Saturday January 4, 2025
SNc Channels:

Search
About Salem-News.com

 

Oct-28-2008 01:26printcomments

Op Ed: 'Socialism' Shades
U.S. Business From
Capitalist Heat

Bailouts for distorted “Free Market” destroy system.

piles of hundred dollar bills
Widespread deregulation removed reasonable governmental surveillance and control, as generous subsidies for powerful industries continue to eat away at the U.S. taxpayer's dollar.

(EUGENE, Ore.) - Our Founding Fathers set up what was then very definitely “big government” in both concept and coverage intended. They knew only wise governance could accomplish some essential actions, from study of the world’s leading philosophers.

They already faced early, threatening agricultural secessionists. (Shay’s Rebellion) They felt they had to restore fleeing slaves to plantation owners, protecting Southern interests. They meant to be ready for Indian resistance to the inevitable Western drive for dominion. They rapidly made the power of their new form of government clear by redeeming otherwise worthless bonds for speculators financing the American Revolution.

The first actions of the first American Congress were to subsidize manufacturers by establishing tariffs; then to set up a national bank with already-established private firms.

Those revealing actions reflected a common-sense attitude which led to ongoing strong support and subsidy for many decades. That was how we created canals, merchant marine, railroads, then national roads; and opened up Westward expansion, with huge land grants for colleges and universities established to build our manufacture and research efforts, too.

But that was 1776-1860; this is 2008, starting the 21st Century. What was demanded THEN is NOT what is demanded from us NOW. Sometimes, when American enterprise went too far --and often too fast-- in the complex business of the modern world, that has forced lush bailouts by suddenly reluctant government for some parts of our American economy.

Famously, American historian Charles Beard, in 1931, identified fifteen interventions by government to aid, assist and/or rescue big business. The pattern of taxpayer payouts as rescue-resource continued intermittently, triggered time and again by the business cycle, world events, and sometimes even cataclysmic weather-impacts.

The radical concept that “Government IS the problem!”, key element of the Reagan Era, turned the Founders fundamental findings for our firm economic foundation upside down. The tenor of those times then insisted that “Greed is good!”.

“It seemed like a good idea at the time” is the most widespread explanation now of this truly radical --and theatrical-- departure from our recorded history.

That attitude motivated and manipulated the current deep damages. Widespread deregulation removed reasonable governmental surveillance and control. Generous subsidies for powerful industries continued with extremely damaging impacts.

As late as 2006, the Cato Institute reports $92 billion in taxpayer dollars for General Electric, Boeing, Dow Chemical, Xerox and Motorola. BUT “socializing the risk while privatizing the profits” goes much too far, most modern Americans now believe.

Worldwide economic credit-crisis “caused by continued laissez faire and overly determined monetarism”, has solidified already strong negative attitude for millions more, more recently.

This Presidential election will determine our choice for the coming Century, just as theirs did for their time. We are wise to question how lush bailouts lavished on freebooters simply perpetrate “socialism only for the rich”.

These freebooters abandon promised integrity, then avoid or deny any reasonable regulation, by covert control of ostensibly elective authorities. They flavor all operations with greed and “gotcha”, easing every action via money manipulations.

Corporate “campaign contributions” substitute dollar-power for elective authority, conferred by voter choice.

“Open, honest, transparent, independent” operation attributed to “the free market”, and its always-miraculous “automatic remedy” for even “irresponsible exuberance”, have proven monstrous economic myths. Unrealistic expectations of business dogmas have brought us to this perilous point in our 21st Century world.

In 1776, never before had there been the essential combination of continental opportunity, open dependence on essential freedoms, and the huge natural resources and land-sweep our predecessors found open in this New World.

Overwhelmingly complex needs and unforeseeable demands swept away both caution and citizen concern. The universal mood, mode and multiple actions were surely motivated by intense, manifold personal mission and professional mandate felt by those early-arrival entrepreneurs.

That same striking essential for unique “American exceptionalism” served them --and their nation-- very well for many decades. It shaped and drove both the Monroe Doctrine and the concept of Manifest Destiny, clearly shaping foreign policy and “free trade” while this nation was a’building.

Widespread public apathy, very obviously motivated by growing disgust with constant overblown political confrontations, have created a perilous new public condition.

That destroys trust-and-confidence once enjoyed by political groups, substituting a beginning demand for a Second American Revolution. Cultural, social, economic changes shape the new generations. Huge population growth, bolstered by millions of immigrants seeking “equal opportunity for all, under law”, add additional strivings as well as greater national capacities.

Failure of our “free press” to inform, monitor and motivate full citizen understandings is a root cause of our calamity. Revolting recent developments arrived insidiously, manipulated by malign intent-- overwhelming democratic processes. Human personhood --and political “voice”--was conferred on corporations by Supreme Court precedent by “recorder-error”.

Power passed from our tried-and-true democratic elective control to corporate profit-driven perpetrators by “campaign contributions”.

We may never truly recover from this collapse of citizen concern and care for America’s national value system without painful remediation. Only decisive far-reaching return to Constitutional fundamentals on which this nation was first built can prevail against a money-shaped tide of private interests far over-shadowing the commonweal concerns of our 1776 Revolution.

The indispensable remedial action is rapid and complete return to the basic principles which led our Founding Fathers in establishing our governance system.

“Socialism for the rich” --paid for by primitive raids on taxpayer funds by either subsidies OR “special” bailouts-- can no longer be allowed to shade and protect any American business from the real competitive heat of the capitalist system.

Worldwide rapid developments in once-backward nations are now completing their own transition to the 21st Century. We must do likewise ourselves, or fall into the dustbin of history like other once-world-leader nations.




Comments Leave a comment on this story.
Name:

All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.



G.May November 2, 2008 1:55 am (Pacific time)

I'm really not sure where you get some of your facts. "Government IS the problem" may nor may not have been a "key" element in the Reagan era, but it was certainly not first seen then. That concept goes back to many of our founding fathers. To reduce arguments down to Reagan="Greed is good", or suggesting that all the fouding fathers had the same opinion is insulting and ignorant. It does not make for the intelligent discussion you appear to desire. Many of our current and proposed economic policies from both democrat and republican fly in the face of those founders who clearly felt government was the problem on many levels.


Henry Ruark October 28, 2008 11:57 am (Pacific time)

Chaser: Appreciate your appreciation, sir. You wrote:"Now that's oppression." NOT true: it is your interpretation of the Supremes' action. How I feel about your feeling is irrelevant; fact is that is Constitutional action which we can remedy by several means. You wrote: "Beard's critics considered him a vile Marxist. Forrest MacDonald, perhaps the best of the commentators on the Constitution – and Beard's view of it, accepts that there were economic motivations at work, but finds Beard guilty of gross oversimplification and misunderstanding of the actual politics of 1787." Ditto on that, too;to evaluate we must know "surround" for the critic; and WHY you make him "the best of commentators" on the Constitution. You wrote: "...it is a serious faux paus to apply contemporary standards to the past." (faux pas). That's not necessarily always true; there are times when that is not only a standard technique, but can be the most effective one. See Op Eds for various examples, too lengthy here. You wrote:"even a broken clock can provide the correct time for a brief instant every so often." Many now see that to apply to crushing collapse of neocon policies, with millions now deciding a broken watch will never serve them in the 21st Century. Your civil participation well appreciated, but we should do this direct via ID to Editor, in deference to space pressure here. Will welcome your firm contact gladly, and always willing to learn so long as the wheels stay on...


Chaser October 28, 2008 9:41 am (Pacific time)

Henry Ruark some excellent points in your OP Ed, and I especially enjoyed you mentioning quasi-historian Charles Beard which as you know progressives (far left "spread the wealth types" of his time) welcomed Beard's work as reducing the Constitution's authority by showing that the founders had economic motives just like everyone else (shock!). As you know we currently have people now who are unhappy with our Constitution and they are almost always federal judges who find things in our Constitution that are essentially made up or quite often they ignore state referendum/measures election results and nullify them. Now that's oppression. Then we have a candidate who said the Warren court did not go far enough by actually providing for reparations. Beard's critics considered him a vile Marxist. Forrest MacDonald, perhaps the best of the commentators on the Constitution – and Beard's view of it, accepts that there were economic motivations at work, but finds Beard guilty of gross oversimplification and misunderstanding of the actual politics of 1787. Mr. Ruark as you know it is a serious faux paus to apply contemporary standards to the past. New Left historian William Appleman Williams – on whom Beard had an obvious important influence – wrote that Beard was chiefly influenced by James Madison, Brooks Adams, and "KARL MARX" as regards the relationship of politics and economics. Beard's book "President Roosevelt and the Coming of the War, 1941" (1948) sought to nail down the case against FDR's policies and the duplicitous ways in which he pursued them. [It was a heroic effort on the part of a quasi-historian at the end of his life. It is easy to overlook his residual Progressivism in light of such an achievement.] Exposing FDR the way he did made me appreciate that even a broken clock can provide the correct time for a brief instant every so often.

[Return to Top]
©2025 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.


Articles for October 27, 2008 | Articles for October 28, 2008 | Articles for October 29, 2008
Support
Salem-News.com:

The NAACP of the Willamette Valley


Special Section: Truth telling news about marijuana related issues and events.

Click here for all of William's articles and letters.

googlec507860f6901db00.html