Monday June 17, 2019
SNc Channels:

Search
About Salem-News.com

 

Jun-12-2010 03:05printcomments

Muslim Author Agron Belica Says the Prophet Yahya Was Not Celibate

“The Quran does not support the celibacy of the prophet Yahya,” says Belica.

Agron Belica's book The Revival of the Prophet Yahya
Visit: IslamMattersNow.com to learn more

(BOSTON) - For centuries, Muslims have assumed that John the Baptist (Yahya), like Jesus, never married or sired children. This is in accordance with Christian tradition, but, Belica argues, there is no cogent reason for Muslims to accept this belief. On the contrary, he says, this view of Yahya is inconsistent with the text of the Quran.

In his “The Revival of the Prophet Yahya,” he writes: “The word ‘hasur’ used in the Quran (Q. 3:39), which is usually translated ‘chaste,’ is a misinterpretation. My research shows that the Arabic word hasur does not mean ‘chaste’ with regard to Yahya; rather, it means ‘a concealer [of secrets].’

Why the mistake in translation and commentary? As there was no extensive information given in the Quran about the life of Prophet Yahya nor in the Tradition (hadith), the commentators then turned to Christian tradition and simply repeated what they found there.”

Nonetheless, the commentators of the Quran have placed considerable emphasis on this word.

Al-Tabari interprets the word “hasur” to mean one who abstains from sexual intercourse with women. He then reports a Tradition on the authority of Said ibn al-Musayyab which has Prophet Muhammad saying the following: “Everyone of the sons of Adam shall come on the Day of Resurrection with a sin (of sexual impropriety) except Yahya bin Zechariah.’ Then, picking up a tiny straw, he continued, ‘this is because his generative organ was no bigger then this straw (implying that he was impotent).’”

Does this mean that even the prophets outside of Yahya will be raised up with this sin of sexual impropriety? How can we accept that this was said by such a modest human being, comparing a straw to another prophet's generative organ? Was Yahya impotent?

One commentator, Ibn Kathir, a renowned Islamic scholar, rejects this view and adds, “This would be a defect and a blemish unworthy of prophets.” He then mentions that it was not that he had no sexual relations with women, but that he had no illegal sexual relations with them. Indeed, the whole discussion is unseemly.

It is known that prophets of God are immune from major sins, so this statement makes no sense at all when interpreting the word, hasur.

In addition, I would like to mention the fact that in his commentary, Ibn Kathir says he (Yahya) probably married and had children. He said this on the basis of what was related in the Quran of the prayer of Zachariah.

There are several reasons why interpreting hasur in this context as “chaste” or “celibate,” as has been done by some commentators, is a misinterpretation: First of all, there is another word in the Quran for “chaste” and that is “muhsin.” As God used a different word with hasur, it must mean something different.

Secondly, God says in the Quran that Islam did not bring monasticism but that it was something that they (the Christians) invented. (Q. 57:27) Also, And verily We sent messengers (to mankind) before thee, and We appointed for them wives and offspring, and it was not given to any messenger that he should bring a portent save by God’s leave. For everything there is a time prescribed. (Q. 13:38) This is definitely not a recommendation for monasticism. Furthermore, we find in the Traditions that the Prophet said that there is no monasticism in Islam. Therefore, God would not have sent a Prophet who was celibate. In addition, it is contrary the exhortation in the Torah to “go forth and multiply.”

Thirdly, Yahya’s father, Zechariah prayed for a protector who would provide descendants (dhurriyah) for his family. There Zachariah called to his Lord; he said: My Lord! Bestow on me good offspring from Thy presence; truly Thou art hearing supplication. (Q. 3:38)

God gave him Yahya. God would not have sent a son to Zechariah who would not carry on the line of Jacob’s descendants because then God would not have answered the prayer of Zechariah.

The word hasur is used only one time in the Quran and that is in regard to the Prophet Yahya. A major Arabic-English lexicon, that of Edward William Lane (Taj al-Arus) states that when 'hasur' is used alone, it means “concealer [of secrets].”

In his translation, of Ibn al-Arabi's Book of the Fabulous Gryphon, Elmore also translates the Arabic hasur “as concealer [of secrets].” In the referenced passage, “chaste” would not have been appropriate (Gerald T. Elmore, Islamic Sainthood in the Fullness of Time, Brill 1999, P. 482)”

The full text of “The Revival of the Prophet Yahya” may be found on the website www.islammattersnow.com.

“Candid words form an Unusual and Fascinating Author on Religion.” See Geri Ahearn interview at www.Salem-News.com




Comments Leave a comment on this story.
Name:

All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.



Daniel Johnson January 16, 2013 7:50 pm (Pacific time)

There is no shortage of errors and mistranslations on the Christian side.
For example, Mary was not a “virgin”. The Hebrew word in Isaiah is “almah” which means young woman with no implication of virginity. Biblical scholars know this and do not dispute it. The mutation creeps in when the pre-Christian Greek translation known as the Septuagint rendered almah into the Greek parthenos which usually does mean virgin. It is widely accepted among Christian scholars that the story of the virgin birth of Jesus was a late interpolation, put in presumably by Greek-speaking disciples in order that the (mistranslated) prophecy should be seen to be fulfilled.


rehana kosur January 16, 2013 2:45 pm (Pacific time)

I dont think emphasising too much on the topic of wether prophet yahya peace be upon was celebate or not is formost important what is practising the basics of islam at least.and allah almighty knows best.

Editor:  It is important to Agron Belica because it contradicts the Holy Qur'an, and it's a misinterpretation.  The evidence is all there, you can see for yourself.  To be honest, I don't think anyone's going to challenge this.   


freddy C. June 22, 2010 4:04 pm (Pacific time)

This guy just smashed the Islamic tradition on John the Baptist. WOW!!!!!!!!!!!


gp June 12, 2010 11:07 am (Pacific time)

Do I care about the sexual practices of dead, religious icons esteemed by any of the sexist Abrahamic cults? As the poet Lynn Jeffress famously said: "religion, like sex, is private and should be kept in the bedroom or the bathroom".


ruby troy June 12, 2010 9:24 am (Pacific time)

the truth of GOD will prevail


Peter June 12, 2010 5:52 am (Pacific time)

Very interesting..... Worth looking into


AGRON BELICA June 12, 2010 5:43 am (Pacific time)

"They try to put the light of God out with there mouths, but God makes it ever brighter" (HQ) Salem-News.com is the best news on the web!

[Return to Top]
©2019 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.


Articles for June 11, 2010 | Articles for June 12, 2010 | Articles for June 13, 2010
Support
Salem-News.com:

Annual Hemp Festival & Event Calendar

Donate to Salem-News.com and help us keep the news flowing! Thank you.

googlec507860f6901db00.html
Your customers are looking: Advertise on Salem-News.com!