Monday January 6, 2025
| |||||
SNc Channels: HomeNews by DateSportsVideo ReportsWeatherBusiness NewsMilitary NewsRoad ReportCannabis NewsCommentsADVERTISEStaffCompany StoreCONTACT USRSS Subscribe Search About Salem-News.com
Salem-News.com is an Independent Online Newsgroup in the United States, setting the standard for the future of News. Publisher: Bonnie King CONTACT: Newsroom@Salem-news.com Advertising: Adsales@Salem-news.com ~Truth~ ~Justice~ ~Peace~ TJP |
May-30-2011 17:03TweetFollow @OregonNews Obama is the wrong targetAlan Hart Salem-News.comHow could Israel is not a “Jewish state” when about a quarter of its citizens are Arabs and mainly Muslim?
(LONDON) - When I was reflecting on Netanyahu’s domination and control of the Congress of the United States of America, the first headline that came into my mind for this article was Goodbye to peace. I’ll now explain why I think the headline above is more appropriate. Because of its flirtation with the proposition that peace between an Israeli and Palestinian state must be based on pre-1967 borders with mutually agreed land swaps, President Obama’s speech on Middle East policy principles did one useful thing. And it was Ha-aretz’s Gideon Levy, the conscience of Israeli journalism, who put his finger most firmly on it. We should be grateful to Obama, he wrote, because his speech “exposed the naked truth - that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu does not want peace.” The Gentile me almost always agrees with Gideon but on this occasion, and leaving aside the fact that it was Netanyahu’s rejection of what Obama said initially that exposed the naked truth, I think Gideon’s version of it needs two clarifications. One is that the truth was exposed like never before only to those who have not been brainwashed by Zionist propaganda - only a minority of Americans, for example. The other boils down to this. What Netanyahu does want, and only because of his concern about Israel’s growing isolation in the world, is peace on Zionism’s terms, which means the Palestinians giving up their struggle for an acceptable minimum of justice and accepting crumbs from Zionism’s table in the shape of three or four Bantustatans on about 40% of the West Bank, and which they could call a state if they wished. That’s what Netanyahu meant but did not say when, at his arrogant, insufferably self-righteous and devious best, he assured both houses of the U.S. Congress that “We’ll be generous about the size of the Palestinian state.” Put another way, what Netanyahu doesn’t want is peace on terms the vast majority of Palestinians and most other Arabs and Muslims could accept - a complete end to Israel’s 1967 occupation and a contiguous and viable Palestinian mini state on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, with Jerusalem an open city and the capital of two states. The only question of interest about Netanyahu is this. Does he really believe the nonsense he speaks about the alleged threats to Israel’s security or is he a smooth-talking but diabolical salesman, selling what he knows to be Zionist propaganda lies as truth? Obama’s speech also exposed (again) the weakness of his own position on policy matters for Israel/Palestine when he said: “Ultimately it is up to the Israelis and the Palestinians to take action. No peace can be imposed upon them - not by the United States, not by anybody else.” As things are that means Israel remains free to continue its criminal ways: - defying UN Security Council resolutions and international law; - pushing ahead with more and more illegal settlements to consolidate its hold on those parts of occupied West Bank it intends to keep for ever; - oppressing the occupied Palestinians in the hope that, out of complete despair, they will either give up their struggle for an acceptable minimum amount of justice and be prepared to accept crumbs from Zionism’s table or, better still from Zionism’s perspective, will abandon their homeland and seek a new life elsewhere in the Arab world and beyond; and - resorting to state terrorism (attacks on neighbouring Arab countries and possibly Iran) whenever its leaders feel the need to impose their will on the region. Because of Israel’s dependence on the U.S. in a number of ways, not the least of them being the American veto of Security Council resolutions not to Israel’s liking, Obama does have the leverage to impose a Middle East peace on terms that would provide the Palestinians with an acceptable amount of justice without any risk to Israel’s security. And there’s a very compelling case for saying he ought to do so if only to best protect America’s own interests. I believe Obama knows this, so the question of real interest about him is this. Why won’t he act? The answer of almost all of his critics who call and campaign in various ways for justice for the Palestinians is that he’s a willing tool of the Zionist lobby. I don’t believe this to be the case. I think the reality of Obama’s position was best summed up by Professor John J. Mearsheimer. To Al Jazeera recently he said this: “ The sad fact is that Obama has remarkably little manoeuvre room on the foreign policy front. The most important item on his agenda is settling the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and there he knows what has to be done: Push both sides toward a two-state solution, which is the best outcome for all the parties, including the United States. Indeed, he has been trying to do just that since he took office in January 2009. But the remarkably powerful Israel lobby makes it virtually impossible for him to put meaningful pressure on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is committed to creating a Greater Israel in which the Palestinians are restricted to a handful of disconnected and impoverished enclaves. And Obama is certainly not going to buck the lobby - with the 2012 presidential election looming larger every day... The bottom line is that the US is in deep trouble in the Middle East and needs new policies for that region. But regrettably there is little prospect of that happening anytime soon. All of this is to say that there was no way that Obama could do anything but disappoint with Thursday’s speech, because he is trapped in an iron cage.” This cage is, of course, the Zionist lobby’s control through its many stooges in Congress of policy for Israel-Palestine. It’s the cage in which post Eisenhower every American president has been trapped. As former ambassador Chas Freeman put it in a recent interview with Russia Today, Israeli leaders don’t have to listen to the president because they know their lobby can block him in Congress. And that’s why, despite the fact that like Ilan Pappe I am sick and tired of Obama’s rhetoric, I’ve come to the conclusion that no useful purpose is served by supporters of justice for the Palestinians attacking him. He’s the wrong target. The right target is America’s pork-barrel system of politics which puts what passes for democracy up for sale to the highest bidders. In this context I say, have always said, that I don’t blame the Zionist lobby for playing the game the way it does. It is only playing by the rules. It’s the rules that need to be changed if Obama in a second term, or any future American president, is going to be able to escape from the cage and use the leverage he has to oblige Israel to be serious about peace on terms virtually all Palestinians and most other Arabs and Muslims everywhere could accept. Some members of Congress who applauded Netanyahu in a scene that reminded me of the enthusiasm for Hitler at Nazi rallies accused Obama of betraying Israel. There has indeed been a betrayal, but what has been betrayed is democracy in America. The many members of Congress who read from Zionism’s script and dance to its tune in order to secure election campaign funds and organized Jewish votes in tight races are not merely stooges. Because they are putting the interests of a foreign power above those of their own country, it’s time to call them what they really are - traitors. In my view exposing them as such should be given the highest priority by all who campaign in various ways for justice for the Palestinians and peace for all. Memo to all concerned in Congress and the White House. Israel is not a “Jewish state”. How could it be when about a quarter of its citizens are Arabs and mainly Muslim? Israel is a Zionist state. It will only be a Jewish state when it has completed its ethnic cleansing program. ___________________________________
Alan Hart is a former ITN and BBC Panorama foreign correspondent who covered wars and conflicts wherever they were taking place in the world and specialized in the Middle East. Author of Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews, Vol. 1: The False Messiah. He blogs on AlanHart.net, and tweets on twitter.com/alanauthor See also: President Obama’s opportunity to speak truth to power: Part 1 President Obama’s opportunity to speak truth to power – Rahm Emanuel does it for him – Part 11 Open Letter to President Obama: Change the Rules of the Game An Appeal to the American People Alan's arrival in America in mid May for a month will be on the heels of the publication of Volume 3 of the American edition of his epic book, Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews. The sub-title of this volume is Conflict Without End? It takes the story from the 1967 war and the creation of Greater Israel to the present and the question: Is Peace Possible? Will President Obama be allowed to deliver an acceptable amount of justice for the Palestinians in order to achieve peace for all and, if not, what’s the most likely future for the region and the world? Reviews: "... immensely readable and a magnificent piece of work ..." "... elucidates the dangers involved in the unconditional Western support for Zionism and its oppressive policies against the Palestinians." "... principled, ... historical, ... excellent, even heroic, in effort and scope." Over more than four decades Alan Hart enjoyed intimate access to, and on the human level friendship with, leaders of both sides including Golda Meir, Mother Israel, and Yasser Arafat,Father Palestine. (Others included Moshe Dayan, Shimon Peres, Nasser, Sadat, King Faisal, King Hussein—the list is long). He also participated at a leadership level in the secret politics of the search for peace in the Middle East (as an intermediary between Arafat and Peres when it was presumed that Peres was headed for leadership). Articles for May 29, 2011 | Articles for May 30, 2011 | Articles for May 31, 2011 | Support Salem-News.com: googlec507860f6901db00.html Quick Links
DININGWillamette UniversityGoudy Commons Cafe Dine on the Queen Willamette Queen Sternwheeler MUST SEE SALEMOregon Capitol ToursCapitol History Gateway Willamette River Ride Willamette Queen Sternwheeler Historic Home Tours: Deepwood Museum The Bush House Gaiety Hollow Garden AUCTIONS - APPRAISALSAuction Masters & AppraisalsCONSTRUCTION SERVICESRoofing and ContractingSheridan, Ore. ONLINE SHOPPINGSpecial Occasion DressesAdvertise with Salem-NewsContact:AdSales@Salem-News.com | |||
Contact: adsales@salem-news.com | Copyright © 2025 Salem-News.com | news tips & press releases: newsroom@salem-news.com.
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy |
All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.
Anonymous June 1, 2011 8:30 am (Pacific time)
ALtho I would change the heading of this article from "obama is not the target" to: "obama is not the only target"
Anonymous June 1, 2011 8:28 am (Pacific time)
I read these posts from israel supporters, then do some research, and find its all propaganda, with no factual foundation. Seriously, I am not taking sides in this post, all I am doing is stating a fact. After reading hundreds of israel support blogs/posts, and researching their words, not once was there any truth. And "my cousin was killed"? Come on, give me a break. How about, "my entire family and all relatives were killed"? They werent, but see how easy I could spout out stuff too? As far as the U.N. Who the heck are they? Nothing but a tool of the globalists to complete their goal of world domination, and slavery of 99% of the population. That IS a fact. Do the research. There are some non israel supporters that post crud too, maybe 20% or so. But the israel support posts have been 100% inaccurate propaganda. I also am aware, that israel is spending millions to pay people to post propaganda. While people such as Tim King, have to rely on small private donations to get the truth out. Its all making sense to me now. It should be making sense to everyone now.
Jewish and Ashamed May 30, 2011 8:41 pm (Pacific time)
@ Arthur Cohn... leaping at ad hominum attacks on Gideon Levy cannot hide the truth that Levy is a patriotic journalist and commentator of the highest order. He, like others, is a canary in the coal mine whose message is ignored at the peril of the Israeli state.
Jewish and Ashamed May 30, 2011 8:34 pm (Pacific time)
Israeli's exaggerate the threat from so-called terrorists, and they fail to realize how their actions have caused resentment, violence, passive resistance and various non-violent actions to throw off the yoke of barbaric and inhuman acts perpetrated by Jewish religious zealot settlers and their government. And, yes when you speak of the death of Israeli’s at the hands of what you call terrorists, remember what the Israeli government has done to perpetuate and even initiate violence in Palestine for their own ends. All the obfuscation and hasbarac contortions cannot explain away the deaths of Palestinian civilians or the corruption of Israeli government organs bent on a Kafkaesque dehumanization of the Palestine people. The world knows and Americans in particular---given our own history of de jure and de facto discriminations that heaped humiliation on top of humiliation on Black Americans and robbed them of their humanity and inalienable rights---certainly have no trouble seeing the entrenchment of such barbarisms in Israeli society. But this shall not stand, for in the end the light of truth inevitably shines on all such barbaric and mendacious governments and peoples. The world cannot afford to let Israel determine the fate of the Palestinian people.
Natalia May 30, 2011 7:34 pm (Pacific time)
I'm sorry, but my cousin died in a terrorist attack in Jerusalem which was caused by Arabs. There is a definite danger to Israel. However, the point of your article seems to be that you don't care about what happens to it, so it doesn't make a difference to you, anyway.
morbo May 30, 2011 6:24 pm (Pacific time)
In case you don't know Jews don't have rights in Arab countries. When they say "remember Kaybar", they forget that the Jews remember every last detail of Kaybar, and Amalek, and Auschwitz.
Arthur Cohn May 30, 2011 6:19 pm (Pacific time)
Gideon Levy is commonly regarded in Israel as the very worst of the HaAretz hate-Israel commentators. Haart, who depends on Levy for his opinion, has it all wrong. 1) Israel = Jewish state. UN resolution called for an Arab and a Jewish State. That Jewish State was later named Israel. It is still the Jewish State called for in the resolution. There are many States that are called Arsb State in their name. Some of them allow non-Arabs to be citizens. 2) Israel wants peace. Inthe Hamas Charter, and in the Fatah Charter it is written that their goal is to destroy "the Zionist State". Their current means to accomplish this goal are Lawfare, propaganda, and terrorism. Israel is doing its best in trying to protect its citizens from terror attacks. Hart is doing his best on destroying Israel via propaganda.
Anonymous May 30, 2011 5:48 pm (Pacific time)
its doesnt matter if the zionist belive the security threat is real or not. Of cource they will play every angle. The US protection of Israel is a security threat to the US. The issue exposes the inept and corrupt congress who will support anyone who pays them.
[Return to Top]©2025 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.