Tuesday January 21, 2020
SNc Channels:

About Salem-News.com


Dec-24-2013 01:32printcomments

Tell the NY Times: The Evidence Isn't Hard to Find... If You Just Look

All they need to do is look and they’ll easily find it. Contact the NY Times Today!

9/11 attacks

(LONDON) - Yesterday New York Times Chief Washington Correspondent David Sanger was the guest on CSPAN’s Washington Journal, where he had this to say about Building 7’s collapse:

“We have not found any evidence so far – that doesn’t mean there’s none there – but we’ve not found any evidence so far to suggest that the building collapses were caused by anything other than the two airplanes that flew into them.”

Sanger was responding to a question from a caller who wanted to know why, despite the massive billboard standing right outside the New York Times Building, the paper of record had failed to “fairly and objectively cover this crucial issue.”

Now with a senior representative of the New York Times on the record saying, “We’ve not found any evidence so far,” it is time to let Sanger and the editors know that the evidence is there. All they need to do is look and they’ll easily find it. Contact the NY Times Today!

Contact the NY Times Today

Last week over 1,000 people contacted the BBC in response to our action alert regarding the BBC’s one-sided article on the ReThink911 campaign. Let’s surpass that level of support today. Please take 2 minutes right now to contact David Sanger and the NY Times editors. Just copy-paste the letter below, or write your own. Please be sure to Bcc us at AE911Truth so that we can keep a count of how many emails are sent.

To: dasang@nytimes.com, washington@nytimes.com, metro@nytimes.com, national@nytimes.com, executive-editor@nytimes.com, nytnews@nytimes.com, editorial@nytimes.com

Bcc: NYTimesOutreach@AE911Truth.org

Dear Mr. Sanger and Editors of the New York Times,

On Sunday, December 23, 2013, you, Mr. Sanger, told a caller on CSPAN’s Washington Journal that the New York Times had not found any evidence so far to suggest that the collapse of WTC Building 7 was caused by anything other than an indirect result of the airplanes flying into the Twin Towers. I am writing to tell you that the evidence is indeed there, and I urge you to look into it. 2,100 architects and engineers have signed a petition at AE911Truth.org calling for a new investigation based on this evidence. The following points are just a few from among the growing body of evidence that overwhelmingly supports the conclusion that Building 7 came down by controlled demolition.

  • Building 7 accelerated downward at absolute free-fall for the first few seconds of its 7-second symmetrical collapse.
  • However, a building cannot undergo free-fall if it is meeting any resistance from any of the columns below it, as any resistance would slow the building’s descent.
  • Therefore, the lower section of the building could not have been “crushed” by the upper freely falling section.
  • The destruction of at least 8 stories of the lower section of the building had to have been accomplished by other means, i.e. explosives or incendiaries, to allow the upper section of the building to fall through it in free-fall. Learn more about the free-fall of Building 7.
  • There is clear evidence of melted steel at Building 7, first reported on by the NY Times, and incendiaries in numerous dust samples from Ground Zero.

As you well understand, the implications of the controlled demolition of Building 7 are extraordinary, since it is integral to the 9/11 events, and therefore the question of what happened to Building 7 is of the greatest importance. I thank you in advance for taking the time to seriously examine this crucial issue.


[Name, address]


Thank you as always for your tremendous support.!

About ReThink911

ReThink911 is sponsored by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a 501(c)3 non-profit organization, and Remember Building 7, a campaign by 9/11 family members to raise awareness of Building 7.

Donations are tax-deductible as allowed by codes and restrictions.

Visit ReThink911.org



Comments Leave a comment on this story.

All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.

Albury Smith December 25, 2013 7:23 am (Pacific time)

WTC 7's ~2.25 seconds at g began at t=1.75 seconds of the EXTERIOR collapse, and the entire 610' took ~8.5 seconds, not 7, so that's 2 inaccuracies in the statement that "Building 7 accelerated downward at absolute free-fall for the first few seconds of its 7-second symmetrical collapse." Molten METAL was reported in the WTC debris fires for months, and explosives don't even cause that in real controlled demolitions. Incendiaries are rarely used in demolition work, partly because they can't possibly be timed to the precision alleged here, and they begin cooling within 5 minutes, so they'd hardly have kept metal molten for months. Here's a suggestion for you, Scott, and ReThink9/11: In 2004, Consolidated Edison sued 7World Trade Company, L.P.. Silverstein Properties, Tishman Construction Corporation, and Irwin Cantor, WTC 7's structural engineer of record, for the 5:21 PM collapse that destroyed their costly substation under WTC 7. ConEd's claims against Tishman and Cantor were dismissed in January, 2006, and against 7WTC and Silverstein ~3 weeks ago. The question was whether negligence in design, construction, or management led to the collapse, and there was no mention in the lawsuit of secret controlled demolition. The allegations and litigants are all listed here: http://www.leagle.com/decision/In%20FCO%2020131204097 Why don't you enlighten Aegis Insurance Services, Inc. and ConEd's other insurers to this secret controlled demolition of WTC 7?

[Return to Top]
©2020 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.

Articles for December 23, 2013 | Articles for December 24, 2013 | Articles for December 25, 2013
The NAACP of the Willamette Valley

Your customers are looking: Advertise on Salem-News.com!

Sean Flynn was a photojournalist in Vietnam, taken captive in 1970 in Cambodia and never seen again.

Donate to Salem-News.com and help us keep the news flowing! Thank you.

Tribute to Palestine and to the incredible courage, determination and struggle of the Palestinian People. ~Dom Martin