Friday January 10, 2025
SNc Channels:

Search
About Salem-News.com

 

Nov-01-2006 20:49printcomments

The Blurred Line of Our Social Services

Are our caseworkers guardians of state/federal regulations or a helping hand for those in need?

Construction worker art
The client worked in the construction trades before a back injury seriously restricted his work ability

(SALEM) - Are our caseworkers guardians of state/federal regulations or a helping hand for those in need?

I recently had the experience of becoming an advocate for an individual who found himself, once again, in the need of social services. His job had ended because a prior back injury prevented him from fulfilling the work expectations of his employer. He needed food stamps and ran into a brick wall - a very determined caseworker bent on following the rules.

Homeless man in Salem
Photo by: Tim King

I can understand and emphasize with both sides of this social fence. The employees in our social service system are faced with trying to be empathetic towards their client consumer but are also faced with enforcing the many layers of rules and regulations put forth by the state and federal government. Who they are to serve becomes a blur.

Somehow our social system, which was set up to help citizens in need, has become a multi-level murky mirage of rules and regulations. I know there are those who abuse the system but believe me; the system is set up in such a way it creates an atmosphere for abuse to happen. Sometimes people feel like they have to cheat just to make it.

Here is a case in point, which is just one small example. The individual that I was helping was upset over the fact that his family had no food. The one box of food from the food banks allowed once a month, while very much appreciated, just doesn’t cut it. He had to go back to applying for food stamp assistance.

He called the Adult and Family Services office to confirm his appointment and was told to come in at 11:00 AM on a particular morning for the orientation class. He did that, and then was told that he was at the wrong appointment, he was supposed to have been at the 8:00 AM class. He rescheduled and went to the next available morning appointment.

Usually it takes up to five days for the approval to go through, so when the five days came and went he began calling the Adult and Family Service office. The caseworker told him she would take care of it when she came to it. Then, the next two working days she had off.

Now, I know that caseworkers earn and deserve days off, but it seems the system could allow for a contingency backup. There should be someone who can cover the casework load when an assigned worker is on vacation or sick leave. But true to our government system, there are not enough workers to go around, not only with Adult and Family Services but any of the social service areas that serve those in need of help, especially in a sudden crisis situation.

This client/consumer persisted in calling and always got the same response. I went to the Adult and Family Services office with him and we asked to speak with a supervisor. We were advised that going to the lead worker would be the first step. The lead worker was called and she sent out the caseworker.

The caseworker said, “I told you I would get to your case as soon as I can get to it.” He said, “It has been well over five days. It has never taken this long before.” She replied, “Well, since you missed your first appointment, you have been taken off the expedient list and I will get to it as soon as I can.” I then responded by saying, “Do you mean to say his family is being penalized because they were given wrong information from this office?” The response, “No, he has just been taken off the expedient list because he missed his appointed.” Again, I countered with, “Then he is getting penalized because a mistake was made from this office by giving him the wrong time to come in?” The response, “No, he was just taken off the expedient list because of missing his first appointment. I’ll get to it when I can.”

By this time, the client consumer was getting very upset. I took his arm and said, “Let’s go, maybe you can hold a sign on a street corner.” By that time my negotiating skills had gone out the window. As we left, though, I did see a flicker of emotion pass across the caseworker’s face. The next morning the food stamps were approved and available. I am not saying this was because of our interaction; maybe his name had finally reached the top of her list!

A homeless Salem-area family Photo by: Tim King

Caseworkers are human beings with feelings, but when they are faced with having to meet the requirements of their job, making sure the T’s are crossed and the I’s are dotted so as to comply with their next state or federal audit, which would you choose? Obviously the one who signs your paycheck will win out.

This is the murky line where I believe the system allows families to fall through the cracks. There are many families needing help and the caseworkers are totally overloaded.

The main issue I see here is that our society has to come to grips with what is important.

* Is it the welfare of families, the homeless, the mentally ill, the developmentally disadvantaged, or anyone who suddenly faces a life-changing event?

* Are we training our state workers in the social service fields to help individuals work through the mirage of rules and assist them in getting the help needed in a timely manner?

* Are the workers being trained to be watchdogs of the rules and regulations and to forget the human element?

What’s important here? Oh, the murky waters!

We need to make sure the money allocated to our government is being spent where it needs to be. That will take the load off our state social service workers. More jobs need to be provided within our system to help with high caseloads. With the current climate of our society, believe me there will be many families in crisis. If all the money allocated for lobbyists and special interest groups and big corporations are prepared to fill deep pockets with their available moneys, then really, our priorities need to be analyzed.

Remember, each and every one of us is just an unexpected crisis away from getting caught in the murky water of our much over stretched social service programs and the overloaded caseworkers.




Comments Leave a comment on this story.
Name:

All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.



Henry Ruark November 9, 2006 9:22 am (Pacific time)

To all: Used-to-be in journalism the working rule was "comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable" -- now reversed for stock-ratio reasons and in direct defiance of Founder intent in 1st Amendment. SO wiser citizens now doing for selves via Internet and all other open channels. Works every time if enough join in the effort, for long enough...as Tuesday vote surely proves.


Lela November 7, 2006 7:33 pm (Pacific time)

Hello Albert and Henry, thanks for your comments. I know this is such a black eye for our government. Seems somewhere along the line the simple truth that "We the people of these United States are the government and the government belongs to us, the people" has been forgotten. Somehow the very wealthy, the large corporations, and the large banks have become the ruling power. Our tax dollars should be going to making sure our citizens are healthy, educated, sheltered, and given equal opportunity for life. The less fortunate should not have to struggle and fight just to get a helping hand. Yes, it is great for those that work hard and become successful but not at the expense of sitting back and letting others not so fortunate go on the wayside. The injured should not have to beg to get medical care or life substance for their families. For those that want higher education, it should be equal to them. Those that just want to learn a skill or trade as their life choice, they should be provided the equal opportunity to get this. Our friends or families should not have to be suffering in this country. When my son was injured on a construction job, he was denied by the state accident insurance fund because one of the bosses said it was not an on-the-job injury, the other boss said it was, his doctor said it was, he said it was, but based on one person they refused his financial assistance and his income was totally cut off. He finally got a little state assistance, but hardly enought to exist. He finally had to settle at a less amount than he deserved even though he is still injured and his back will never be the same. His attorney was no help at all. But, when you don't have the money to fight the big guys one might as well tie the rope one the cement block and jump before they push! Okay, we all have stories, what can we citizens do? The question is out there for everyone!


Henry Ruark November 6, 2006 5:05 am (Pacific time)

Lela, Al, all: Latest total cost for Iraq invasion is set at over TWO TRILLION DOLLARS...by Nobel-winning economist Stiglitz. (PDF on request.) NO excuse in this nation for allowing such departure from democratic principle. We MUST move to universal health care, election reform, and corporate control via CSR characteristics now world trend.


Albert Marnell November 5, 2006 1:16 pm (Pacific time)

Lela, I have seen a friend and his family go through these layers of red-tape just to eat right. Bad things happen to people even when they are careful and do the right thing. My friend worked his whole life and then was assaulted on the job. He is a carpenter. The assault has disabled him. Now he is being treated like dirt. The social benefits available are stressful to everyone and insufficient by a long shot. Churches are well intended but too often when it comes to food they have stale boxed cakes and canned foods. In this country churches should not have to be used as a front line against hunger or starvation and in most cases can only give rationed unhealthy or junk food that will cause medical problems later. Meanwhile, there are Americans that drop hundreds a night in high-end restaurants. All of this, including the lack of national health insurance is a disgrace. You could have paid a billion dollars in taxes over your lifetime and if you become disabled you are treated like you are some kind of a bum. There are also many places in the country that do not have living wage jobs and it does not even pay for some people to get out of bed even if they are not disabled.


Henry Ruark November 2, 2006 6:55 pm (Pacific time)

AJ: Yours not entirely clear, but believe it emphasizes my point that most of social service dissatisfaction comes from drastically underfunded programs, with workers caught in near-impossible demands for clients served and time spent on detailed accounting. That's NOT as it should be and can be, given competent management and rational funding. To under-fund is simply to multiply impacts and distresses, costing more in long run...as Depression days should have taught us, with its lack of civilized succor for those unfortunates caught beyond any possible effort on their own.


aj November 2, 2006 9:35 am (Pacific time)

No you know social services disgust me at this point. They have been and will continue to pick and choose which rules and regs to enforce. Im a member of Oregon. I know many times I couldnt get unemployment because of employers lying about what and who they paid what. I know many times I didnt qualify for DHS help because I was not the right race. I know of many services that a privately run who just cant keep up with those who need the help.


Henry Ruark November 1, 2006 10:24 pm (Pacific time)

To all: What Lela lays out here in excruciating detail is exactly what many persons encounter --and have ever since real Depression days in the '30s-- whenever a ruling regime rammed through slashes in staff and dollars. Any competent reporter on any reasonably-sized daily detailed to this beat will tell you the same. "Efficiencies" never cut it; only commonsense management for open-hearted help paid for by all of us can ever do the job...$10-minimum corporate tax will never make it when we need it --and you may be next.

[Return to Top]
©2025 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.


Articles for October 31, 2006 | Articles for November 1, 2006 | Articles for November 2, 2006
Sean Flynn was a photojournalist in Vietnam, taken captive in 1970 in Cambodia and never seen again.

Tribute to Palestine and to the incredible courage, determination and struggle of the Palestinian People. ~Dom Martin


Special Section: Truth telling news about marijuana related issues and events.

Support
Salem-News.com:

The NAACP of the Willamette Valley