Mrs. Nadal was insane, not guilty of extraordinary hateful vengeance.
(PARIS, France) - New evidence is developing in the Houston castration case, via the Facebook page of Mrs. Jennifer Coias, in an entry dated August 18, 2009.
Five weeks after the birth of the baby boy, Katherine Nadal was down in deep post-partum depression, a fact attested by her taking strong pain-killers (methadone notably, which is supposed to prevent from addiction) rather than being “high on drugs”, as unjustly reproached.
Mrs Nadal has been condemned on a highly unbelievable and unproven assumption that she would have castrated her child, which she has constantly denied. She logically “showed no remorse at the 99 year sentence” as a prosecution-minded journalist emphasized, insinuating she would be a monster.
Nevertheless, since no blood or ADN was found on either sharp instruments in the house or the dachshund, this pure hypothesis is doubtful. There was no blood on the keen-teeth hunter simply because it had greedily licked his chops and paws.
Anyway, in this extreme supposition, Mrs. Nadal was insane, not guilty of extraordinary hateful vengeance against her husband with whom, besides, she had a mere argument, not a knife fight.
It appeared at the sentencing, that hatred in the couple did not come from Mrs Nadal but from her high on hatred companion who, as she shouted: “I didn’t hurt him.”, screamed at her in response: “You abused him while he was still in the womb!” (see: newser.com/tag/687/1/texas.html).
Another example of manly hatred in this trial came from the prosecution:
OA_show(1);
“At closing arguments, the district attorney showed a picture of the smiling child and told the jury, "This kid has so many problems coming toward him in the future. She took his identity, folks. And she either flushed it or threw it in the trash can somewhere." ” (see: newser.com/story/67170/texas-mom-gets-99-years-for-cutting-off-sons-genitals.html)
But we have learned that, in the ambulance to the hospital, her only concern was the future of her baby:
"Zalesnik was shown his report notes in which he wrote that Nadal had asked in the ambulance, 'Is my baby going to live?'" (see: abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&id=6961392&rss=rss-ktrk-article-6961392)
Also: "Oncken also said after Holden was attacked, Nadal was more focused on how long her son's surgery was going to take". (see: abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&id=6961392&rss=rss-ktrk-article-6961392)
But prosecutor Oncken insidiously meant that Mrs Nadal only wanted to be free as soon as possible.
America is decidedly mad over circumcision: yet how can a state court of justice condemn first without proof and second, judge an obviously insane person without psychiatric expertise?
This can only be due to deep post circumcision traumatic disorder, unconsciously affecting women as well as men.
It is high time to outlaw circumcision.
New Evidence in Botched Houston Castration TrialSalem-News.com