Monday January 6, 2025
| |||
SNc Channels: HomeNews by DateSportsVideo ReportsWeatherBusiness NewsMilitary NewsRoad ReportCannabis NewsCommentsADVERTISEStaffCompany StoreCONTACT USRSS Subscribe Search About Salem-News.com
Salem-News.com is an Independent Online Newsgroup in the United States, setting the standard for the future of News. Publisher: Bonnie King CONTACT: Newsroom@Salem-news.com Advertising: Adsales@Salem-news.com ~Truth~ ~Justice~ ~Peace~ TJP |
Aug-03-2006 12:05TweetFollow @OregonNews New Rules on Labeling Sex Offenders in Oregon as Predatory Now in EffectKevin Hays Salem-News.comFour Oregon sex offenders will learn whether or not they will be labled as predators by the end of the month.
(SALEM) - New administrative rules that allows the Oregon Parole Board to label sex offenders as predatory, and allows convicted sex offenders to challenge the label before they are released from prison, went into effect on Wednesday. The new rules, allows the offender to request a hearing challenge the predatory label. The Parole Board says that the offender can do so with an attorney, mental health or sexual offender treatment provider, or represent himself. The state will not pay for any of the offenders costs associated with trying to get the predatory label removed. The Parole Board says that some predatory sex offenders have requested hearings to have the label removed, however the cannot use the new rules because they took affect after they were paroled from prison. In February 2005, the Oregon Supreme Court ruled that convicted sex offenders may challenge the "predatory" label and ordered the parole board to devise a new system for arriving at that designation. The predatory label is usually asked for by the offenders parole officer, who feels that the offender poses a significant danger to the public.
Here are the new administrative rules: 255-060-0011 Procedures for Predatory Sex Offender Designation (1) For purposes of this rule, a predatory sex offender is defined as a person who exhibits characteristics showing a tendency to victimize or injure others and has been convicted of one or more of the following offenses: Rape in any degree, Sodomy in any degree, Unlawful Sexual Penetration in any degree or Sexual Abuse in any degree. In determining whether an inmate or offender is a predatory sex offender under this rule, the Board shall use the STATIC-99 (Exhibit Q-l) and definitions (Exhibit Q-ll), which have been approved by the Department of Corrections as required by ORS 181.585(2). The Board may also consider any other evidence that the inmate or the offender exhibits characteristics showing a tendency to victimize or injure others. (2) Predatory sex offender designations made by the board for inmates or offenders released from a Department of Corrections institution before February 10, 2005, are not included in this rule. Those designations are governed by the rules in effect when the designation was made. (3) Subject to the procedures set forth in this rule, the Board will make a finding that an inmate or offender is a candidate for predatory sex offender designation, if the inmate or offender scores six or more points on the STATIC-99. (4) Subject to the procedures set forth below, inmates or offenders who score six or more points on the STATIC-99, and have been identified as a candidate for predatory designation, have the right to be advised of their score and submit written objections to the Board before the Board makes a predatory sex offender finding. The Notice of Rights and Written Objections form for this rule are Exhibits Q-lll and Q-IV of the Board's rules. (a) Written objections must be received by a Department of Corrections' institution or release counselor, a supervising officer or the Board within three days of the date the offender or inmate signed the Notice of Rights (Exhibit Q-lll). (b) The Board must receive and review the signed Notice of Rights (Exhibit Q-III) or written documentation that the inmate or offender refused to sign the Notice of Rights before an evidentiary hearing is conducted or waived to determine a predatory sex offender finding. (c) The Board must consider any written objections to the score on the STATIC-99 timely submitted by the inmate or offender before an evidentiary hearing is conducted or waived to determine a predatory sex offender finding. The Board may find an inmate or offender is a candidate for predatory sex offender designation if there is evidence to support a score on the STATIC-99 of six or more points. (d) Inmates or offenders may elect to waive their right to submit written objections. Any such waiver must be in writing. When an inmate or offender waives their right to submit written objections, the Board may find an inmate or offender is a candidate for predatory sex offender designation if the inmate's or offender's score on the STATIC-99 is six or more points. (5) A finding that an inmate or offender is a predatory sex offender may be made by one Board Member. The finding may only be made after the inmate or offender has participated in an evidentiary hearing or waived participation in such a hearing to determine whether the offender is exhibiting characteristics showing a tendency to victimize or injure others. A finding that an offender is a predatory sex offender will be contained in the inmate's or offender's original order of supervision or an amended order of supervision. (6) The sole purpose of the evidentiary hearing will be to determine whether the inmate or offender exhibits characteristics showing a tendency to victimize or injure others. The Board may receive a written report from a supervising officer or a release counselor of any Department of Corrections institution indicating that an inmate or offender who has been determined to be a candidate for designation as a predatory sex offender under paragraphs (3) and (4) exhibits characteristics showing a tendency to victimize or injure others. (a) Upon receipt of a written report from a supervising officer or a release counselor, the Board will review it to determine whether it contains sufficient information to conduct an evidentiary hearing for purposes of determining whether the inmate or offender should be designated as a predatory sex offender. If the Board determines there is sufficient information in the report, it will forward the report to its Hearing Officer, who will schedule an evidentiary hearing. (b) The Board's Hearing Officer will provide the inmate or offender with a copy of the Notice of Rights (Exhibit Q-V) prior to the evidentiary hearing. Upon receipt of the Notice of Rights (Exhibit Q-V), the inmate or offender may proceed with the evidentiary hearing or waive their right to the hearing. At the evidentiary hearing, the Hearings Officer will consider the written report submitted by the supervising officer or release counselor and the results of the STATIC-99 risk assessment scale, and may accept additional evidence supporting the STATIC-99 score or otherwise indicating that the inmate or offender exhibits characteristics showing a tendency to victimize or injure others. The inmate or offender may present evidence rebutting claims made in the written report submitted by a supervising officer or release counselor, challenging the score on the STATIC-99, or rebutting other evidence that the inmate or offender exhibits characteristics showing a tendency to victimize or injure others. At the conclusion of the evidentiary hearing, the Hearing Officer will submit his report to the Board with a recommendation as to whether the inmate or offender exhibits characteristics showing a tendency to victimize or injure others. (c) Upon receipt of the report and recommendation from the Board's Hearing Officer, the Board will review the report and recommendation and determine whether the inmate or offender exhibits characteristics showing a tendency to victimize or injure others and is, therefore, a predatory sex offender. (7) Pursuant to ORS 181.586, the community corrections agency supervising an inmate or offender found to be a predatory sex offender shall notify anyone whom the agency determines is appropriate that the person is a predatory sex offender. The agency shall make this determination as required by ORS 181.586. [ED. NOTE: Exhibits referenced are available from the agency.] Stat. Auth.: ORS 144.050, 144.140, 181.585 & 181.586 Stats. Implemented: Hist.: PAR 4-2000, f. & cert. ef. 2-15-00; PAR 1-2002(Temp), f. & cert. ef. 1-15-02 thru 7-13-02; PAR 4-2002, f. & cert. ef. 3-12-02; PAR 5-2003, f. & cert. ef. 10-10-03; PAR 2-2004(Temp), f. & cert. ef. 1-41-04 thru 7-11-04; PAR 7-2004, f. & cert. ef. 6-14-04; PAR 1-2006(Temp), f. & cert. ef. 3-20-06 thru 9-15-06; PAR 5-2006, f. & cert. ef. 6-14-06; PAR 6-2006(Temp), f. 6-14-06 cert. ef. 6-15-06 thru 12-11-06 255-060-0012 Psychological or Psychiatric Reports Sections (1)–(6) of this rule do not apply to inmates whose only crimes are committed on or after November 1, 1989. (1) Pursuant to ORS 144.125, the Board may order any available psychiatric/psychological report(s) from the Department of Corrections. (2) Pursuant to ORS 144.223, the Board may postpone the parole release date administratively and order a psychiatric/psychological evaluation of any inmate anytime prior to release. (3) After review of the psychiatric/psychological reports, and all other information or documents presented during the hearing the Board may defer parole release until a specified future date upon finding: (a) The inmate has a present severe emotional disturbance, such as to constitute a danger to the health or safety of the community. (4) The Board shall not deny release on parole solely because of an inmate's present severe emotional disturbance. The Board must also find the condition constitutes a danger to the health or safety of the community. (5) The majority of the Board may defer a scheduled parole release date up to two years. A panel may defer a scheduled parole release date up to 18 months. (6) If the Board finds the inmate does not have a present severe emotional disturbance such as to constitute a danger to the health or safety of the community, the Board shall affirm the parole release date and set parole conditions. (7) For purposes of the Board finding that an inmate/offender is a sexually violent dangerous offender pursuant to OAR 255-060-0008, the Board may order a psychological or psychiatric evaluation. Stat. Auth.: ORS 144.125, ORS 144.223 & Ch. 924, 1999 OL Stats. Implemented: Hist.: PAR 2-1990, f. & cert. ef. 4-5-90; PAR 6-1997, f. 3-11-97, cert. ef. 3-14-97; PAR 5-1998, f. & cert. ef. 11-9-98; PAR 4-2000, f. & cert. ef. 2-15-00 255-060-0009 Residence Requirements for Certain Sex Offenders Upon Release from Custody (1) A sex offender classified as a sexually violent dangerous offender (ORS 137.765) or a predatory sex offender (ORS 181.765) may not reside near locations where children are the primary occupants or users. (2) This prohibition applies to permanent housing and not to transitional housing. For purposes of this rule, transitional housing means housing intended to be occupied by a sexually violent dangerous offender or a predatory sex offender for 45 days or less immediately after release from custody. (3) Exceptions to this prohibition may be made by the supervising parole/probation officer if it is determined that there is sufficient information to support this placement in terms of public safety and the rehabilitation of the offender. In making this determination, the following factors must be considered: (a) Other residential placement options pose a higher risk to the community, or (b) An enhanced support system that endorses supervision goals and community safety efforts is available at this residence, or (c) Enhanced supervision monitoring will be in place (e.g. electronic supervision, curfew, live-in-care provider, along with community notification), or (d) This residence includes 24-hour case management, or (e) The offender is being released from prison unexpectedly and more suitable housing will be arranged as soon as possible. If any of these factors apply to the offender and the residence under review, an exception to the permanent residence prohibition may be allowed. (4) The supervising officer must inform the community affected by this decision about the reasons for the decision prior to the offender's release from custody. Stat. Auth.: ORS 144.644, 181.585 Stats. Implemented: Hist.: PAR 5-2001(Temp), f. 12-10-01, cert. ef. 1-1-02 thru 6-29-02; PAR 2-2002, f. & cert. ef. 1-29-02; PAR 6-2002(Temp), f. & cert. ef. 4-15-02 thru 10-11-02, PAR 7-2002, f. & cert. ef. 6-17-02; PAR 3-2003(Temp), f. & cert. ef. 6-13-03 thru 12-9-03; PAR 5-2003, f. & cert. ef. 10-10-03 Many counties in Oregon already provide web-based information about sexual predators, but the new Oregon State Police website allows citizens to view the list of offenders in its entirety. Because of a separate legal dispute, the list initially will not include the names of serious sex offenders who have been released from prison in the past 16 months. The offenders are required to register for life under Oregon law and their information will be permanently available on the state police website. As of July 1st, more than 85% of the predatory sex offenders are listed on the site. Not all sex offenders are classified as "predatory," so not every person who has been convicted of a sexual offense is, or will be listed on the website. Articles for August 2, 2006 | Articles for August 3, 2006 | Articles for August 4, 2006 | Support Salem-News.com: | |
Contact: adsales@salem-news.com | Copyright © 2025 Salem-News.com | news tips & press releases: newsroom@salem-news.com.
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy |
Comments are Closed on this story.
Anonymous August 10, 2006 3:21 pm (Pacific time)
Mr. Anonymous August 9, 2006 8:41 am: Your comments appear to suggest that you don't understand what's going on. 85-90% of sex crimes are committed by family members - dads, uncles, cousins, etc; and by family friends. I agree with you the "We should be more worried about proper justice" but you need to understand the problem before you can render proper justice. Clearly, what you have going on in this country is not proper justice, it's creating FEAR and PANIC to get votes, or to increase TV ratings. Read more!
Anonymous August 9, 2006 8:41 am (Pacific time)
the problem is that when these sex offender get caught it doesn't matter anyway because they just get realeased and are allownd to move in right next door to you and you wife and five daughters anyway... We should be more worried about proper justice !!!
Dr. Vermouth August 5, 2006 6:35 am (Pacific time)
This is why we need sex education, real detailed sex education in the schools. So that the people who make laws can be stopped when they take something good and screw it all up because they know nothing about human sexuality and the terms and definitions that go with it.
Long John Silver August 5, 2006 4:30 am (Pacific time)
Sodomy is a great thing. My wife and I engage in it all the time. So , what does sodomy have to do with pedophilia?
Anonymous August 4, 2006 12:44 pm (Pacific time)
I think the police and the DA need to go back to school before thy point fingers!
Albert Marnell August 4, 2006 5:54 am (Pacific time)
Look at the handsome guy in the red-herring propaganda flyer. Yes, protect children. But what in the hell does pedophilia have to do with consentual adult to adult SODOMY? Remember, repeat after me, "Anything other than coitus is SODOMY. COITUS is PENIS to VAGINA SEX." Now children in the offices of the Capital, repeat this until you get it right, you middle-aged morons and Haus Fraus. Now sing after me and follow the bouncing ball....Sodomy in the morning, sodomy in the evening, sodomy at supper time, be my little sugar (over 21) and we'll sodomize all the time. Sing to the tune of "Sugar in the Morning", Sugar in the morning, Sugar in the evening, sugar at supper time...You see, children who are probably 60 years old in the legislature, it's not so hard. But it will be if you relax a little and know the terms and definitions of human sexuality. Hey, the guy in the picture is so good looking that if he wants, maybe I can go on a date with him and we can go to a hotel or his place and engage in SODOMY. Or if you are getting married on the weekend, besides COITUS on your wedding night, do not forget to engage in SODOMY. To many adults SODOMY is just as much fun as COITUS. MOST women that I know love it when a man wants to perform cunnilingus. For those of you who do not know CUNNILINGUS is when a man puts his mouth on a woman's private part. I have not met a woman yet who does not like this fun activity even though by Oregon Law at this time it appears that this would make you a sex-offender because CUNNILINGUS is SODOMY. BOY, AM I EXHAUSTED FROM THIS EDUCATIONAL PROCESS AND WHERE IS MY PAYCHECK? TALK ABOUT HERO'S, WHERE IS MY AWARD CEREMONY! EVERYONE PLEASE PROTECT YOUR CHILDREN BUT GET OVER YOUR SEXUAL HANG-UPS ABOUT EVERYTHING. MASTURBATION IS EVEN HEALTHY. I DO NOT KNOW A DOCTOR IN THE WORLD WHO WOULD NOT SAY THIS EXCEPT SOME RELIGIOUS NUT WHO BELIEVES IN BURING WITCHES. PROTECT CHILDREN FROM PEDOPHILES BUT AT THE SAME TIME YOU CAN BE ENJOYING SODOMY WITH THE ADULT OF YOUR CHOICE. DO NOT TELL ME WHAT TO DO WITH MY TOOL IN THE PRIVACY OF MY OWN HOME, MOTEL, OR PUP-TENT IN THE MOUNTAINS! GOD is he angry. Yeahhhhhhhhh!
Anonymous August 3, 2006 9:09 pm (Pacific time)
Not all accusers are kids. Many allegations are made by adults with an agenda. Polygraphs should be mandatory for the accusers in those cases but they are not. It's up to the accused to prove his innocence. The accuser should be held accountable when the accused is not charged or found not guilty. Fair is fair. Sexual abuse allegations are tough to live down.
Hedda Lettice August 3, 2006 9:05 pm (Pacific time)
Hey Adrianne, If you really knew law and sexual terms, you would not be so happy. You are a sex offender if the man in your life ever put his mouth on your valley of love! You Dope!
Fredal Cinsey August 3, 2006 8:58 pm (Pacific time)
These new rules are not just about children. My God I am about ready to have a stroke. These rules technically go into the bedrooms of even married couples and other adults that choose to have sexual relations in the privacy of their own homes or motels. Anyone that says that this is not true is a reprehensible LIAR!
Albert Marnell August 3, 2006 8:51 pm (Pacific time)
I bet alot of people are intimidated by the list of rules and exceptions and numbers that make up this convoluted law. It all sounds sophisticated doesn't it? With all of the numbers and letters and the long list it sounds quite legal doesn't it? Well it is not. It is a pile of garbage and makes no sense whatsoever and is so complicated with antiquated, unscientific and destructive legislation that should make your hair curl. If you put all the brains together of the people who wrote these rules you would still have only half a brain!
Mike Davis August 3, 2006 7:18 pm (Pacific time)
Oregon needs to change the legal age of consent to 17 like Washington state.
anonymous August 3, 2006 5:59 pm (Pacific time)
I know that not all sex offenders are bad some just get the blame because they are over 21 and the females are 17 to 18 years old. that is not fair.
Anonymous August 3, 2006 5:42 pm (Pacific time)
would u get your friend in troble(we have to stick together now on this story!after 8mos. their story didnt match...go fig!
Anonymous August 3, 2006 5:29 pm (Pacific time)
not only that if u were not charge with a crime.....why in He** is your name with the DA office for life!I tell u Oregon laws sucks big time....but cops can shoot people!on leave(paid) and get by with it! shoot to hurt not to kill...
Anonymous August 3, 2006 5:19 pm (Pacific time)
so where do we draw the line here......am not saying all kids lie but some and I say some do! walk in my shoes .if u people were accused u would feel diff!and the child lied....go fig!
Anonymous August 3, 2006 5:09 pm (Pacific time)
so you guys are saying all kids are angels!
Anonymous August 3, 2006 4:32 pm (Pacific time)
Kids actually lie about abuse - not necessarily maliciously. You shouldn't just assume that a kid claiming abuse has actually been abused. Requiring the accused to prove that the kid is lying means transfering the burden of proof to the accused, instaed of on the accuser and prosecutors/police. This is travesty - completely opposite of what the constitution demands. In fact, the accused needs not open his mouth. Actually, some kids have been encouraged to lie, and made to believe things that mya not have happened. Too often, a woman dumped by her man resorts to using her kids to claim sexual abuse, and the man ending up in jail. So, you can't just assume that a kid claiming abuse has actually been abused.
Anonymous August 3, 2006 3:13 pm (Pacific time)
Kids who report sexual abuse are the alleged victim of a crime. If the offender does not want to take a poly then of course he or she will be arrested on the accusion of abuse. Then it is up to him or her an the attorney to prove the kid is lying. I'm sure in most cases however the kids who claims to be the victim of abuse is not lying.
Albert Marnell August 3, 2006 2:33 pm (Pacific time)
What is wrong with the poorly educated people in this country. Some of them have Master Degrees or higher. SODOMY in any degree gets you labeled as a sexual predator. DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE LEGAL DEFINITION OF SODOMY IS PEOPLE? It is anything other than coitus, which is penis to vagina sex. If a man and his wife enjoy cunnilingus or fellatio they are engaging in SODOMY. Get with it people! You praise these laws and do not even know what in the hell they are. You think you know what the definition of sodomy is and you are too damn lazy to get the proper reference material to find out. You just want to wing-it and go with the flow of other people with a half-baked level of knowledge. Sodomy is usually and unfairly used against homosexuals and lesbians even though the term applies to heterosexuals. Law enforcement selectively uses these anti-sodomy laws unless they have it in for a heterosexual couple and can prove that a man and woman are engaging in SODOMY even in their own bedroom. I encourage men and women and men and men and women and women to engage in SODOMY. It is a sexual release and adds spice to a boring Puritan sex life. Thank GOd for fellatio and cunnilingus. I am a sex-pert in additon to other things. Very few states still have SODOMY LAWS on the books. Most states have struck them down. If Oregon has these laws, get the hell out of Oregon because the people who you think know legal definitions have their heads up their rear ends which is also a form of SODOMY! If these laws are selectively used against or can be used against homosexual men and women in the privacy of their own home. Again, get the hell out of Oregon because this would mean that it is a REAL nit-wit state.
Anonymous August 3, 2006 1:44 pm (Pacific time)
So do the kids take a polly test?
Adrianne August 3, 2006 1:26 pm (Pacific time)
This is good reporting and I have seen that the State of Oregon is being very realistic in giving more attention to, (and using their resources more wisely) on those that may pose the greatest danger to our children rather than lumping everyone together. Clearly, all sex offenders are not the same in terms of their likelihood of recidivism. It's also good that the State is not going to pay for those classified as "predatory" for any attorney's cost associated with the evidentiary hearings. It was of the sex offender's making and the State can't keep spending on them.
Anonymous August 3, 2006 1:24 pm (Pacific time)
Well I think the police and the DA point fingers before u are charge....not only that thy want u to take a polly test and if u dont then your lieing....kids lie too! to get what thy want in life. if its to hurt some1 that didn't.....I think thy should ck. out the story better....before pointing fingers...makes the 1 who dont look bad! are laws sucks!
[Return to Top]©2025 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.