Tuesday January 7, 2025
SNc Channels:

Search
About Salem-News.com

 

Aug-24-2012 23:02printcomments

Ayn Rand, the Preacher of Selfishness Inspiring Paul Ryan

He looks to me slightly phony. I am not sure that Ayn Rand would have liked him either.

Ayn Rand and Paul Ryan
salon.com

(TEL AVIV Redress) - I was not interested in Paul Ryan, the man about to be nominated by the Republican party for the office of vice-president, until the name Ayn Rand popped up.

Ayn Rand, it was said, was one of the main inspirations for his particular philosophy. Since Ryan is being represented not as an ordinary, run-of-the-mill politician, like Mitt Romney, but as a profound political and economic thinker, the inspiration deserves some scrutiny.

Like most people in this country, Ayn Rand first entered my life as the author of The Fountainhead, a novel that came out four years before the birth of the state of Israel. It quickly became a bestseller. The movie based on it, with Gary Cooper playing the main role, was even more popular.

Glorifying selfishness

It is the story of an architect of genius (roughly similar to Frank Lloyd Wright) who follows his own individual style and disdains the tastes of the masses. When his architectural design for a housing project is altered by the builders, he blows the buildings up, defending his actions in court in a stirring speech in defence of individualism...

For Ayn Rand, “Any kind of social commitment was a sin against nature. Only by serving his own interest and cleansing himself of any trace of altruism can a person truly fulfill himself.”

I started to read her second bestseller, Atlas Shrugged, in which she set out her philosophy in detail. But I must confess, to my eternal shame, that I never finished it. It bored me.

One day in 1974, my friend Dan Ben-Amotz called me and demanded that I immediately meet a young genius he had discovered called Dr Moshe Kroy...

He brought Kroy to my home and I was impressed. Here was an unusually erudite 24-year-old youngster, already a lecturer at Tel Aviv University, with thick glasses and very outspoken philosophical views.

It appeared that he was a true believer in the teachings of Ayn Rand, which she called objectivism. This proclaimed that egoism was the basic duty of every human being. Any kind of social commitment was a sin against nature. Only by serving his own interest and cleansing himself of any trace of altruism can a person truly fulfill himself. Society at large can progress only when it is based on such individuals, each one striving to serve only himself (or herself).

Such an outlook can be hugely attractive to a certain kind of individual. It provides them with a philosophical justification for the extreme exercise of egoism, not giving a damn for anyone else.

Kroy, and of course Ben-Amotz, were religiously devoted to this new creed. (This is, of course, an oxymoron, since Ayn Rand was a total unbeliever, condemning any form of religion, including the Jewish religion of her parents.) When I caught Ben-Amotz doing something which could be construed as beneficial to others, he went to great lengths in justifying it by proving that in the long run it was to his own ultimate advantage.

Ayn Rand believed “the state was the enemy of the free individual. This led her ... to embrace an unbridled laissez faire capitalism ... and to reject any form of welfare state or safety net.”

Kroy himself was obviously a very disturbed being. At the age of 41 he committed suicide. I was not certain whether Ayn Rand disturbed his mind or whether he was attracted to her because he was disturbed to start with.

Ayn Rand was born as Alisa Zinovyevna Rosenbaum in Saint Petersburg, which later became Petrograd, which later became Leningrad. She was 12 years old when the Bolshevik revolution broke out in that city. The pharmacy of her parents was taken over by the regime, and the bourgeois family fled to the Crimea, which was held by White Russian forces. Later they returned to their native city, where Alisa studied philosophy and even published a book in Russian. In 1926 she reached the US, leaving her parents behind.

She adopted the name of Ayn (rhymes with “swine”, as she herself was wont to explain). She probably took the word from the Hebrew, where it means “eye”. The surname Rand may be a contraction of her original German-Jewish family name.

Her early history may in some measure explain her abiding hatred for Communism and any kind of collectivism, including social democracy, as well as any kind of religion or statism. For her, the state was the enemy of the free individual. This led her naturally to embrace an unbridled laissez faire capitalism ... and to reject any form of welfare state or safety net.

All this was well structured in her philosophy, which was adopted by believers all over the world. She once called herself “the most creative thinker alive”. On another occasion, she asserted that in all the annals of philosophy, there were only three great thinkers, all starting with an A: Aristotle, Aquinas and Ayn Rand.

Unabashed racist

She must have been an unabashed racist, too: during the 1973 Yom Kippur War she said that it was “civilized men fighting savages”, comparing Israelis to the white Americans fighting the Red Indians.

“There is something in the teachings of this Jewish White Russian preacher of extreme egoism that appeals to the primitive American myths of rugged individualism, gun-toting Wild West self-reliance...”

No wonder that she posthumously became the darling of the Tea Party fanatics who are now dominating the Republican Party. And no wonder that Paul Ryan proudly cites her as one of his most important mentors. (Ayn Rand herself died in 1982 at age 77. Her funeral was attended by her devotees, including Alan Greenspan, one of the gravediggers of the US economy.)

There is something in the teachings of this Jewish White Russian preacher of extreme egoism that appeals to the primitive American myths of rugged individualism, gun-toting Wild West self-reliance, suspicion of the domination-hungry state (going back to King George III). But this is not the 18th century, for God’s sake.

I never studied philosophy, though on my path I have picked up a few dozen books about it here and there. But Ayn Rand’s theories always struck me as, well, juvenile...

I have seen in my life innumerable acts of altruism, large and small. Indeed, what is love, real love, but a pure form of altruism?

Sure, every person is, to some extent, an egoist. But every person is also, to some extent, an altruist. Human beings are social animals, their social instincts deeply imbedded in their nature. Without them, human society could not function...

Casino billionaire Sheldon Adelson – financier of Netanyahu and Romney

Binyamin Netanyahu is an American-style Republican, a strong supporter of Mitt Romney... But not even he would advertise himself as a disciple of Ayn Rand. He has, however, one thing in common with Paul Ryan: both are pushed forward and financed by Sheldon Adelson.

I can think of no purer personification of Ayn Rand’s vision than this Casino billionaire. She would have adored him. He is the perfect egoist. He has become super-rich by exploiting the pitiful addiction of weak human beings. His business practices have been questioned. Yet even here there is some room for doubt: does Adelson spend hundreds of millions on people like Romney, Ryan and Netanyahu only to further his own business interests? Or do we detect even here a trace of altruism, a desire to fulfill his national and social visions, objectionable as they may be?

Since Ayn Rand was an atheist and abhorred anything that was not purely rational, while the Tea Party is strictly religious (never mind what religion), Ryan is now compelled to distance himself from his mentor, who was also a militant advocate of abortion.

Actually, I don’t believe in either the intellectual prowess or the political honesty of the man. He looks to me slightly phony. I am not sure that Ayn Rand would have liked him either. If only Gary Cooper could play him, he might look more convincing.

First published by Redress News & Analysis

Uri Avnery is an Israeli author and activist. www.avnery-news.co.il

___________________________________
Uri Avnery (Hebrew: אורי אבנרי‎, also transliterated Uri Avneri, born 10 September 1923) is an Israeli writer and founder of the Gush Shalom peace movement.

A member of the Irgun as a teenager, Avnery sat in the Knesset from 1965–74 and 1979–81.[1] He was also the owner of HaOlam HaZeh, an Israeli news magazine, from 1950 until it closed in 1993.

He is famous for crossing the lines during the Battle of Beirut to meet Yassir Arafat on 3 July 1982, the first time the Palestinian leader ever met with an Israeli. Avnery is the author of several books about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, including 1948: A Soldier’s Tale, the Bloody Road to Jerusalem (2008); Israel’s Vicious Circle (2008); and My Friend, the Enemy (1986). In 2005, he was voted the 128th-greatest Israeli of all time, in a poll by the Israeli news website Ynet to determine whom the general public considered the 200 Greatest Israelis. Avnery is a contributor to the news and opinion sites CounterPunch, Information Clearing House, Scoop.co.nz LewRockwell.com and The Exception Magazine.


-------------------------------

_______________________________


<




Comments Leave a comment on this story.
Name:

All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.



LWJR August 29, 2012 10:10 am (Pacific time)

ayn rand watched the bolsheviks confiscate her fathers business during the revolution. she didn't want to see socialism take over the USA when she immigrated and saw FDR and the NY Elite heading that way. Some of you should actually read and get a balanced point of view.


Anonymous August 26, 2012 1:04 pm (Pacific time)

The Rand perspective, like any opinion, is just an opinion, except some opinions have better support based on common sense observations, that is, if you are capable of engaging in objective critical thinking.When people perceive their society is being infiltrated and taken over by Collectivism, how should they respond? What is their ultimate fuel in the battle for liberty? What do they resurrect as the ideal that is being scorched by Collectivism? Yes the Constitution, yes the Bill of Rights, yes the Republic. But what were those documents and that form of government there for in the first place? What WAS the great ideal that lay behind them? And if very few people can recall the ideal or understand it, what then? The ideal was and is THE INDIVIDUAL. But not just the individual. The FREE INDIVIDUAL.

But not just the free individual. The FREE AND POWERFUL INDIVIDUAL. Which is what Ayn Rand was writing about... This was an author who lifted the subject of individual power beyond anything seen since Nietzsche. To grasp her Promethean effort and accomplishment, you have to read her books at least several times, because your own reactions and responses will change. She was attempting to dig a whole civilization out from its smug certainty about the limits of freedom, from its compulsion to borrow and steal worn-out ideas. The matrix of modern life has no solution without a frontal exposure of the meaning and reality and sensation and emotion and mind and imagination of INDIVIDUAL POWER. Ayn Rand, in her unique way, climbed the mountain of power and told about the vista that was then in her sights. She exercised no caution. She knew the consequences would be extraordinary. The characters she creates who embody power are electric. You experience them beyond mere fiddle-faddle with symbols. Rand wrote two novels that still reverberate in the minds of millions of people: The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged.

The books have inspired unalloyed adoration and hatred. They are received as a magnificent tonic or a dose of poison. Readers who hate Rand’s work hate her for daring to present the power of an individual in full force. Rand’s major heroes, Howard Roark and John Galt, are artists. Creators. They bow before no one and nothing. They invent. They decide. They imagine. They refuse to compromise. They leave the team and the group and the committee and the bureaucracy and the collective behind them in the dust. They contradict every element of collectivism. They see it for what it really is: the attempt to kill off the individual. Before any government has ever existed, it was the power of the individual who financed it's existence. Where is America now heading? What has history shown what happens when government gets so big, that the individual no longer has the freedom to exercise their pursuit of life, liberty and happiness? My late father used to say “the left uses great truths, to implement great lies”.

DJ: I don't think you've gone far enough in your analysis. The ideal was not just the individual, but the free individual; not just the free individual, but the free and powerful individual; and not just the free and powerful individual, but the free and powerful individual who owned slaves. That's the basis of your wonderful founding documents. 


Anonymous August 26, 2012 9:24 am (Pacific time)

In my opinion re: "Pity the Billionaire" by Thomas Frank--It’s simply wrong to claim, as Frank does, that “the main political response to [the financial crisis of 2008] is a campaign to roll back regulation, to strip government employees of the right to collectively bargain, and to clamp down on federal spending.”

Certainly the tea party, a handful of people in Congress (most of them with the last name Paul) and some policy wonks would welcome such moves. But far from being power brokers, such folks are little more than utopian dreamers, as likely to be attacked by their allies as by their enemies. The toughest fight that tea party favorite Rand Paul had in becoming the junior senator from Kentucky in 2010 came from House Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who did everything he could to keep him from gaining office.

Lest we forget, the major response to the financial crisis in 2008 was the bailing out of Wall Street and the auto companies under a conservative Republican president and the implementation of an $800 billion stimulus plan promoted by a Democratic president.That’s not to mention a health-care reform package that was routinely described as “historic” and “transformational” at its passage. Ironically, such immediate, massive and — in the case of the stimulus — ineffective actions are in keeping with those of Herbert Hoover. After all, the stimulus failed to achieve any of the targets set by its proponents. Progressives like Frank, have always been short-sighted, and I believe this is because they have limited, if any, successful experience in the private sector. Plus, they seem to most likely not to have taken any History courses , at least from professors who required an understanding of the past..

 

See this: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/25/bill-maher-new-rules-for-paul-ryan-todd-akin_n_1830060.html  


Daniel Johnson August 25, 2012 5:13 pm (Pacific time)

As Jeff Walker wrote in The Ayn Rand Cult: "the freedom not to give a damn about the weak remains a heady concept for many readers."


Anonymous August 25, 2012 2:36 pm (Pacific time)

Editor: please forgive me for posting this as a non-related subject to this article, but I felt the need to share this and the article you posted a few days ago, I cant find now. But this is what the ex-marine who was kidnapped thru NDAA, wrote on facebook. I agree with every word he wrote and consider him a true marine..sorry for posting this in a non-related article, but I simply felt I had to...thanks, I wont make a habit of it...He is a TRUE marine.... http://www.infowars.com/the-truth-facebook-post-by-brandon-raub/


Anonymous August 25, 2012 10:54 am (Pacific time)

The left’s Orwellian usage of language is so scientifically deceptive, that most of us have friends or family members, who although otherwise reasonable,

have been so profoundly nudged from the truth, that no amount of evidence in the world will ever dislodge them from their false realities.

As masters of deception, evil knows how to lure many well intentioned individuals by professing to seek a more humane world, where many of our

Judeo/Christian values will be realized.

"All warfare is based primarily on the deception of an enemy. Fighting on a battlefield is the most primitive way of making war. There is no art higher than

to destroy your enemy without a fight—by SUBVERTING anything of value in the enemy’s country."
Sun Tzu
Chinese philosopher
500 B.C. The left’s most important tenet, the one upon which their entire philosophy revolves, is aimed at destroying the
disparity of wealth within a society. Therefore when they talk about equality, they are not talking about the
principles upon which our great nation was founded, such as equal rights and opportunities for everyone alike, it is
not enough that we may be created equal, to them we must also have equality of results, regardless of effort,
contribution or ability.”
The left uses this psycho babble to steal everything that
that they can.

They have no interest in equality, liberty, freedom, justice, fairness, growth, compassion and compromise.

Their real desire is to become the ruler of other men.

 DJ: I  suggest you read Pity the Billionaire by Thomas Frank (It's a short book) , then write back. If you really believe what you wrote in this comment, I doubt that you'll be able to finish it; even more doubtful that you'll ever even be able to pick it up. Let us know.


Anonymous August 25, 2012 8:49 am (Pacific time)

So Uri, what is your position on the war criminal attack on the USS Liberty? I see you have not asked for a criminal investigation and trial for those war Zionists criminals, many who live in the states. How about all that money we capitalists in the states send the war criminal nation of Israel? Have you asked for an investigation of those Jewish members of our U.S. congress who aid and abet your criminal nation with funding to support your ongoing criminal treatment, even genocide, of Palestinians? So you offer what you think is info relevant for the American voter, I say what is relevant for the American voter is to be aware of the Zionists out there who will kill us all unless we deal with them, now! My exposure to many Zionists is how they so often use transparent methods of distraction, to keep the world from seeing who they really are, and their peerless violent nature. The historical record of not just Israel, but the entire violent war-mongering Zionists, pre-dating your world slavery criminaity, by thousands of years. We know who the real enemy to not just America, but the whole planet, is...

Editor: Do you realize who Uri is?  This is one of Israel's strongest voices for peace.  This is not the enemy and all people expressing such criticism should use their name.  Uri does. 

[Return to Top]
©2025 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.


Articles for August 23, 2012 | Articles for August 24, 2012 | Articles for August 25, 2012
The NAACP of the Willamette Valley

googlec507860f6901db00.html
Support
Salem-News.com:

Annual Hemp Festival & Event Calendar


Special Section: Truth telling news about marijuana related issues and events.