Wednesday January 8, 2025
SNc Channels:

Search
About Salem-News.com

 

Jun-18-2013 13:43printcomments

OR Lawmakers to Congress: Corporate Political Spending Shouldn't be Free Speech

Advocates for campaign finance reform argue allowing an unlimited amount of corporate money for campaigns creates an unfair system and hampers the ability of others to be heard.

BIG BIZ? Oregon Legislature considers urging Congress to limit corporate campaign contributions
BIG BIZ? Oregon Legislature considers urging Congress to limit corporate campaign contributions

(SALEM) - The Oregon Legislature is considering a proposal that urges Congress to amend the constitution to say that corporations do not have the same rights as people.

House Joint Memorial 6 tries to send a message that big money is taking over politics and that the U.S. Supreme Court was wrong in its Citizens United ruling that declared governments do not have the authority to limit campaign contributions by corporations and that political spending is a protected form of public speech.

Lawmakers approved the memorial during a House Rules Committee meeting Monday.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon is opposed to the measure, and argues that amending the Constitution to take away free speech rights is dangerous territory.

“Public concern over the skyrocketing costs of political campaigns is understandable,” ACLU legislative director Becky Straus said in her written testimony to lawmakers. “But stricter limits on contributions and expenditures are not the answer. Not only are they unconstitutional, but they actually risk resulting in a less egalitarian and more corrupt system of campaign financing.”

But advocates for campaign finance reform argue allowing an unlimited amount of corporate money for campaigns creates an unfair system and hampers the ability of others to be heard.

“Corporations are not people,” Ben Glebis of Tax Fairness Oregon said in written testimony. “Money collected by corporations is not speech. By clarifying these distorting concepts, citizens, and our representative government, will be in a far stronger position to tackle other important problems, without these distorting influences which have disenfranchised so many.”

Contact Shelby Sebens at Shelby@NorthwestWatchdog.org

Source: Watchdog.org

________________________________________

_________________________________________




Comments Leave a comment on this story.
Name:

All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.



Anonymous June 18, 2013 1:52 pm (Pacific time)

So how about union donations which dwarf all other donations public and private? Unions like corporations are made up of people also. We certainly saw what union members in Wisconsin did with their dues money when they had control...they kept it! Public Union (taxpayer supported) donations are nearly 100% given to the democratic party...so allow all members to vote on distribution. Considering that the unions use this money for power over the democrats, it will not happen. The Supreme Court has ruled and others who don't like certain laws should go run for office.

[Return to Top]
©2025 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.


Articles for June 17, 2013 | Articles for June 18, 2013 | Articles for June 19, 2013
Special Section: Truth telling news about marijuana related issues and events.


googlec507860f6901db00.html


Tribute to Palestine and to the incredible courage, determination and struggle of the Palestinian People. ~Dom Martin

Annual Hemp Festival & Event Calendar