters passed in 2004.

"I am grateful that the Oregon Supreme Court has addressed this matter so quickly," the Governor said. "Oregonians have been well served by the attention this critical case has received from their Supreme Court justices, and I thank them."

"Today the court has answered the fundamental question about the constitutionality of Measure 37, but many other questions about the measure remain unanswered," the Governor added. "Without some action by the legislature, it may be years before additional court cases begin to clarify all of the uncertainties about the law. In the process, those cases will entail substantial costs and frustrations for state and local governments and private property owners throughout Oregon.

"I want to make it clear that the legislature has the power to resolve the questions about this measure in order to strengthen fairness in our land use program, while still preserving Oregon`s heritage of wise land use planning. I am prepared to work with the legislature to develop a workable alternative to the measure, as I did in the past session.

"Finally, the court`s decision today underscores even more urgently than before the need for the recently appointed Task Force on Land Use Review to undertake a comprehensive review of our land use planning program. I renew my charge to the Task Force to work thoughtfully and to engage Oregonians in shaping a new vision for the future."

Stay with Salem-News.com for more on this developing story.




Comments

Comments are Closed on this story.



sherry kipfer August 8, 2007 10:57 am (Pacific time)

I am at the other end of Measure 37 wherein the effects of this measure has vastly undue hardship to my family. The unfair bias of State, city and county governments to waive the developer from conforming to laws of our land. We now have a cemetery going in - we have no rights. The developer has violated riparian setback area and brought in fill dirt to bury people in. I was told by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers that I had good cause to worry about the health and safety of those of us living on the creek. Bodily waste from rotting bodies is harzardous. Nobody is stepping in to protect our rights. We are poor and cannot affort a Land Use Attorney to protect our rights. Our constitutional rights ARE VIOLATED. Measure 37 has no compensation for neighboring property owners and its adverse and negative impact and devaluation of our home

[Return to Top]
©2025 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.


Articles for February 20, 2006 | Articles for February 21, 2006 | Articles for February 22, 2006
Support
Salem-News.com:



Sean Flynn was a photojournalist in Vietnam, taken captive in 1970 in Cambodia and never seen again.

Annual Hemp Festival & Event Calendar

Tribute to Palestine and to the incredible courage, determination and struggle of the Palestinian People. ~Dom Martin

The NAACP of the Willamette Valley