Wednesday January 1, 2025
SNc Channels:

Search
About Salem-News.com

 

May-24-2011 17:23printcomments

Oregon Legislators Protest Nuclear Storage at Hanford

"Because of this operation, Hanford is today the most contaminated nuclear site in the United States." - Portland legislators

Nuclear 'reaction' by Salem-News.com
Nuclear 'reaction' by Salem-News.com

(PORTLAND, Ore.) - 17 Portland-area legislators have contacted officials with the U.S. Department of Energy to share their concerns over nuclear waste storage.

Their letter, shown below,urges the US Dept. of Energy not to consider bringing Greater Than Class C nuclear waste to the Hanford Nuclear Reservation as a permanent storage area.

Obviously, the recent disaster in Japan has opened eyes and minds in this regard, and Oregon's place as a storage zone for ultra deadly waste that nuclear plants keep generating, does not sit well with a number of Oregon's political leaders.

This is the letter as it was presented.

May 23, 2011

Secretary Steven Chu
U.S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Ave., SW
Washington, DC 20585

Arnold Edelman
GTCC EIS Document Manager
Office of Disposal Operations (EM-43)
U.S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Ave., SW
Washington, DC 20585

Secretary Chu and Mr. Edelman:

As State Legislators representing Portland, Oregon, we urgently and respectfully ask that the Hanford Nuclear Reservation be removed from the U.S. Department of Energy’s list of candidate sites for national permanent storage of radioactive waste.

While we recognize the need for energy resources and proper storage of waste, Hanford Nuclear Reservation is not a viable option. We believe that there are important unresolved matters that demand further scrutiny before the site is committed to further storage of nuclear waste.

The Dept. of Energy is already engaged in one of the largest and most complex cleanup projects in U.S. history at Hanford. For forty years, millions of cubic feet of solid waste were disposed of improperly, placed in trenches and burial sites.

Because of this operation, Hanford is today the most contaminated nuclear site in the United States.

Currently, more than 50 million gallons of radioactive waste are stored in underground tanks. Approximately 475 billion gallons of less-contaminated liquids have been discharged into the soil, creating an area of groundwater contamination in excess of 100 square miles beneath the site.

Throughout the history of the site, over 65 radioactive elements are known to have been released into the environment. While some have decayed over time, others remain present due to their abundance and persistence. These include strontium-90, tritium, cesium-137, and cobalt-6.

The operations of the Hanford Site have resulted in more than 43 million cubic yards of radioactive waste, and over 130 million cubic yards of contaminated soil and debris. This represents two-thirds of the nation's high-level radioactive waste in volume. Although existing efforts have been valuable, there is still significant work needed in order to successfully rehabilitate the area.

Hanford is just across the Columbia River from Oregon and is the most contaminated site in the Western Hemisphere. With over one million people living downriver in Portland, Hood River, The Dalles and other Oregon cities and towns, the contamination also exists within our communities.

The existing situation is perilous enough without adding further waste. Besides the river contamination, those living along the interstate system will be affected much more directly. If Hanford is selected, we will begin to see truckloads of radioactive waste traveling along interstate routes, passing through our cities.

Although not included in recent drafts of the Environmental Impact Statement, a 2008 USDOE study estimated 800 deaths would occur due to ambient radiation from the transport vehicles alone. This does not include the unimaginable number of deaths from a truck accident, earthquake or intentional attack that could happen in or near the centers of our population.

Another study vetted by nuclear scientists in 2004, indicated up to 57 square miles could be rendered uninhabitable, wiping out much of the City of Portland if an accident were to occur at the confluence of I-84 and I-205. While in the past, this was considered an extreme statement, after the events at Fukushima, no one can be so quick to dismiss such a possibility.

Stranger than fiction Order Now

We, the undersigned, urge you to immediately remove Hanford from the list of candidate sites.

Respectfully, Rep. Jules Bailey                                 Rep. Ben Cannon

Rep. Michael Dembrow                         Rep. Margaret Doherty

Rep. Lew Frederick                              Rep. Chris Garrett

Rep. Mitch Greenlick                            Rep. Mary Nolan

Rep. Tobias Read                                Rep. Carolyn Tomei

Sen. Suzanne Bonamici                       Sen. Ginny Burdick

Sen. Richard Devlin                             Sen. Jackie Dingfelder

Sen. Mark Hass                                   Sen. Rod Monroe

Sen. Chip Shields




Comments Leave a comment on this story.
Name:

All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.



Anonymous May 26, 2011 3:07 pm (Pacific time)

Big difference powering a campus with solar (how about cloudy days and high demand), and providing the varied needs of society, which includes industrial, commercial and residential. Just check out the energy needs we have now with what Green energy output is capable of now and even ten years from now (which no one knows because the tech is not even available!). So many of you have no idea what's going on, and nuke, as well as oil, natural gas, hydro-electric are just some of many energy sources that we need and use safely in comparisons to other safety problems from other sources. That is also absurd to say nuclear power for civilian use is part of the military industrial complex. When was the last person in the states killed by a radiation accident, either on a naval vessel or a civilian power plant? When was the last person killed associated with a green energy source? How do you run your website? So many of you live in some fantasy world while you sure have no problem using energy.


jimmy May 25, 2011 3:01 pm (Pacific time)

I agree the best solution would have been to not let the waste pile up in the first place, but the time for that discussion is long past.
We have problem to deal with now and these bumbling "officials" are offering nothing as an alternative. Consider Trojan just outside of Portland, shut down years and it reactor move to... Hanford, but they were kind enough to leave several pools of spent fuel. Do these "experts" suggest that it just be left there? Maybe the next elected official can deal with it? Typical politics... blame anyone but those currently in office..

Editor: I know, no easy answers are at hand.  But it is good for the leaders to speak out purely in the interest of the people, who knows Jimmy...


jimmy May 25, 2011 1:27 pm (Pacific time)

OK, and these nuclear scientists propose we store the waste where again? What was that... they are not nuclear scientists and they have no answer... again? There are ~104 commercial nuclear reactors across the US and they all store their waste on site, just like in Japan. Do these "experts" propose we jsut leave them there for our kids to clean up? Sometimes I wonder....

Editor: I think they would prefer that the madness never began in the first place, and people have always warned against the inherent dangers nukes represent, so it isn't like they just got off the train here in Oregon.  As far as where, why should Oregon bear the brunt of the worst aspect of the American military industrial complex?  I think these experts would suggest shutting down the greed facilities, there is no excuse in this day and age, knowing what we do.  Check the story about the university in Arizona powering their whole campus with solar.  Now that is cool.  Time May Not Leap Ahead in Arizona, but Solar Technology Sure Has - Salem-News.com

[Return to Top]
©2025 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.


Articles for May 23, 2011 | Articles for May 24, 2011 | Articles for May 25, 2011
Tribute to Palestine and to the incredible courage, determination and struggle of the Palestinian People. ~Dom Martin




The NAACP of the Willamette Valley

Support
Salem-News.com:

googlec507860f6901db00.html