Thursday January 9, 2025
| |||
SNc Channels: HomeNews by DateSportsVideo ReportsWeatherBusiness NewsMilitary NewsRoad ReportCannabis NewsCommentsADVERTISEStaffCompany StoreCONTACT USRSS Subscribe Search About Salem-News.com
Salem-News.com is an Independent Online Newsgroup in the United States, setting the standard for the future of News. Publisher: Bonnie King CONTACT: Newsroom@Salem-news.com Advertising: Adsales@Salem-news.com ~Truth~ ~Justice~ ~Peace~ TJP |
Aug-30-2007 17:17TweetFollow @OregonNews Op Ed: A Nation Long-Seduced,
Op Ed by Henry Clay Ruark
|
President Franklin D. Roosevelt in Washington DC in 1934. Photo courtesy: National archives |
(BEND, Ore.) - "The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it comes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is fascism - ownership of government by an individual, by a group."
-Franklin D. Roosevelt
Those famous words echo loudly today across this entire nation with consequential events demanding immediate drastic attention --by entirely appropriate democratic action-- from every thinking American still capable of understanding their momentous impact.
The first in this duo of Op Eds was called forth by pressing, near-desperate priorities now abundantly clear for our democracy and our remaining liberties. The portentous words and wisdom summarized below from a wide variety of published sources will clarify from whence these damnable consequences came, and by whose actions these calamities were made inevitable.
These events are all much more painful than need ever be our case --despite inescapable trends in our 21st Century world.
Let’s start with the now-established fact of a planned thirty-year crusade by the GOP to take over domination of the nation’s media in all possible channels, for partisan political purposes; with solid support from a group of Far Right billionaires using their deep resources to infiltrate, surround and overwhelm then-current “nonpartisan” foundations and think-tanks supporting non-partisan work.
These money-men immediately created multiple new “deeply “conservative” institutions in depth, abundantly providing cover and concealment for heavy money-flows furnishing paid-for “academic” support, “to provide acceptance by the free press and public”.
Never was this crusade intended to extend and strengthen our democracy as inherited in principle from the Founders. From its very start it built then-still politically respectable GOP into partisan-based supremacy over all other groups; for just so long as million/dollar/manipulation could provide; at any cost; using any weapons whatsoever --remorselessly applied.
That confrontational, combative controlling attitude is root-source of ostensible “political-principle differences” falsely cited ever since; defeating cooperative creation of solid governance actions at every political level from city halls to sate legislatures; and including Congress itself --at whatever dollar/costs.
In Oregon we’ve long observed decades of defeat, demolition of essential governance actions and frustration of conscientious elected officials, due to that “win at any cost” approach; including denial strongly-promised cooperation by those clearly controlled from D.C. for damaging partisan purposes.
Multiple private and many public open pronouncements make those points entirely visible, well-known to historic recorders. Findings are fully available in a whole series of studies, reports, books and other publications now --many consulted for this Op Ed.
Driving GOP-motivation was to seek, pursue and seize power, simple if NOT pure!, for objectives fully stated by a controlling Republican Party clique.
With “the arrival and conquest over all other Republicans of the neo-cons”, the most-damaging inevitable plunge to the bottom of the political barrel followed; denying and defying “professed democratic ideals and basic principles of the original Republicans.”
BUT with essentially the same goals of power over all, perverted by libertarian and other neo-con “principles”, including erroneous and extremely damaging “supply-side” economics perpetrated in the Reagan era.
“Neo-cons” have extremely different ideals and ideas in mind than did our Founders --as we saw all too clearly in “GOP leader dominance” denigrated into “clear, if not clean, neo-con ascendancy”-- with first distortion and then perversion at every level and in every way possible.
Perversion arrived and continues, driven relentlessly by “corporate campaign contributions”, made possible by “widely-recognized Supreme Court ‘precedent-failures on heavily-subsidized court cases’ involving the First and Fourteenth Amendments”.
Those notorious cases, “originating in Gilded Age context of railroad-development shenanigans and pay-offs now historically recognized”, bestowed “person-hood” on a “traditional corporate form recognized as only a legal fiction” for more than a century.
Major steps and stages in this damaging attack on American democracy began even before Reagan’s flawed “administration”. Rising power of corporate business interests culminated in “Gilded Age confrontations” clearly reflected in President Theodore Roosevelt’s historic controlling actions for “malefactors of great wealth”.
From Time magazine archives, here’s a telling description: “...the Northern Securities merger of 1901 created the greatest transport combine in the world, controlling commerce from Chicago to China."
T.R. busted it. In doing so he burnished himself with instant glory as the champion of American individual enterprise against corporate "malefactors of great wealth."
That reputation suited him just fine, although he privately believed in Big Business and was just as wary of unrestrained, amateurish competition.
"All he wanted to establish, early in his first term, was government's right to regulate rampant entrepreneurship,“ noted writer Edmund Morris, who won a Pulitzer for his biography of Teddy Roosevelt; he is also author of a biography of Ronald Reagan.
That trend gained speed and impact again with Reagan’s historic attack on unions and middle-class America by his smiling insistence on tax cuts for the rich and well-connected, while brutally repelling any union gains.
Meanwhile, he and a GOP-controlled Congress committed record national budget deficits by unrestrained spending and lavish monies for massive military forces.
David Stockman, Reagan’s Budge Director, confessed years later the process was intended to create an impossible funding situation for Congress; and also: To furnish easy proof for neo-con principles of much smaller government, forced by impossible-to-fund social trends and conditions. “It got out of hand,” Stockman states--as it most assuredly did!
We are still paying interest-costs on those huge deficits, invisible as ongoing charges on national borrowings in our national budgets till this day.
One does not achieve then-world/record budget deficits by simple error of omission or commission. It demands knowing actions, with close attention to the process itself, full of warning points and departures, with each direction chosen knowingly.
Even his VP-to be, Bush Senior, anointed the proceedings shaping the economy with the now-notorious nickname: “Voodoo economics”.
Which prompted a current economist to paraphrase that one as “deep voodoo”, referring to our current continuing consequential dilemma.
For clarity of statement, we return to our original reporter in Op Ed I, David Brock:
“The implications of this right-wing media incursion extend well beyond particular political outcomes to the heart of our democracy. Democracy depends on an informed citizenry. The conscious effort by the right wing to misinform the American citizenry --to collapse the distinction between journalism and propaganda-- is thus an assault on democracy itself.”
Any observer today will feel the same way. Reviewing deep-piled press reports, authoritative new studies, and many-more books now available; all examining the deep wounds inflicted on our Constitution by both of the Bush “administrations”; makes that essentially and inevitably unavoidable.
We leave the distressing details to your own examination.
The Bush and Reagan families were exceedingly well-connected with the elite class and cooperating corporate power-people, for which their many actions in public office were of great value in dollars and retention of status and power.
Current controversy over George W. Bush’s sole legislative “achievement” --No Child Left Behind-- provides intriguing information on long-continued historic-record circumstances: the theme of a forthcoming critical examination Op Ed report.
One final insightful comment remains to be recorded herein for your thoughtful repose. Here it is:
“Treason doth never prosper, what's the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason.”
---Sir John Harrington, 1561-1612
=============== Reader’s Note: This Op Ed summarizes for your review the essential contents of a whole series of new historically sensitive and extensive publications of record --books, magazine and daily newspaper investigative reports and other sources, many from Internet search-- on this most-essential shaping-sequence in our American history.
The entire list of references is on file with Editors of S-N, available on request, since too lengthy for publication here. See particularly: GANGS OF AMERICA: The Rise of Corporate Power and the Disabling of Democracy; Ted Nace; ISBN 1-57675-260-7. Quotations are verbatim, summarized or shortened; sources and complete statements available on request.
S-N Op Eds are professionally-prepared “opinion” built on these multiple public sources, then reported for your own open check with sources available to you. An Op Ed explaining the process in detail is available on request.
All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.
Henry Ruark September 1, 2007 6:30 am (Pacific time)
Anne and ALL: "See with own eyes" why we fight for honest reporting in Salem: Check out two Letters re teacher-pay in SJ Sat. 9/1. Readers know when they are getting manipulated, sooner these days than ever before, with far too many in any group well-informed, often ahead of "editors" at chain-papers with dollar-drive as motivation. "Tell it true, and readers will believe you" is still Golden Rule in real jrnlsm. Letters reflect the reality better than stories did...
Henry Ruark August 31, 2007 7:07 pm (Pacific time)
Anne et al: Best way to support S-N is to tell others about what we do and how we do it. Make sure to include any and all your merchant and small business friends. They already know what to expect from print-side, at what costs...and your word from website experience is the best advice they can ever get.
Tim King August 31, 2007 6:51 pm (Pacific time)
Anne: Your point is well taken. I am sorry that the site has gone the way it has, and there is a bright future for Salem here. Please appreciate that national stories are important to people here too, I'm sure that is not a hard sell. They can bring us large numbers of visitors when our national stories rank highly on Google.
There are other factors at play too; I lost both of my parents last month and Kevin Hays and I both have had to move in the last couple of weeks.
These events obviously have had an impact.
The goal in the first place, when I was still with KATU, was to give something to Salem and the surrounding areas that is greatly needed and we have not lost sight of that. Please help us by telling more people about Salem-News.com and even suggesting to businesses that they support us. We will try to meet the needs that both you and 'Salem news wanted' have brought forth. We really are listening, thanks.
Anne August 31, 2007 6:41 pm (Pacific time)
TK: "Oregon's capitol city needs to embrace Salem-News.com and support it." This will not happen if you don't stop to read again and find the point in what 'Salem news wanted' was saying -- more local news, less biased political commentary in your 'news' articles (see above on Tony Snow), please.
Henry Ruark August 31, 2007 11:30 am (Pacific time)
Must point out, too, SJ is monopoly on print-side. For how they handled that, see THE CHAIN GANG; Richard McCord; ISBN 0-8262-1375-8. Among first steps was 40% jump in ad-rates; civil suit re activities vs competitor was settled "on courthouse steps" rather than allow trial to take place. Advertisers have very clear choice, in own self-interest.
Henry Ruark August 31, 2007 11:07 am (Pacific time)
localnewswanted: Could not agree more. Tim, Bon doing damndest to fill need. But "opinion" is my bit. Yr complaint goes to heart of local responsibility long ago abandoned by "the other paper", ironically now seeking to put it back into place in others owned across nation. It is also worst feature of radio consolidation, with new joint newsroom operations now in place for geographically separated radio talk-stations, with abandonment of any real local news effort. Two large corporations control most of so-called "local"-radio, to the worst detriment of community needs. Corporate control is the villain in each case, with Wall St.demand for profits of more than 20 percent driving the demise of local coverage: costly operation at best and heart-of-service/given for use of commonweal-owned airwaves.
Tim King August 31, 2007 10:54 am (Pacific time)
To Salem News wanted: thanks for sharing your thoughts with us, I understand your frustration and if you have been coming here for a while you probably already know that the issues you mentioned are the reasons we started Salem-News.com over three years ago, to give people here a voice and a place to call their own.
The TV market structure that you mention which placed stations in Portland and Eugene back in the late 1940's is a hard one to get around, but Salem does have a TV station on UHF, that is Channel-17 (KWVT-Salem) and the Salem Monthly also is doing very well. I have been talking to the owner of that station about doing TV news for Salem for two years now. We would like to do it, but that is where much of this falls back to Salem. Oregon's capitol city needs to embrace Salem-News.com and support it. When it comes to the Portland area, we receive almost four times as many visitors each day than we do from Salem. We hope that as time continues, business owners here will advertise with us. That is the fuel that burns the fire. Also, please feel free to email us with more suggestions, we are listening and we want the site to be as functional as possible for residents here. We will take into consideration your request for a site map, thanks.
Tim King
Salem news wanted August 31, 2007 10:36 am (Pacific time)
Interesting piece, I guess, but I can find plenty of this type of analysis online. And I think it alienates readers with a different view of things. I come here, less frequently lately, for local, Salem, Oregon news. Tell me more about what's going on here in Salem. STORY IDEA: I can't believe that KFalls and Eugene have TV stations with local news and all, and Salem has zip. Why is that? Our local radio lacks... Our local papers, daily, and monthly, just absolutely lack any kind of breadth and depth at all. STORY IDEA: West Salem bridge has caught SJ's attention, how about a map showing the different ideas. How about an interview with Clem, he's from West Salem, and is a smart and articulate guy, what does he think. How about a discussion concerning the 5-6pm traffic across the bridge. Lines are getting longer, how long till gridlock? STORY IDEA: People in a small town like their "local paper" (thats YOU, salem-news.com) to carry articles bout local "personalities". Polititians, merchants, anyone who has achieved something, really. Roths, DeLon, Withnell, Epping, Tokarsky there are hundreds of local people who would love to be interviewed for the local paper.What are thier issues, passions, hobbies, peeves? What do theey think is right or wrong about Salem? These local ideas should have a headline on a side column, or in a table I guess you'd call it, so it doesn't get burried at the bottom of a long page after a day or two. Also, a "site map" would be helpful to browse thru them would be helpful. In summary: local, local, local...
Henry Ruark August 31, 2007 5:43 am (Pacific time)
I-V: NPR ever "heavily-funded" but always under dollar-needs, now slashed by Bush,with staff cuts, station maintenance NOT done, producing funds low, and corporate pressures quid pro quo for "contributions." Talk radio outpowers all else 1000-to-1 "conservative" a la 100s of hosts peddling same twaddle. Been involved with radio news since '34; two sons have 30 yrs experience each in the field; written extensively on this one, more to come... Here's simple fact of '05, from Wikipedia, with NPR going downhill ever since via Bush slashes: "Its flagship programs are two drive time news broadcasts, Morning Edition and the afternoon All Things Considered; both are carried by nearly all NPR affiliates and in 2002 were the second- and third-most popular radio programs in the country. In a Harris poll conducted in 2005, NPR was voted the most trusted news source in the US."
S.LaMarche; August 31, 2007 1:28 am (Pacific time)
another one to thank you for Henry. The one that goes, "all that evil needs to prevail is that good people do nothing", seems appropriete. My own personal opinion is; Impeach the bastards! We know whom I speak of.
Henry Ruark August 30, 2007 10:13 pm (Pacific time)
Odd you call NPR "liberal", since authoritative critics with media experience now angry with their seduction by "other side" --but old labels no longer apply as realistic observation will prove for most astute persons.
Leonardo August 30, 2007 10:02 pm (Pacific time)
You don't get any more independent than Salem-News, Independent Voter. That doesn't mean they don't have opinions.
Henry Ruark August 30, 2007 9:57 pm (Pacific time)
independent (as in "independent") adj. : free from external control and constraint; "an independent mind"; "a series of independent judgments"; "fiercely independent individualism". I believe we qualify on any reasonable measure.
independant voter August 30, 2007 8:46 pm (Pacific time)
yikes. what about NPR, an extremely liberal media outlet thats even heavily funded by the federal government. i liked salem-news better when it was more independant...
[Return to Top]©2025 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.