Saturday January 4, 2025
| ||||||
SNc Channels: HomeNews by DateSportsVideo ReportsWeatherBusiness NewsMilitary NewsRoad ReportCannabis NewsCommentsADVERTISEStaffCompany StoreCONTACT USRSS Subscribe Search About Salem-News.com
Salem-News.com is an Independent Online Newsgroup in the United States, setting the standard for the future of News. Publisher: Bonnie King CONTACT: Newsroom@Salem-news.com Advertising: Adsales@Salem-news.com ~Truth~ ~Justice~ ~Peace~ TJP |
May-22-2010 02:07TweetFollow @OregonNews You and I and They and Rima Fakih are all the SameQais Nawwaf Special to Salem-News.comI can't blame Arab-Americans for feeling happy about Fakih's new title despite its glaring problems.
(LAS VEGAS, Nv.) - It is no exaggeration to state that Rima Fakih's Miss USA victory is widely perceived as a defining moment in Arab American history. Ululations could be heard from Las Vegas to Dearborn to Lebanon. "We are elated by her success," stated Sarah Najjar-Wilson, president of the American Arab Anti Discrimination Committee. Fakih's promoter Rami Haddad credited her with breaking stereotypes of Arabs. Amer Zahr, an Arab-American comedian, wrote in an open letter to Fakih "In this age where we are fighting for an identity, trying to get a box on the census form, attempting to withstand the impending theft of hummus, and having to prove our patriotism over and over, you are now a symbol." Maytha of Kabobfest perceived Fakih's win as validation of Levantine beauty and a means of limiting racist stereotypes and social stigma towards Arabs. This event was even compared to Barack Obama's winning the presidency. The excitement expressed by Arab-Americans conveys the perception of achieving a milestone on the long, treacherous road towards what appears to be Arab America's grand dream: acceptance into mainstream American society. This is confirmed by Fakih's own statement "It would show the world that yes, there are Arabs that are beautiful not only in looks, but also on the inside. There are Arabs that are caring, that are good people, and who love the country they live in. I think it would make the Arab image a more positive one." As an Arab living in the US, nothing could be further from my mind. In light of the US occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq, I believe the main political objective of Arabs living in the west generally and the US specifically ought to be disruption of, and eventually putting a halt to, the war machine that has devastated and exhausted the lives of innocent millions. Arab-Americans are in an ideal position to demand this. They live in the belly of the beast, and they are in no need to be educated on the fundamentals of the realities of war and occupation, at least in comparison to the general American public the majority of which is frequently found unable to find Afghanistan and Iraq on a map. Arab and Muslim-Americans' perpetual quest for acceptance, pursued with disregard for the responsibility of seriously opposing the wars and occupations, brings to mind Malcolm X's statement addressing African-American involvement in opposing war on Congolese: "they're able to take these hired killers, put them in American planes, with American bombs, and drop them on African villages, blowing to bits Black men, Black women, Black children, Black babies, and you Black people sitting over here cool like it doesn't even involve you. You're a fool. They'll do it to them today, and do it to you tomorrow. Because you and I and they are all the same." To seek approval and acceptance by American (read: white) society by an Arab or Muslim in America at a time like this is as ludicrous as a Vietnamese seeking acceptance from American society in the 60s and 70s instead of focusing their energies on putting an end to the carpet bombing and use of napalm on fellow Vietnamese. It's as ridiculous as an Algerian's seeking acceptance into French society during the zenith of Algeria's colonization or a Black slave presenting his best appearance to his master during the Transatlantic slave trade. It is even more ridiculous when such validation arrives in the sexist, degrading vehicle of a beauty pageant, which we're willing to dismiss in return for 15 minutes of fame. Blogger Will Youmans had no qualms with commenting that he was "happy for her even if the pageant is wack and debases women." Contrary to common understanding among Arab-Americans, an Arab's winning of a beauty pageant does not challenge stereotypes of Arab women. In fact, it confirms them. Subservience to males from underneath the hijab isn't the only stereotype regarding Arab women. The image of the bellydancing, exotic harem girl also permeates western imagination of the Arab world. The physical requirements of winning a beauty pageant do not differ significantly. The image of a bikini-wearing Arab is not exactly a radical shift from the characters of Arabian Nights. In this vein, Rima Fakih’s accomplishment alleviates some of the pressure sensed by Arab-Americans, generally speaking; the responsibility to prove their humanity to the west. I strongly reject this burden. I believe the burden is on the west to prove its humanity to Arabs and Muslims simply because the US, the "greatest purveyor of violence in the world today" according to Martin Luther King Jr., is occupying Afghanistan and Iraq. I would have understood Arab-Americans' need to give themselves a human face if Afghanistan and Iraq were occupying the US. To date, the Afghani and Iraqi peoples have not shock and awed Washington, used depleted uranium on the American people, attacked people at weddings, imposed crippling sanctions or destroyed American culture. Neither have there been any recorded sightings of Afghani tanks roaming the streets of Chicago or of Iraqi fighter jets disrupting the peace of San Francisco. I have heard my Arab and Muslim brethren argue that this is a "strategic" move. That is, if we want to gain political clout and influence US foreign policy, we must first challenge the negative stereotypes of Arabs and Muslims. I see at least two flaws in this argument: First, humanizing the victim in the perspective of the aggressor is not a prerequisite to liberation. If anything, it's a stalling technique to postpone venturing outside one's comfort zone in order to stand up for justice. I am not aware of any successful liberation campaign that suspended its demand for justice pending successful humanization of the victim in the oppressors' eyes. This "strategy" certainly did not preclude MLK Jr. from condemning his government's policies towards Vietnam while simultaneously working to end Jim Crow and desegregate the south. In any case, an Arab winning the beauty pageant does not threaten the status quo, as the US does not categorically reject Arabs occupying high-profile and even powerful establishments positions. Need I say more than "John Abizaid"? The US cannot genuinely claim that it respects Rima Fakih while it continues to imprison, torture, rape and bomb our sisters in Afghanistan and Iraq. It is not the case that the US may consider respecting its Afghan and Iraqi female hostages after an Arab Muslim wins a beauty pageant. The opposite is more likely true; true respect for an Arab beauty pageant and her entire ethnicity and religion may stand a chance only after Afghanistan and Iraq are fully decolonized. Second, even if we were to assume there is merit in the strategy of humanizing Arabs and Muslims first as a step towards eventually achieving Arab and Muslim political influence, what greater agent for humanization is there than opposing the inhumane occupations? If we want to give ourselves a human face before the American public, what better way to accomplish that than to express genuine concern for the lives and self-determination of those under brutal military occupation? In the words of the late Rachel Corrie, "I think it is a good idea for us all to drop everything and devote our lives to making this [occupation] stop." I can't blame Arab-Americans for feeling happy about Fakih's new title despite its glaring problems. A community deserves a break when it endures ethnic profiling at workplaces, schools and airports, harsh immigration policies, hate crimes and overall political marginalization. But the yearning for the elusive carrot of acceptance by a society that overwhelmingly continues to acquiesce, if not support, colonization of two Muslim countries is an exercise in futility. Qais Nawwaf is one of millions of displaced Iraqis. He resides on a colonized part of Indigenous territory commonly referred to as the "United States." He has a degree in a discipline invented by his ancestors: writing. He may be reached at: qnawwaf@gmail.com. Palestine Think Tank: "We are people from different backgrounds who live in different countries. We speak different languages and believe in different religions, or even believe in no religion at all. These differences are not a problem to any of us. Differences are what makes the world a wonderful place because everyone is unique. It allows us the possibility to learn more about the world and gain insights we would never have access to otherwise." Articles for May 21, 2010 | Articles for May 22, 2010 | Articles for May 23, 2010 | Support Salem-News.com: googlec507860f6901db00.html | ||||
Contact: adsales@salem-news.com | Copyright © 2025 Salem-News.com | news tips & press releases: newsroom@salem-news.com.
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy |
All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.
Natalie May 22, 2010 9:42 pm (Pacific time)
DJ, you've got my vote, except I would leave it just "men are afraid...". Rima Fakih is beautiful, but I'm not sure if she's a Muslim. They dug out some pics on her holding what looks like a cigarette. Isn't it a "no-no" for a Muslim woman? I hope it's just a photoshop and nothing else.
Danielis May 22, 2010 7:27 pm (Pacific time)
GP: Once she dyes her hair blonde, we'll know she's made a complete transition to life in America.
Daniel Johnson May 22, 2010 5:58 pm (Pacific time)
I can't resist mentioning things I've noticed over the last couple of weeks (and occasionally before that, as well), but didn't feel they were significant enough to actually warrant a story. I see, here in Calgary, the occasional Muslim couple. She is completely covered head to toe in black--wearing a burka. Only her face shows.
Her husband, walking beside her is wearing standard Western dress--jeans, a T-shirt with some hockey logo. Only the most naive person can believe that Muslim women wear such restrictive, unbecoming apparel by choice. It is what the males in Muslim society have decreed for woman because, let's face facts--Muslim men are afraid of women and their power, their sexuality in particular.
Reminds me of a joke. In Afghanistan, when out and about the women walk a few paces behind the man. Why is that? Land mines.
gp May 22, 2010 4:47 am (Pacific time)
Don't let us kid ourselves, the change from a hajib to a bikini is nothing less than an attack on Islam as beauty pagants have always has been an attack on women by reinforcing perceived usefulness in terms of physical beauty. It is something like a pedigree dog show where the pets obediently assume poses that demonstrate the control of the trainer over the beast. Furthermore, the Islamic world will see this for what it is, an attack not a compliment. It makes me very sad. The hyper-sexuality of our youth, fed by film, videos and the media cause normally rebellious teenage girls to seek further and further outlandish and whore like clothing so that now the norm in young female clothing exposes much of the breast, except of course when a woman is breast feeding. You see this form of contest is not about honoring women or their bodies at all. An intelligent college woman I know of has recently stretched her personal limits by having SLUT tatooed insides her lower lip, this is not only sad but a comment on how hypersexuality toward women affect young girls.
[Return to Top]©2025 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.