Sunday January 5, 2025
| |||
SNc Channels: HomeNews by DateSportsVideo ReportsWeatherBusiness NewsMilitary NewsRoad ReportCannabis NewsCommentsADVERTISEStaffCompany StoreCONTACT USRSS Subscribe Search About Salem-News.com
Salem-News.com is an Independent Online Newsgroup in the United States, setting the standard for the future of News. Publisher: Bonnie King CONTACT: Newsroom@Salem-news.com Advertising: Adsales@Salem-news.com ~Truth~ ~Justice~ ~Peace~ TJP |
Nov-17-2011 20:32TweetFollow @OregonNews American Nightmare: Return of the LudditesBy Daniel Johnson, Deputy Executive Editor, Salem-News.com“At this moment nothing but the army preserves us from that most dreadful of all calamities, an insurrection of the poor against the rich…”
(CALGARY, Alberta) - The Luddites of the early 19th century in England have been given a bum rap. The term is now used to refer to people who are against progress or resist change, which was not the case, at all. The Luddites of the early 19th century were desperate English workers. The Poor Law had been passed in 1601 and frequently amended, offering some help to the destitute. It was administered by parish officials who typically gathered the poor into workhouses, financed by a tax on householders who typically complained that their payments were wasted on ne’er do wells and promoted reckless fertility. The rate of relief was adjusted to supplement wages inadequate to meet the absolute minimums for survival. Some employers took advantage of this situation to keep wages low. Workers began to revolt. Forbidden by law to organize (the case in much of America, today), they secretly organized; forbidden by law to strike, they struck and when defeated, struck again. (This may be the progress of OWS) The revolt was led not by factory workers but by the home workers who were subjected to “hosiers”, who leased them frames and sold them raw material, then bought the finished products all at prices controlled by the hosiers. This was onerous enough, but they soon came to realize that their livelihoods would soon be replaced by automation in the form of multiple, power-driven factory looms. The movement spread from Nottinghamshire across England until half of England lived in fear, remembering the Terror of the French Revolution only a decade or so before. The poet Robert Southey wrote: “At this moment nothing but the army preserves us from that most dreadful of all calamities, an insurrection of the poor against the rich…” (The real issue of the Luddites was not progress, but too rapid progress.) This looks increasingly like the situation in America today. The Luddites were displaced by the new machines; Americans have been displaced primarily by outsourcing. Forty percent of American profits come from financial services. The Census Bureau released a new measure of poverty earlier this month which found 51 million people with incomes less than 50% above the poverty line!. All told, that puts 100 millions Americans, one in three, in that zone of insecurity called the “near poor”. Trudi J. Renwick, the Census Bureau’s chief poverty statistician says: “There are more people struggling than the official numbers show.” Robert Rector, at the right-wing Heritage Foundation, politicizes the situation. “I don’t have any objection to this measure if you use the term ‘low-income,’” he said. “But the emotionally charged terms ‘poor’ or ‘near poor’ clearly suggest to most people a level of material hardship that doesn’t exist. It is deliberately used to mislead people.” Tell that to the tens of millions of people who live paycheque to paycheque where “one bad bill can wipe you out”. Not even to mention an unexpected medical expense. While all this is going on, the top 1% of Americans take in 24% of the national income. President Obama appointed a 12-member bipartisan committee to find ways to reduce the federal deficit by $1.5 trillion over ten years. Republicans on the committee argue that this should happen with tax cuts only. Democrats are trying to frame the Republicans as protectors of the super-rich while the Republicans are shouting about “class warfare”. Does America have a social contract? Elizabeth Warren is a Harvard bankruptcy-law professor; the former head of the TARP oversight program, and a Democrat running for Ted Kennedy’s old seat in Massachusetts. She was a registered Republican until she was 46. She now talks about the “social-contract”—a topic few democrats raise and something the Republicans deny. She says: “You built a factory out there? Good for you, but I want to be clear: you moved your goods to market on the roads the rest of us paid for; you hired workers the rest of us paid to educate; you were safe in your factory because of police forces and fire forces that the rest of us paid for. You didn't have to worry that marauding bands would come and seize everything at your factory, and hire someone to protect against this, because of the work the rest of us did…you built a factory and it turned into something terrific, or a great idea? God bless. Keep a big hunk of it. But part of the underlying social contract is you take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who comes along." Mitt Romney, the Republican presidential aspirant is running on the slogan "Believe in America". Many are now wondering: What is there left to believe in? The picture above of 1890s street children is ancient history. Or is it? Instead of Robert Southey’s army, the rich of America are depending on police in riot gear to defend them against the Occupy Wall Street crowd. But how long before enough of those police realize that they, too, are part of the 99%? ___________________________________
Born and raised in Calgary, Alberta, Daniel Johnson as a teenager aspired to be a writer. Always a voracious reader, he reads more books in a month than many people read in a lifetime. He also reads 100+ online articles per week. He knew early that in order to be a writer, you have to be a reader. He has always been concerned about fairness in the world and the plight of the underprivileged/underdog. As a professional writer he sold his first paid article in 1974 and, while employed at other jobs, started selling a few pieces in assorted places. Over the next 15 years, Daniel eked out a living as a writer doing, among other things, national writing and both radio and TV broadcasting for the CBC, Maclean’s (the national newsmagazine) and a wide variety of smaller publications. Interweaved throughout this period was soul-killing corporate and public relations writing. It was through the 1960s and 1970s that he got his university experience. In his first year at the University of Calgary, he majored in psychology/mathematics; in his second year he switched to physics/mathematics. He then learned of an independent study program at the University of Lethbridge where he attended the next two years, studying philosophy and economics. In the end he attended university over nine years (four full time) but never qualified for a degree because he didn't have the right number of courses in any particular field. In 1990 he published his first (and so far, only) book: Practical History: A guide to Will and Ariel Durant’s “The Story of Civilization” (Polymath Press, Calgary) Newly appointed as the Deputy Executive Editor in August 2011, he has been writing exclusively for Salem-News.com since March 2009 and, as of summer 2011, has published more than 160 stories. View articles written by Daniel Johnson
Articles for November 16, 2011 | Articles for November 17, 2011 | Articles for November 18, 2011 | Quick Links
DININGWillamette UniversityGoudy Commons Cafe Dine on the Queen Willamette Queen Sternwheeler MUST SEE SALEMOregon Capitol ToursCapitol History Gateway Willamette River Ride Willamette Queen Sternwheeler Historic Home Tours: Deepwood Museum The Bush House Gaiety Hollow Garden AUCTIONS - APPRAISALSAuction Masters & AppraisalsCONSTRUCTION SERVICESRoofing and ContractingSheridan, Ore. ONLINE SHOPPINGSpecial Occasion DressesAdvertise with Salem-NewsContact:AdSales@Salem-News.com googlec507860f6901db00.html | |
Contact: adsales@salem-news.com | Copyright © 2025 Salem-News.com | news tips & press releases: newsroom@salem-news.com.
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy |
All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.
Troll - Anonymous001 / aka Reverend November 21, 2011 3:33 pm (Pacific time)
Fine Dan, call a regular reader and an avid supporter of the site a troll and continue to harangue based on nothing other than a belief that I am nothing but an idiot with nothing to offer. I continue to support Tim and Bonnie regardless, because I value what they are doing.
When you learn to be civil, let us know. You may call me Reverend Donoghue from now on. How is that? Does having a "name" really make you feel better?
Tim King: Well then I say we should all get along and keep the dialog going.
Martin November 21, 2011 10:52 am (Pacific time)
Mt. Johnson let's be honest,
That's an interesting comment coming from you, who has been posting under more than twenty different names since last April
Karin Rougeau November 21, 2011 7:40 am (Pacific time)
To anonymous 001
If you, a more regular reader and apparently you comment more often than I do, feel that way, then I'm sure I don't want to wade into said waters either.
Seems a sad state of affairs when people can't comment without being rebuked from the author. Usually it is other people commenting that carry on like that.
I love reading comments and at times find better info in comments than the original article offered. :(
To Quoet Lily Tomlin..... Nevermind
Karin: I write to inform and enlighten people. When commenters offer disinformation, it's to everyone's advantage to correct them. Please note that in two and half years writing here, he is the only one who takes serious umbrage. Bearing in mind that he refuses to give a name, I consider him a troll.
Hank Ruark November 20, 2011 3:39 pm (Pacific time)
"Anon": Any person so focused on self as to deny others knowledge of who it is that speaks cannot claim to be capable of "educated comment" --no matter how many or what degrees nor span of life experiences. If one seeks the satisfactions of intellectual and social acceptance for what one can contribute and in the process share further in the continuous flow of those processes which truly constitute is life, first and original denial of self via seeking anonymity is the unavoidable slashing knife separating one from any part of that process. Heart-and-essence of democracy operate on those shared processes --anything delaying, damaging, denying or defiling them deserves only to become truly "anonymous".
Anonymous001 November 20, 2011 12:53 pm (Pacific time)
I would make an educated comment, but I am tired of the harassment Dan likes to poke at people who have contrary views.
Go ahead and make your comment. I won't add a thing to it, I promise.
[Return to Top]©2025 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.