Friday May 26, 2017
Nov-17-2012 17:57TweetFollow @OregonNews
Californians Have No Right to Know Anything CrucialAndrew Baker Special to Salem-News.com
This article is useful in beginning to understand who is behind the GMOs in food and vaccines, and what are they doing.
(SACRAMENTO, CA) - The California Right to Know campaign focused on passing Prop 37, an initiative to get genetically engineered food labeled so people would be able to know what is going in their own and their children’s bodies. The corporations involved in producing and selling GMOs poured millions into stopping the initiative, putting out stunning lies to do so.
But Californians haven’t noticed another area involving their children and the corporations in collusion with the state of California, in which they are not even allowed to know that something has entered their child’s body. The information is kept secret from them.
Sibel Edmonds, a respected whistle blower, has written a devastatingly direct piece on what has occurred in California around this other, even more serious, “right to know” and its even greater removal of the right to know. For at least with food, people can investigate or figure out whether there are GMOs, but in this second area, the information is kept secret from the parents.
“I just came across the following information on elimination of parental consent and knowledge as a prerequisite to vaccinating children in California. I checked the date and went, ‘why in the world didn’t I hear about this?’ The information is several months old, but I decided to post it as a quick note for those who happened to miss this development on the police state front, thinking, if as an avid reader and news researcher I missed this, probably many others must have too. Here are a few excerpts on this issue:
“The article goes on to list the major role played by the pharma industry and their octopus-like lobby:
“Pharmaceutical and medical lobbyists were heavily involved in pushing AB499 through the state legislature. After all, by stripping parents of their right to make informed decisions about medical procedures that could harm their children, they have tapped a new market for their Gardasil vaccine. ….
Edmonds doesn’t waste time on “vaccine issues” but goes straight for the political heart of things.
“My daughter is now 3, and I have less than two years to get her out of here, to a place where I won’t be forced to relinquish my parental rights and responsibilities to the State. My child ain’t gonna be no police state’s youth, and she ain’t gonna be raised in any state’s bosom; cosmetic differences and brand-names don’t make a difference: whether Hitler’s youth or Mussolini’s youth, whether under the fatherland or motherland brand, whether from the US Department of Homeland Security or Department of Education, whether in the name of national security or national health… “
And she includes a photo of what such extreme state control over children signifies to her. Here.
But whether it is those opposing vaccines because they consider them dangerous, or Ms. Edmonds opposing the state’s taking away parents’ right even to know whether vaccines have been given to their child, neither has noticed what may be the most important information possible around vaccines – all the new vaccines are GMO vaccines. While they are called “DNA vaccines,” the vaccines shoot patented GMOs into the child, and the hope is for “DNA uptake.”
So parents in California (1) aren’t allowed to know what they are feeding their children, and (2) they are not allowed to know if their 12 year old or older children have been vaccinated at all. And though most California parents are upset having no right to know about GMOs in their food, they don’t realize that all the vaccines being shot into their children are also GMOs. And the Gardasil vaccine, the main one being given secretly, may contain a new chemical of untested toxicity , and does contain viral HPV DNA fragments.
And while the California Right to Know Campaign focused on food companies and biotech companies like Monsanto, the reality is that it is pharmaceutical industry that produces GMOs. They are the source for both GMOs contamination of food and for all the new vaccines, which are designed to permanently alter human DNA with patented GMOs. And they pay the lobbyists who have pushed through laws removing parental rights to even know their children are being injected with vaccines at all, and they are certainly not telling parents, their children, from birth on, are being injected with patented GMOs of many kinds, meant to be taken up by the children’s DNA.
This article is useful in beginning to understand who is behind the GMOs in food and vaccines, and what are they doing.
“At the end of WWII the allies split up IG Farben into companies that are now the top pharmaceutical concerns on earth among them Bayer, Hoescht, BASF, the Agfa-Gevaert Group and Cassella AG. Many of Wall Streets favorite pharmaceutical/chemical companies behind the proliferation of genetically-altered foods, transgenic animals, human cloning, dangerous psychiatric drugs, deadly vaccines and pesticides-such as Aventis-are subsidiaries of these same companies. ….
“Why is it significant that many of Bush’s staff and cabinet appointees are former pharmaceutical company executives as was GW’s father, former President George Bush? These corporations are voraciously patenting the earth’s life forms-its plants, bacteria, viruses, animals and even human genetic lineages. Reproduction of plants, animals and humans may eventually be totally controlled by these corporations, genetically-altered, recombined into chimeric life forms and exploited for profit.
“The Human Genome Project, as it admits on the very first page of its website – http://vector.cshl.org/
Californians are not allowed to know what they are feeding their children or if vaccines are being given to their preteen and teen children. But while Californians on their own have learned what it means to genetically engineer seeds and the terrible impact of eating crops grown from them, they have not looked into these new vaccines and do not realize that a method similar to that used to alter seeds is being employed when GMO vaccines are injected into a child. Gene guns are used for the seeds, and are sometimes used to give the vaccines as well.
From Wikipedia on methods of delivery of DNA Vaccines:
“The two most popular approaches are injection of DNA in saline, using a standard hypodermic needle, and gene gun delivery. … Injection in saline is normally conducted intramuscularly (IM) in skeletal muscle, or intradermally (ID), with DNA being delivered to the extracellular spaces. This can be assisted by electroporation; by temporarily damaging muscle fibers with myotoxins such as bupivacaine; or by using hypertonic solutions of saline or sucrose. Immune responses to this method of delivery can be affected by many factors, including needle type, needle alignment, speed of injection, volume of injection, muscle type, and age, sex and physiological condition of the animal being injected.
“Gene gun delivery, the other commonly used method of delivery, ballistically accelerates plasmid DNA (pDNA) that has been adsorbed onto gold or tungsten microparticles into the target cells, using compressed helium as an accelerant.
“Alternative delivery methods have included aerosol instillation of naked DNA on mucosal surfaces, such as the nasal and lung mucosa, and topical administration of pDNA to the eye and vaginal mucosa. Mucosal surface delivery has also been achieved using cationic liposome-DNA preparations, biodegradable microspheres, attenuated Shigella or Listeria vectors for oral administration to the intestinal mucosa, and recombinant [genetically engineered] adenovirus vectors.”
Jeffrey Smith at the Institute for Responsible Technology has warned repeatedly that the method of genetic engineering, including the gene gun is very crude. He is more than right. The article, Murdoch and Vaccines, reports that while the “DNA vaccines” depend on DNA uptake, ….”[t]his phenomenon has not been the subject of much research, so the actual mechanism of DNA uptake is not known.” (The article, relating to the MMR vaccine and Glaxo Smith Kline, includes information on the bankers’ involvement in the vaccines, the same bankers who were involved in stealing from the country. The article, however, predates the fact that GSK was recently found guilty in the largest health fraud settlement in US history.)
It does not take much logical thought to appreciate what this means and there is no nice way to put it: American children’s DNA is being genetically altered.
This is true though parents have no idea the vaccines mandated to their children are different from previous vaccines and that they include patented material that will permanently alter their child’s DNA (and without those who created these vaccines knowing how that works), and affect that child’s basic code of life as well as all their future offspring. Thanks to the vaccines, for the first time in human history, the child’s organic genetic line from its mother and its father, now has the addition of synthetic genetic material from pharmaceutical industry, the specifics of which are unknown and untested but are patented. In addition, all liability has been removed from these companies as to any physiological or medical harm that might befall the children after corporate tampering with the fundamentals of their life code. The pharmaceutical industry is contaminating children’s previously “organic” DNA by injection, just as Monsanto has contaminated organic fields by pollination.
Monsanto makes claims on the fields it contaminates. Should parents expect intellectual property claims over their children’s blood, organs, bones, stem cells, etc? As patented GMO material is forced into children’s DNA and as it increases with each vaccine, what rights might corporations claim in relation to the children?
What is certain is that children are being experimented on and that laws are being broken. More, no parent has been asked to sign a release either for this vaccine experiment on their child or for the release of their children’s intellectual property rights over their own unique DNA. In addition, given that it is now clear via UK FOIAs that the vaccines themselves are a hoax, the foisting of any vaccines on children should be pulled out of any medical frame of reference entirely and the use of disease scares to promote vaccines (that do not prevent diseases) to legislatures, to doctors, or to parents, might be considered a deceptive trade practice. (See the CDC’s outrageous behavior around an H1N1 false “pandemic”, its refusal to respond to FOIA requests from CBS, its urging of the vaccine on pregnant women, leading to a 2440% increase in fetal demise in 2009). Deceptive trade practices or any lawsuit based outside of medical harm, might get around the pharmaceutical industry’s removal of its own liability, which, incidentally occurred within two weeks of Monsanto removal of all its own liability, shifting it onto farmers.
There is another area of commonality between GMOs in food and GMO vaccines. Both of them are related to infertility. And it is quite clear that the richest of the rich, and including those involved in GMOs and vaccines, are interested in a dramatic reduction in world population.
Californians have a right to know anything they desire about what may affect their own or their children’s health. But the pharmaceutical industry is the industry that put Hitler into power in the 1930s, and is 20 times bigger now. It has done a stunning job of trampling the Nuremberg Code – informed consent – which was put in place specifically to prevent a repeat of its Holocaust horrors. The state pandemic laws set up for a repetition. They were put in place under George Bush, whose family made their fortune in Nazi Germany and whose father, GHW Bush, is closely connected to pharmaceutical industry.
“2002: soon after George W. Bush signed the Homeland Security Act, New York Times columnist Bob Herbert discovered that: “Buried in this massive bill, snuck into it in the dark of night by persons unknown . . . was a provision that – incredibly – will protect Eli Lilly and a few other big pharmaceutical outfits from lawsuits by parents who believe their children were harmed by thimerosal. ….[More violations follow.]“When Eliot Spitzer was campaigning for New York Attorney General (1998) he declared: “when a corporation is convicted of repeated felonies that harm or endanger the lives of human beings or destroy our environment, the corporation should be put to death, its corporate existence ended, and its assets taken and sold at public auction.”
The pandemic laws arrange for martial law in the US under cover of public health (the ACLU says the laws lack public health provisions, and are solely about law enforcement and security). They allow for the removal of anyone resisting vaccines (unknown and untested) to “quarantine” or imprisonment, if a pandemic emergency is declared. People would be subject to forced diagnostic testing, forced taking of samples (not excluding organs), mandated unknown and untested drugs, unknown and untested chemicals, and be subject to forced and unknown, untested “medical treatment.” In short, the pandemic laws, arrange for mass forced human medical experiments. The CDC, already complicit in inventing the H1N1 “pandemic” (a financial scam by the pharmaceutical industry which rivaled the bailout) would declare such an emergency which does not require proof of evidence of any disease, but does allow for the seizure of property and land if anything is declared contaminated. No liability for any errors.
Californians have the right to know about those pandemic laws, too, as they were written by the same pharmaceutical industry that is, even now, lying to them about vaccines in general, preventing them from knowing what is in their food and thus from protecting their own children from the threat of GMOs, and surreptitiously altering their children’s DNA via patented synthetic GMOs in vaccines.
In all this, there is a medical myth – lie – that Californians might want to be aware of, since it is the basis for intense fear of pandemic influenza (and thus the pandemic laws) and for belief in the medical system itself. That first order myth is that a pandemic flu was a massive killer in 1918. In reality, flu did not kill. Aspirin, a strong immune suppressant (as are vaccines), is now considered the likely cause of so many deaths. For a brief overview of a leading pharmaceutical industry company and the millions of deaths (and billions of deaths of bees) it has contributed to, one might read these linked articles.
Part 1:. 1918 and Aspirin http://foodfreedom.wordpress.
[Addendum: Monsanto was involved in the 1918 deaths. 1917: Bayer, The German competition cut prices in an effort to drive Monsanto out of business, but failed. Soon, Monsanto diversified into phenol (a World War I-era antiseptic), and aspirin when Bayer's German patent expired in 1917. Monsanto began making aspirin, and soon became the largest manufacturer world-wide.]
Part 2:. Aspirin Killed, Homeopathy Saved http://foodfreedom.wordpress.
Part 3:. Vaccines and CDC’s Myth of a 1918 Virus http://foodfreedom.wordpress.
Part 4:. Aspirin Deaths Continue Beyond 1918 http://foodfreedom.wordpress.
Part 5:. A New Set of Questions about 1918 and Bush’s Pandemic laws http://foodfreedom.wordpress.
Part 7: Bayer Inherits Nazi funds http://www.rawfoodinfo.com/
Part 8: Bayer and Bees http://www.forbes.com/sites/
Part 9: Bayer and Monsanto http://bestmeal.info/monsanto/
Part 10: Bayer and Terrorism http://www.rawfoodinfo.com/
Part 11: Bayer and Organic Supplements http://articles.mercola.com/
For those California parents who still, despite the UK FOIAs and the CDC not responding for years to FOIA requests about vaccines it claims are safe and effective or to court orders to turn them over, do not realize they have been massively deceived, they might want to look through some of the following links, starting with the first two videos of Garth Nicolson, a California resident and one of the leading cell biologists in the world.
As for vaccines, California parents might want to be aware that all of the infectious diseases for which vaccines are given has been cured by high dose vitamin C but the FDA is working with pharma, not only to destroy organic farming and food, but to make organic supplements unavailable to the public (as Nicolson mentions in his interview).
“Many viral infectious diseases have been cured and can continue to be cured by the proper administration of Vitamin C. Yes, the vaccinations for these treatable infectious diseases are completely unnecessary when one has the access to proper treatment with vitamin C. And, yes, all the side effects of vaccinations…are also completely unnecessary since the vaccinations do not have to be given in the first place with the availability of properly dosed vitamin C.”—Dr Thomas Levy M.D., J.D. (Vitamin C, Infectious Diseases and Toxins p30)
Vaccination: The Shot that Keeps on Shooting Thomas Levy
Californians have a right to good news as well. They might appreciate that there are invaluable options for protecting their families’ health, as well as learning why those options work and who is suppressing them.
Yes, Californians have a right to know about their food. They also have a right to know what is being done to their children. And they absolutely have a right to bombard their state legislature with demands that state legislators nullify the pandemic martial laws that threaten everyone’s lives.
California parents also have a right to file suit against the vaccine manufacturers for contaminating their children and all their future descendants’ DNA with patented corporate intellectual property in the form of synthetic GMOs, without having obtained any parental releases for what is a commercial taking. And they have a right to file suit for deceptive trade practices involved in the corporations promoting vaccines while the CDC and the US government were refusing to respond to FOIA requests which will show, just as the UK FOIAs did (because they are about the same vaccines), that the government has known for years that the vaccines don’t work, cause the diseases they are supposed to prevent (and other diseases), and that the government has colluded with industry in preventing safety studies and in arranging to lie to the public in order to continue the charde of the vaccine schedule. It is possible the government’s mandated vaccine schedule is worse even than that.
Legal discovery during any lawsuits might uncover quite a lot of things for Californians demand their right to know.
Articles for November 16, 2012 | Articles for November 17, 2012 | Articles for November 18, 2012