Monday January 6, 2025
SNc Channels:

Search
About Salem-News.com

 

Dec-20-2011 22:05printcomments

Do Not Give Fluoridated Water to Babies or Pregnant Mothers

There is still not one single prospective double blinded randomized controlled trial of fluoridation.

Fluoride Linked to Pre-term Birth and Anemia in Pregnancy
From the article: Fluoride Linked to Pre-term Birth and Anemia in Pregnancy published by marvelous-girl.com

(WILSONVILLE, Ore.) - If you are upset with the lack of SEC (Securities Exchange Commission) oversight of Bernie Madoff, then fluoridation will break your heart. The incompetent oversight of Health and Human Services, CDC, EPA, and FDA CDER dwarfs the Madoff scandal. Those who have blind trust in all government regulators need not read further.

CONTAMINATED WASTE

Fluoridation is the process of adding a highly toxic industrial waste, often contaminated with lead and arsenic, to public water. In contrast, naturally occurring fluoride is usually calcium fluoride, about 800 times less toxic.

MOTHER’S MILK

In 2006 the CDC and others advised that infants should not consume fluoridated water. Fluoridated water contains around 200 times more fluoride than mother's milk and is not safe for infants. Caution: do not mix infant formula with fluoridated water. Salem water is not safe for infants.

Mother’s breast milk provides complete nutrition for babies and is virtually fluoride free. A baby’s kidneys are only about 20% developed and their blood brain barrier has not fully formed. Most babies are consuming some formula, often made with tap water, up to four times more liquids for their weight as do adults.

Below is an EPA (2011 DRA) graph. All the children above the black line are ingesting too much fluoride. The EPA has attempted to paint the best picture possible. EPA does not include infants younger than six months of age. EPA only includes 90% of the children and provides a 1:1 margin of safety (1:10 or 1:100 is standard). The EPA increased the RfD by 33% and failed to include total fluoride exposure. Even then, more than a quarter of children are ingesting too much fluoride.

FLUORIDE IS AN UNAPPROVED DRUG

The FDA requires fluoride toothpaste labels to say “Drug Facts” “Use a Pea Size” “Do Not Swallow.” There is 0.25 mg of fluoride in a pea-sized amount of fluoridated toothpaste, the same as in one glass of fluoridated water! The FDA CDER advises not to swallow the same amount of fluoride as the City of Salem forces everyone to swallow in each glass of water.

Washington and Idaho Boards of Pharmacy confirmed fluoride is a drug and FDA CDER before Congress testified that fluoride is a drug and unapproved. Pharmacists sell fluoride for ingestion only by prescription, and unapproved drugs are illegal drugs.

There is still not one single prospective double blinded randomized controlled trial of fluoridation. The ingestion of fluoride in any form for the prevention of dental caries has never been approved by the FDA CDER. HHS, CDC and EPA evade Congress supporting corporate interests based on biased historic science, not much better than witchcraft.

LACK OF BENEFIT

EPA scientists concluded: "The toxicity of fluoride is so great and the purported benefits are so small - if there are any at all - that requiring everyone to ingest it borders on criminal behavior on the part of government."

Graphing Iida’s data, finds an increase in dental fluorosis with increased fluoride (blue lines). Caries experience (red lines) finds virtually no benefit from fluoridation.

Colquhoun’s 1997 graph below shows a steady decline in dental caries regardless of fluoridation. We all agree fluoridation did not prevent dental caries before fluoridation started.

Compare developed countries of the world and fluoridation makes no difference. All have reduced dental caries to similar low levels.

Ranking states on the percentage of the whole population fluoridated finds no common cause. Fluoridation makes no difference.

How on earth do the CDC dentists protect their corporate fluoridating friends and claim for every dollar spent on fluoridation saves $38 in dentistry? Simple. When measured evidence doesn’t support policy, CDC dentists use estimates based on assumptions. Wouldn’t we all like to use estimates of assumptions to balance our check books or “prove” to our bosses we are worth our wages?

RISKS AND HARM

With little or no benefit, any risk or cost is unacceptable. CDC dentists claim safety by ignoring most risks.

Xiang in 2003 & 2005 published data illustrated below. An 8 IQ point drop with increased (0.04 ppm compared with 0.08 ppm) fasting blood serum fluoride concentrations, about half a standard deviation IQ drop throughout the entire population. Salem water is frying our brains.

The CDC reports less than 0.02 ppm fluoride serum concentration is “normal.” And studies find many have fluoride serum levels more than 10 times normal. What is your child’s serum fluoride concentration?

Ranking the states based on fluoridation and plotting the reported mental retardation rate confirms triple the number of mentally retarded (graph below), half a standard deviation.

25 human studies confirm ingesting fluoride damages the brain. The fetus and infants are most at risk.

Close to $1,000/yr less income is reported with each IQ point loss. With 180 million fluoridated in the USA, you do the math. The CDC dentists and HHS are unprecedented in their harm to the American public.

Dental fluorosis is an undisputed biomarker of excess fluoride ingestion, a toxic overdose and 41% of adolescents now have dental fluorosis. Repairs for dental fluorosis can cost over $1,000 per tooth, replaced about every 15 years.

Fluoride is an enzymatic reactor and the damage to cells, thyroid, kidneys, teeth, brains, GI tract, and bones has hundreds of published studies.

We do not give our consent to be fluoridated. If someone wants to ingest fluoride, they can disregard the FDA and swallow a pea size of toothpaste, but don’t force your neighbors to ingest the illegal fluoride drug.

More at www.fluoridealert.org; www.slweb.org, www.washingtonsafewater.com; www.fluorideresearch.org

Bill Osmunson DDS, MPH

Wilsonville, OR 97070

bill@teachingsmiles.com  

(Editor's note: To learn specific information about fluoride use in your local water, visit this about.com page and click on your state, the information will give your personal research a quick jump-start.)




Comments Leave a comment on this story.
Name:

All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.



Anonymous December 27, 2011 10:15 am (Pacific time)

You forgot to include Canada on the list of fluoridated countries.


picker22 December 26, 2011 11:35 pm (Pacific time)

Re NRC 2006 report

It is easy for readers to verify that the NRC found that there were only three health concerns at fluoride concentration about 6 times higher than the current target with sufficient valid science to effect national water purity standards. All endocrine worries including thyroid, cancer and the rest of a very long list were NOT included.

Readers can easily verify this by listening to the summary news conference.
The thyroid matter was specifically discussed there.

http://www.nap.edu/webcast/webcast_detail.php?webcast_id=325

Don't believe me . .listen yourselves!!


Bill Osmunson DDS, MPH December 26, 2011 2:58 pm (Pacific time)

Thank you for your comments. So much more could be added. I just again reviewed the NRC 2006 science on fluoride and the thyroid.
The NRC 2006 found reports that as little as 0.01 mgF/kgBW/day has measurable negative effect on the thyroid. For a 9 pound infant that would mean one quarter glass of water mixed with formula could be harmful,decreasing thyroid activity, increasing the chance of obesity and diabetes.

Fluoridation of public water is a serious risk for infants.


jwillie6 December 23, 2011 8:36 am (Pacific time)

This is an absolutely great summary of the dangers of fluoridation. Even if fluoride was helpful to teeth, distributing any drug in drinking water is the most expensive and wasteful method. As a Civil Engineer, I know that people drink only 1/2% (one-half percent) of the water they use. The remaining 99 ½ % of the water with this toxic fluoride chemical (Hexafluorosilicic acid) is dumped directly into the environment through the sewer system. For example, for every $1000 of fluoride chemical added to water, $995 would be directly wasted down the drain in toilets, showers, dishwashers, etc., $5 would be consumed in water by the people, and less than $0.50 (fifty cents) would be consumed by children, the target group for this outdated practice. That would be comparable to buying one gallon of milk, using six-and-one-half drops of it, and pouring the rest of the gallon in the sink. Fluoridation surely is in contention as the most wasteful government program. Giving away fluoride tablets free to anyone who wants them would be far cheaper and certainly more ethical, because then we would have the freedom to choose.


Anonymous December 21, 2011 8:09 am (Pacific time)

Yeh..all accurate info. I have been on this battle since 2006. Finally in January of 2011 salem/keizer at least reduced the amount about 30%. They are just throwing us a bone to shut us up for awhile, but its a start...Thanks for the article. Its a shame that my tax dollars buys this poison, they put it in the water, making me have to spend more for water filters...oh the irony and why am I not surprised.

[Return to Top]
©2025 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.


Articles for December 19, 2011 | Articles for December 20, 2011 | Articles for December 21, 2011
Special Section: Truth telling news about marijuana related issues and events.

Support
Salem-News.com:

googlec507860f6901db00.html

Annual Hemp Festival & Event Calendar

The NAACP of the Willamette Valley