Tuesday December 12, 2017
SNc Channels:

Search
About Salem-News.com

 

May-29-2011 22:56printcomments

Conduct Based on Belief

The fact remains, Isaiah’s Prophecy is the basis for the plan of the Christian Church and, in my opinion, is the most honest, albeit Isaiah is not without fanciful expressions in his own right.

Open Bible
Courtesy: livinghopesaginaw.org

(PASO ROBLES, Calif.) - Most of what I was taught about religion in my early years conflicted with what I learned in college..

It was a dilemma I couldn't ignore, so I began with my givens, beliefs passed down from one generation to the next by respected elders, usually to children who accept them as true and pass them along in turn. I chose to believe only what was logical to resolve my confusion about the mysteries of Christ.

Using historical fact, and knowledge born of experience, I turned to the Book of Isaiah, the earliest of the prophets and the most reliable source of Biblical lore regarding the role of Jesus and the rise of Christianity; it changed my life.

Each of us is a product of what we have been taught or learned, be it religion or otherwise, and we act according to how we perceive truth, by whether we accommodate to religious concepts, or others, by choosing to commit to them whole heartedly.

Commitment to religion and/or desire is applicable to all levels of human experience, but accommodation is based on logic not emotion or blind allegiance; both choices determine why we think and act as we do.

The significance of the Book of Isaiah is that it is Part of the Old Testament; it begins on P. 529 of my Bible. The New Testament begins on P. 756; 227 pages after the Book of Isaiah. Yet Isaiah’s Book introduces the coming of Christ and the rise of Christianity in terms which often differ materially from the Gospels of the New Testament written one hundred years after the fact. The Christian leadership took the thread provided by Isaiah and wove it into the so-called Gospels to suit their wildest imaginations....

Though they differ, there is no doubt the New drew upon the Old to tell its version of Christ and the rise of the Catholic Church, the One God of All the People vs. the One God of the Jewish Nation, a difference which the architects of the New Testament - a cult within the Jewish Community - designed to replace the Old with an audacity becoming the best minds of those who managed to bring their plan to fruition.

The fact remains, Isaiah’s Prophecy is the basis for the plan of the Christian Church and, in my opinion, is the most honest, albeit Isaiah is not without fanciful expressions in his own right. He speaks of Jesus without naming him, as the one who will arrive on the scene in about a year, after he has received instruction from the Coterie whose philosophy he is expected to accept and teach; a man who will call on Isaiah’s name, the Prophet whose Prophecy elevated the essential man as the instrument of investiture of the Christian Church while condemning him to die as its namesake.

Jesus was named Christ just days before his crucifixion, and only after he finally committed to his role to die to become the symbol of Christianity. But it is the philosophy of the architects - the Christian Coterie whose plan it was, that Isaiah refers to as Lord or God - the real God of Christianity. Jesus was called Lord and God also, but only because he was the Word supposedly made flesh who emerged for the purpose of spreading the Word; i.e., the philosophy of the Coterie whose instruction taught Jesus what to do and say.

In this sense, Son of God is understood, but in another sense the Son of God could refer to the fact Jesus, a Jew, emerges from Judaism, the first God of the Three Religions of the Book, to become the Christian divinity, the Second God via the New Testament bound in the Bible along with the Old, hence Jesus was the Son of Jehovah. The architects of Christianity might disagree, but who can say for sure? The Third of the Religions of the Book is the Koran of Islam which emerged in the Seventh Century, A.D.

When comparing the Book of Isaiah against the Gospels, Isaiah is notable as much for it does not say as for what it does. Isaiah says nothing about the birth of Christ - a babe lying in a manger, no crib for his bed - or anything associated with the Christian story which is a figment of the imagination of those who wrote the Gospels.

The same is true of the Immaculate Conception; it never happened. But Isaiah was very precise in describing the final days of Jesus leading up to his crucifixion, and prior events leading up to his demise. Recently there was found what is called the Judas Gospel which confirms that Judas was not a traitor to the cause, but an essential player in the scheme leading to the final act, the death of Jesus (Christ).

I recommend strongly that Isaiah be read thoroughly and thoughtfully before committing to the persuasion of Evangelicals who too often make up stories to beguile their audiences. As the first, Isaiah is the most reliable of the stories of the beginning of Christianity; the Gospels are merely hearsay based on obvious flights of imagination not unlike that which says Barack Obama was not born in America and is, therefore, an illegitimate President.

Santa Clause is a fantasy too, but I know of no child who finally learned the Truth who couldn’t handle it logically and accommodating to it comfortably. As adults we it owe to ourselves to accept the truth and deal with it honestly. It is less painful than you might expect and will open your eyes to another world in which honesty eventually will become policy.

It is much too important, especially now, when politicians rely on what they hope will be a Christian base committed to the Republican Party (of God), a fictitious cognomen, a nickname, by which its leadership hopes to regain the Presidency by any and all means at it disposal, and our expense.

_________________________________________________________

Kenneth G. Ramey is a member of Salem-News.com's original team of writers, he generates provocative articles on the subject of religion and world affairs. We are pleased that Ken's "lone wolf" presence as a writer in the world has been replaced by a spot on our team of writers at Salem-News.com. Raised in Minnesota and California during the dark years of the Great American Depression, Ken is well suited to talk about the powerful forces in the world that give all of us hope and tragedy and everything in between. You can write to Ken at: darken1@sbcglobal.net




Comments Leave a comment on this story.
Name:

All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.



Colli May 31, 2011 7:07 pm (Pacific time)

All writings . . . scripture or otherwise, were written by men. This fact alone makes them prone to errors and interpretation. Humans are fallible afterall. Add to this the number of translations from the original ancient languages in which they were written and the likelihood of errors is multiplied. Now take that and adjust it to allow for the potential for writing with a personal slant to force the reader into a desired information and/or belief channel and we can begin to understand why so much arguement and disagreement surrounds the written word. How much is fact? . . . how much is fiction? . . . and how much is unlabeled opinion?
Ken's perception is probably as valid as anyone elses . . . if not more so! Remember, ALL religions and ALL churches were developed by man. While a Great Spirit or Creator may exist and all religions claim Him or Her under different names, who is to say that He or She would approve of such claim-staking?


qui vive May 30, 2011 8:38 pm (Pacific time)

Such far ranging comments seem intended to defeat Ramey's article, not refute it. It just makes sense that the definition Isaiah gives, which the Gospels mimic in the name of Jesus, implies Isaiah and the Gospels were speaking of the same person; Isaiah in the first person and the Gospels after the fact each buildin upon the one before. Doesn't this make sense?


Anonymous May 30, 2011 3:23 pm (Pacific time)

Mr Ramey has not done his homework and has not realized the education system, especially the university education system was taken over back in the early 1900's by liars and thieves. The rockefellers and rothchilds. and they are still here today. There is a scripture where the "evil one" took Jesus on a mountain top. Showed Him the world, said to him, "I will give you all of this, if you bow down and worship me" Jesus said NO. THe Rockefellers/Rothchilds/queen of England/the Crown/etc...


Jesus Padilla May 30, 2011 6:20 am (Pacific time)

I read this article hoping it would be interesting and thought provoking but was disappointed. Essentially what Mr. Ramey is saying is that the new testament must be false because all of its reported events were putatively not foretold by the prophet Isaiah many years prior (or possibly written down by the autho(s) of the book of Isaiah). On this basis he rejects the New Testament? Come on Salem.


Rehmat May 30, 2011 6:26 am (Pacific time)

First of all, the Jewish claim that the current Old Testament (Torah) is the true Revelation received by Moses or other Biblical prophets – is debatable. The Old Testament was written between 1500-2000 years after the death of Moses, based on Hebrew forelocks. OT is certainly not the ‘Word of God’ as the RC Church teaches its followers.

None of the stories (the so-called ‘prophecies’) in the Book of Isaiah (50:6, 53:5, 53:7 and 53:12) had to do with Jesus. For example, Isaiah 53:7 says: “He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth; he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he openeth NOT his mouth”. However, according to Mark 14:61-62; Luke 22:70; John 18:37 and Matthew27:11 – Jesus did open his mouth and replied to all the questions put to him by the high priests and by Pilate.

I believe that Jews and Christians – who don’t have the time to have an unbaised study of the Old Testament (Jewish Bible) or the New Testament (Christian Bible) or the most holly book of Jews, the Talmud – have no other alternative but to follow their rabbis and priests blindly. Islam, on the other hand, has set its Believers free to question an Ayatullah or Sheikh or Mufti – whose interpretation of Islam – he or she find not according to Holy Qur’an or the Seerah of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh).

http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/01/10/searching-for-jesus-as-eh/


STFU May 30, 2011 12:09 am (Pacific time)

http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/2011/05/if-world-supports-arab-spring-shouldnt.html

[Return to Top]
©2017 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.


Articles for May 28, 2011 | Articles for May 29, 2011 | Articles for May 30, 2011
Donate to Salem-News.com and help us keep the news flowing! Thank you.

Since 1985, Tattoo Mike is one of the most reputable tattoo artists in Oregon.

Support
Salem-News.com:


Annual Hemp Festival & Event Calendar

Call 503-362-6858 to Order Ahead  or for Party Reservations!