Wednesday January 8, 2025
| |||
SNc Channels: HomeNews by DateSportsVideo ReportsWeatherBusiness NewsMilitary NewsRoad ReportCannabis NewsCommentsADVERTISEStaffCompany StoreCONTACT USRSS Subscribe Search About Salem-News.com
Salem-News.com is an Independent Online Newsgroup in the United States, setting the standard for the future of News. Publisher: Bonnie King CONTACT: Newsroom@Salem-news.com Advertising: Adsales@Salem-news.com ~Truth~ ~Justice~ ~Peace~ TJP |
Feb-07-2009 16:35TweetFollow @OregonNews House, Not Senate, Economic Package Would Ease Health Care SqueezeSalem-News.comOregon Center for Public Policy says it affects abbout 51,000 unemployed, low-income Oregonians.
(SILVERTON, Ore.) - The economic recovery package approved by the U.S. House of Representatives -- but not the version still under consideration in the Senate -- would extend Medicaid health coverage to the families of some 51,000 unemployed, low-income Oregonians, according to a new study out today. Less than half, or 44 percent, of low-income Oregonians who've lost their jobs have health insurance through a former employer, a public program or private insurer, according to the report by Families USA, a national consumer advocacy group. "Many struggling Oregon families lacking health coverage could benefit from the House bill, so it's important that the final legislation include this extension of Medicaid," said Janet Bauer, policy analyst with the Oregon Center for Public Policy, who reviewed the study. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, which cleared the U.S. House of Representatives last week, would allow states to extend Medicaid coverage to laid-off low-income workers in households with incomes below 200 percent of poverty. The poverty level varies according to family size. For a family of three, households with yearly income below $36,620 could be eligible for the program if it becomes law. The House plan would be temporary but fully funded by the federal government, said Bauer. Under the legislation, Oregon would have the option to extend its Medicaid-funded Oregon Health Plan to these workers through 2010. Recognizing that states are strapped for revenues, the federal government would pay all of the costs of coverage, waiving the usual state-match requirement. The Medicaid provision would inject significant federal dollars into Oregon's struggling economy with virtually no cost to the state," Bauer stressed. "It's just what the economy's doctor is ordering for Oregon's revenue shortfall and high unemployment." The extension addresses the gap in health coverage that many laid-off workers fall into, according to Bauer. She noted that the Oregon Health Plan is closed to many low-income individuals, who typically cannot afford to buy private coverage or continue the health insurance they had with their former employer. "The temporary Medicaid extension would prevent tens of thousands of Oregonians from falling through the cracks of our health care system, thus bolstering the health of families and the economic productivity of our state in the long run," said Bauer. While the Senate has yet to take a final vote on the economic recovery legislation, the draft currently under consideration does not include funds for states to insure laid-off workers below 200 percent of poverty. "When it comes to helping those Oregonians who've lost their health coverage during this recession, the House legislation is clearly superior," said Bauer. "Let's hope that the final version of the package includes these provisions." The Oregon Center for Public Policy is a non-partisan research institute that does in-depth research and analysis on budget, tax and economic issues. The Center's goal is to improve decision making and generate more opportunities for all Oregonians. Source: ocpp.org Articles for February 6, 2009 | Articles for February 7, 2009 | Articles for February 8, 2009 | Support Salem-News.com: googlec507860f6901db00.html | |
Contact: adsales@salem-news.com | Copyright © 2025 Salem-News.com | news tips & press releases: newsroom@salem-news.com.
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy |
All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.
ChrisJones February 9, 2009 2:50 pm (Pacific time)
In the future the saying will go it takes an Obama to get a Lew Rockwell...or maybe it'll be Paul/Shiff in 2012? Time will tell.
ChrisJones February 9, 2009 2:47 pm (Pacific time)
You can bet the farm that the new party is going to be libertarian, in the flavor or jeffersonian classical liberalism.
ChrisJones February 9, 2009 2:41 pm (Pacific time)
Re: my previous comment--One could easily present the argument that Ron Paul single handedly (indirectly with the help of bush) broke the back of the nearly self-destructed GOP, which is now in a wheelchair paralyzed from the waist down. A new party must rise to take its place.
ChrisJones February 9, 2009 2:24 pm (Pacific time)
Henry I disagree with this statement right here "wit, wisdom and will of the nation writ large and bright on Nov. 4"....I think his 3 year- nearly one billion dollar campaign (slick marketing blitz)may have helped him a little as well as partially (temporarily I might add) hijacking Ron Paul's authentic grassroots (without major corporate sponsorship) movement for real change....and after all that he barely even beat mccain by that much. (definately far from landslide status) And the thing is mccain was one of the worst gop candidates in history on top of the fact that a vote for him was basically a vote for bush 3, and this is even while bush held the LOWEST approval rating in polling history. The only one less popular than mccain was hillary. If the RP supporters would've compromised their morals (instead of sitting this election out) and voted for mccain he would've won by a long shot in my opinion.
Henry Ruark February 8, 2009 3:14 pm (Pacific time)
"Anon": Your questions show complete incomprehension of the measure(s) under examination in D.C. now. The funds involved do not go in any way to individuals to whom your queries would appply but only to agencies and organizations via very close definition and intense supervision, you can be sure, by all those to whom ANY federal expenditure is a dangerous act to be delayed and defeated if at all possible. That is due to the same kinds of incomprehension you demonstrate here,for which the only comprehensive answer is far better information flow to citizens who are far better prepared to receive and understand. We neglect that phenomenally necessary democratic action at our continuing peril, as the past three decades have surely demonstrated in depth and degradation, now approaching a deep Depression --again !!
Henry Ruark February 8, 2009 1:18 pm (Pacific time)
To all: There's still time to support and preserve what is absolutely essential, and included in the House version. Let your voices be heard, loud and clear and repeated for everyone you can reach in D.C. The GOP is out "to starve the beast" and wil cheap, rapid victory vs President Obama, negating wit, wisdom and will of the nation writ large and bright on Nov. 4. See current Op Ed for more detail on this crucial choice.
Anonymous February 8, 2009 7:55 am (Pacific time)
Does anyone no if this bill requires proof of citizenship? Do they match income in future time periods to verify income? Is their statutes with teeth to prosecute fraud?
[Return to Top]©2025 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.