Monday January 21, 2019
SNc Channels:



Dec-11-2012 22:40printcomments

Malignant Narcissism in Circumcision

The overwhelming majority of repeat sexual predators do what they do because they want to. John Douglas, FBI.[1]

Baby - circumcision
Courtesy: Ha'aretz

(MONTEREY, CA) - The American Academy of Pediatrics crafted a criminally based Circumcision Policy Statement justifying male abuse and molestation. Advisory members from other medical specialties included, in part, Obstetrics & Gynecology, Urology and Family Practice as well as the Centers for Disease Control. Obstetricians perform most circumcisions. Pediatric Urologists often repair errors with some making that their entire practice.

RADM Preston’s 1970 article in the Journal of the American Medical Association stated there are over 100 fatalities annually from circumcision.[2] This prompted the Pediatrics association to issue a Policy Statement in 1971 against routine efficacy. Policy has been blandly upheld until now. Yet, the practice continued despite. And fatalities continued. In 42 years the conservative estimate of deaths are 4,200. The numbers are more likely than not from required Reportable events which occur only at the time and place of incidence - if made at all.[3]

Recently the American Academy of Pediatrics failed advocating the most minor genital assault on females because of public backlash. But the practice continues underground. Males also need protection. The Sacrificial Male must cease. The Sacrificial Child must cease.[4,5,6]

It is time to evaluate the medical profession’s policy in the realm of criminology with regard to circumcision.[7] It must be realized few lead with the majority following. Serial sexual offenders of children place themselves in proximity to victims. Funding for the process is mainly from outside interests. When a predator has the ability to hide his mental condition from co-workers and others indicates average and above average intelligence.[8]

Motive Quoting FBI’s John Douglas and Mark Olshaker until endnote:

When you’ve analyzed what should be the motive based on the crime scenario and that doesn’t make sense, and you go through all the other “logical” ones and you can’t make one of them fit reasonably, then you start looking into psychiatric territory.

All crimes have a motive; all crimes make sense according to some logic, though that logic may be a strictly internal one with no relationship to any “objective” logic. In many instances, a hidden sexual motive emerges, a motive that originates in fantasy.

Tragically, this motive of uncontrolled anger and the need for sexual domination doesn’t always occur against strangers. Many sexual sadists are married or in ongoing relationships – totally self-involved narcissists.[9]

When bodies are assaulted or parts excised, the perpetrator is signifying his wish to remove any vestiges of humanity from the victim.[10]

Ritual transference of circumcision is a person must die to be born again into a new existence. Medical transference uses manipulated and disguised science. Both ritual and medicine with circumcision disconnect and restructure reality.[11] Both use the criminal Approach of the Con.[12,13] They are one and the same.

If the Con is accepted by the person, or the populace, perpetrators gain lifelong power, control and authority over their victim(s).

Quoting another text of FBI’s John Douglas and Mark Olshaker until endnote:

The victim is a representation. The excuses used, the causes espoused, are convenient justifications. It is transference in Reason Avoidance so not to confront and deal with reality. The violent act is from a deep seated psychological inadequacy.

To solve the problem of inadequacy the represented object must be defiled and eliminated. The sex of the victim becomes an object and inferior.

Once the course of action is decided, the Organized offender is calm and the internal conflict of stress is eliminated. The offenders who get close and personal to their victim actually do not get emotionally involved. This dissociation maintains distance. Thus they feel comfortable in the situation they are able to control.

There is no remorse or contrition. Everything is a matter of fact. They know the difference between right and wrong. Changing wrong to right changes the standards. This then makes the consequences non-consequential.[14]

Any empathy expressed by a predator for their victim is purely self-serving.[15]

Objectification of another person’s humanity is Dissociation. The objectified person is as a tool. The genitals are attacked through Transference of Aggression.

Malignant Narcissism

From Vaknin we realize the effect the Intactivist community has had on circumcision’s Narcissistic Supply of other people. Circumcision rates have decreased to the point of threatening their existence. Thus, medicine has come out re-advocating circumcision and funded by outside interested parties especially for research most recently based on improper African articles.

The medical degree allows vast leeway to behavior. Physicians are not immune to psychopathy whether high or low in the scale of their professional organizations as well as outside those organizations.

The following are quotes and condensations from Sam (Shmuel) Vaknin until endnote:

The narcissist is an actor in a melodrama, yet forced to remain behind the scenes. The scene takes center stage. He feeds off other people who hurl back at him an image that he projects to them. This is their sole function in his world: to reflect, to admire, to applaud, to detect – in a word, to assure him that he exists. Otherwise, they have no right to tax his time, energy, or emotions – so he feels.

The narcissist’s ego is weak and lacks clear borders. Many of the ego functions are projected. The superego is sadistic and punishing. The id is unrestrained. Primary objects in the narcissist’s childhood were badly idealized and destroyed.

He becomes unscrupulous, never bothered by the constant use he makes of his milieu (surroundings), is indifferent to the consequences of his actions, the damage and the pain that he inflicts on others and even the social condemnation and sanctions that he often has to endure.

The narcissist does not suffer from a faulty sense of causation. He is not oblivious to the likely outcomes of his actions and to the price he may have to pay.

But he doesn’t care. The narcissist lives in a world of all or nothing, of a constant “to be or not to be.” The narcissist represses the knowledge that it all rests on falsities.

The narcissist derives his Narcissistic Supply from Primary and Secondary sources. But this supply is used by the narcissist much the same as one does perishable goods. He uses the supply to substitute for certain ego functions.

At first, he uses his False Self (criminologists call this the Service Personality used in the Con) with the aim of obtaining Primary Narcissistic Supply source by demonstrating his superiority. Once this phase is successfully over the narcissist is established, securing a constant flow of Narcissistic Supply and narcissistic accumulation.

His False Self is satisfied and exits the scene. It will not reappear unless the supply is threatened. [16]

Narcissism is a genetic component that parallels the personality trait of aggression. Karen Horney developed the NPA Personality Theory. N = Narcissism.
P = Perfectionism. A = Aggression.[17,18]

Crime Serial sexual predators are creatures of habit; they find a method of destruction that works and stick to it.[20]

Circumcision is a Mock Death ritual of play killing.[21] Criminally and medically circumcision is a Genital Dismemberment.[22]

Circumcision’s Genital Dismemberment is the Signature of the crime.

Signature is termed the crime’s Ritual, also called the Calling Card, indicating the unique psychological need in power and control and rarely varies.[23]

Dismemberments are indicative of psychopathic Lust Crimes in Major Sadism.[24,25]

Circumcision is a sexual crime.[26,27,28]

Intent of the perpetrator is not a factor determining whether or not a crime occurred; protection of the child is paramount.[29]

Circumcision deaths are Involuntary Manslaughters whether medicine considers it an acceptable risk or not.[30,31]

Few deaths or complications are covered by the press and in many instances are unavailable to them. Professional quietness in both Medicine and Law Enforcement pervades in hiding. The perpetrator doesn’t care what happens to his victims as long as he gets what he wants. John Douglas, FBI.[32]

Also by Dr. Richard Matteoli:

    Circumcision: Serial Killing, Criminal Behavior and Medical Violence

    Previous Social Mandated Reports can be accessed from:

    Dracula’s Circumcision

    All articles are Mandated Reports to the social body regarding socialized and

    acculturated abuse.

    [1] Douglas, John with Olshaker, Mark, Obsession, Pocket, 1998.

    [2] Preston EN, RADM, “Whither the Foreskin? A Condition of Routine Neonatal Circumcision,” Journal of the American Medical Association, 1970, 213: 1853.

    [3] Schwartz WM, Charney EB, Curry TA, Ludwig S, Pediatric Primary Care: A Problem-Oriented Approach, 2

    ed., Year Book Medical Publishers, 1990.

    [4] Myers, John EB, Legal Issues in Child Abuse and Neglect Practice, SAGE Publications, Interpersonal Violence: The Practice Series, Second edition, 1998.

    [5] Pozgar, George, Legal Aspects of Health Care Administration, Aspen, 1990.

    [6] Johnson, Seigler and Winslade, Clinical Ethics, 3rd edition, McGraw Hill, 1984.

    [7] Dietrich D, Berkowitz L, Kadushin A, McGloin J, “Some factors influencing abusers’ justifications of their child abuse,” Child Abuse & Neglect, 14, 337-345.

    [8] Cullen, Robert, Citizen X, Ivy Books, 1992.

    [9] Douglas, John with Olshaker Mark, Obsession, Pocket, 1998.

    [10] Ressler, Robert, & Shachtman T., I Have Lived in the Monster, St. Martin’s, 1997.

    [11] Bell, Catherine, Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice, Oxford University Press, 1992.

    [12] Douglas, John with Olshaker, Mark, The Anatomy of Motive, Pocket, 1997.

    [13] Michaud, Stephen with Hazelwood, Roy, The Evil That Men Do, St. Martin’s, 1998.

    [14] Douglas, John with Olshaker Mark, The Anatomy of Motive, Pocket, 1997.

    [15] Reid WH, “Myths About Violent Predators and All That Pesky Legislation,” Journal of Practical Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, July, 1998, 4:246-248.

    [16] Vaknin, (Shmuel) Sam, Malignant Self Love: Narcissism Revisited, Narcissus Pub.,

    [17] Benis AM, “A theory of personality traits leads to a genetic model for borderline types and schizophrenia,” Speculations in Science & Technology (1990) Vol. 13, No. 3,

    [18] Hartman CR, Burgess AW, “The Genetic Roots of Child Sexual Abuse,” Journal of Psychotherapy and the Family, 1986, 2 (2): 83-92.

    [19] Dawkins, Richard, The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press, 1976.

    [20] Evans, Colin, The Casebook of Forensic Detection: How Science Solved 100 of the World’s Most Baffling Crimes, John Wiley & Sons, 1996.

    [21] Graves, Robert, The Greek Myths, Penguin, 1992.

    [22] Neumann, Eric, The Great Mother, Princeton University Press, 1991.

    [23] Keppel, Robert with Birnes, William, Signature Killers: Interpreting the Calling Cards of the Serial Murderer, Pocket, 1997.

    [24] Michaud, Stephen with Hazelwood, Roy, The Evil That Men Do, St. Martin’s, 1998.

    [25] Hazelwood, Robert R. “The Criminal Sexual Sadist,” Law Enforcement Bulletin, (FBI), February 1992.

    [26] Ressler, Robert; Burgess, Ann; Douglas, John, Sexual Homicide: Patterns and Motives, The Free Press, 1988.

    [27] De River, J Paul, The Sexual Criminal: A Psychological Study, Bloat, 2000.

    [28] Podilsky E, “Sexual Violence,” Medical Digest, 1966, 34: 60-63.

    [29] Monteleone, James, Recognition of Child Abuse for the Mandated Reporter, GW Medical Publishers, 1996.

    [30] Gifis, Steven, Law Dictionary, 2 ed., Baron’s Educational Series, 1984.

    [31] Sosby D, “Altruistic Filicide: Bioethics or Criminology,” Health Ethics Today, Vol. 12, No. 1, Fall/November, 2001.

    [32] Douglas, John with Olshaker, Mark, Obsession, Pocket, 1998. ____________________________________

    Richard Matteoli graduated from St. Mary's College of California in 1967 and Creighton University in 1971. He is retired from the US Navy where he spent most of his career attached to the United States Marine Corps and officially rated a Devil Doc. Other clinical experience outside private practice includes working for California Indian Health and California's Solano County Clinic for the poor as well as the Solano County Jail.

    He is the author of the Handbook text references The Munchausen Complex: Socialization of Violence and Abuse and The Totemic Analogy in Bible Symbolism. has carried several articles over the years. Dr. Matteoli has also been helpful in research for other articles we have carried, particularly with regard to military base contamination. We have been very pleased to have the honor of sharing his valuable writing with our readers.

    You can write to Richard Matteoli at this address:



    Comments Leave a comment on this story.

    All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.

    Diana Leigh August 22, 2013 5:09 pm (Pacific time)

    FGM/MGM, the cult-like mark of Patriarchy, denies girls anything that might be seen as "male" and cleanses boys of anything seen as "female". It embodies the hysterical fear of anything indeterminate or trans. It's misogynistic in that it devalues woman's role of producing humans, implying they must be "corrected" or "completed" after being born. It also breaks the bond between mothers and their newborns. Mothers, unable to protect their children, turn away from them. Children, not receiving protection from its expected primary source are cast adrift. These broken loyalties are then gathered and criminally reassigned to Patriarchy

    Keith Rutter December 17, 2012 2:42 pm (Pacific time)

    As a circumcised man who has long known that his penis was not as good as those belonging to his intact brethren, Intercourse gradually became less satisfying, and now I find it impossible to orgasm during intercourse, and difficult with masturbation. If only the family doctor had been one of those "anti-circers", but he wasn't, and his ignorance has ruined my sexlife. Please leave your baby boy as nature intended, he can get it done when he is adult if he wants to, though he won't if has any knowledge of his penis. I cannot praise too highly the parents who realise that their son's future sexual life is far more important than their own cultural/religious views. Moses Maimonides admitted some 800 years ago that circumcision was performed in order to reduce sexual pleasure, and it does.

    Greg Allan December 14, 2012 8:02 pm (Pacific time)

    My apologies but I may have double posted.

    My primary engagement is in advocacy for male victims and victims of female perpetrators of child sexual abuse. They are significantly marginalised in many ways. Many of the factors creating this marginalisation are also enablers of circumcision.

    Personally I was the recipient of a botched job the botching of which the hospital didn't tell my young, naive parents about. An uncle recently opened up to me about his own, worse, circumstances.

    In Australia the rates have dropped to about one in five but it's still well over 75,000 baby boys every year who endure this atrocity.

    I've noticed the opposition to circumcision among Jews for a while. It's mere existence reinforces the respect I've always held for Judaism. I'm no fan of Israel but without exception the many Jews I've known through my life were exemplary folk.

    I wanted to point out to Michael that circumcision is not only a Jewish practice. Nor would I hold Judaism responsible for it's practice in the western world. I'd also point out that those other cultures which circumcise girls also do it to boys.

    Greg Allan December 14, 2012 7:29 pm (Pacific time)

    Pleased to see others recognising the practice to be sexual abuse. Very few would have trouble seeing parents handing an infant over to a third party for the purpose of fondling the child's genitals as being sexual abuse. Yet many of those same folk see nothing wrong with doing it for the purpose of cutting those same genitals. I've been called a "lunatic" for merely asking the question. Glad I'm not the only lunatic.

    Greg Allan December 14, 2012 7:10 pm (Pacific time)

    Pleased to see others recognising the practice to be sexual abuse.

    Very few would have trouble seeing parents handing an infant over to a third party for the purpose of fondling the child's genitals as being sexual abuse. Yet many of those same folk see nothing wrong with doing it for the purpose of cutting those same genitals. I've been called a "lunatic" for merely asking the question.

    Glad I'm not the only lunatic.

    Editor: Greg you are anything but alone, and Jewish people are leading this fight, know there are many of us in the world of  all faiths bright enough to recognize this for what it is; life-altering fundamentalist religious sex abuse.

    miichael roloff December 13, 2012 12:30 pm (Pacific time)

    Making it a taboo to compare male with female sexual mutilation is the biggest scandal of the controversy. In both instances the most sensitive and most erogenous zone of the human body is amputated and severely damaged. In both instances, what counts primarily is the cutting of human sexuality. The imposition of control by the patriarchy.

    What is lacking in all the talk about circumcision is discussion of its
    archeological dimension - that it is the left over of human sacrifice.
    What kind of god is it that asks a people to sacrifice? Or a people who create such a god for themselves?

    Also, unfortunately it is / has been circumcision that has MADE for no end of anti-semitic sentiments. Freud found that it was the chief reason for unconscious anti-Semitism. And the myths surrounding it are at the core of the “blood libel.” Thus, it's time to eliminate the Brit Milah because if that is the chief reason for being anti-Semitic or anti-Abrahamic [Islam too practices the rite] then why hang on to this left-over of human sacrifice? that traumatizesthe child, cutting off 5,000 nerves, that is the equivalent of female circumcision in the sense that it eliminates everything but the clitoris,and only serves the UltraOrthodox to maintain their power? After all, reform Judaism sought to eliminate the rite in the 19th century, and Jewish identity depends on being born by a Jewish mother, or converting. Here a link to an archive of the entire German and then some debate, note especially Michael Wolffsohn's two pieces . Circumcision has been controversial also within Jewry forever.

    [Return to Top]
    ©2019 All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of

    Articles for December 10, 2012 | Articles for December 11, 2012 | Articles for December 12, 2012
Special Section: Truth telling news about marijuana related issues and events.

Your customers are looking: Advertise on!

Call 503-362-6858 to Order Ahead  or for Party Reservations!

Tribute to Palestine and to the incredible courage, determination and struggle of the Palestinian People. ~Dom Martin